• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Spider Lily Justify FTrashised NUAss Farked Up Ranking!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>NUS sheds light on rankings and excellence
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I WOULD like to share our perspectives on the report, 'NUS is 10th in Asia varsity rankings' (May13), regarding the Quacquarelli Symonds Ltd (QS) Asian University Rankings.
The QS Asian University Rankings is new and covers five individual subject areas. Within these subject areas, the National University of Singapore (NUS) was placed third in engineering and information technology, third in social sciences, fourth in arts and humanities, fourth in life sciences and biomedicine, and sixth in the natural sciences.
We are still in the process of understanding the methodology and criteria for the overall rank placements, but note that NUS' subject rankings are consistent with a number of other surveys. For example, the 2008 rankings by the University of Texas at Dallas based on publications in the top research journals in business, placed NUS at second in Asia.
It is also in line with the Times Higher Education-QS World University Rankings, where NUS was ranked fourth in Asia and 33rd in the world in 2007; and fourth in Asia and 30th in the world last year.
Beyond rankings, however, what is critical is our commitment to excellent education and research, and the impact these are achieving. The high quality of NUS' students and education is widely recognised as reflected, for example, by the 66 joint- or double-degree programmes between NUS and top universities overseas and the widespread interest in NUS' distinctive global education programmes.
This year, we are phasing in an exciting new design-centric engineering curriculum in which our students learn to identify and solve complex problems while developing a better understanding of engineering concepts through research and self-learning. The recent student-designed NUS eco-car, which won fifth place among 66 participating teams from 37 countries, is an example of this.
Similarly, NUS research has high and increasing impact. While numeric parameters, such as NUS' publications in top journals, citations per faculty and citations per paper, are all moving robustly in the right direction, our focus is on ensuring that our research opens up important new insights and creates real breakthroughs which significantly advance scholarship and application.
NUS continues to pursue its aspiration of being a leading global university centred in Asia, so that it can do even more for the students with whose education we are entrusted, and contribute to Singapore's development through the creation and application of important new knowledge. Professor Lily Kong
Vice-president (University & Global Relations)
National University of Singapore
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=heading>Latest comments</TD></TR><TR><TD id=messageDisplayRegion width="100%"><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=Post cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Accept the ranking please and do not try to give all sort of reasons for the low ranking. I call on NUS not to think that it is the best because it take in many foreign students. NUS always think that anything foreign is good but I wish to differ. Give the university places to more Singaporeans and not foreigners and the ranking will sure to improve.

</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: Deserving at Mon May 25 12:09:32 SGT 2009

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=AlternatePost cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>NUS just lacks of attractive ability to many people. It needs earn reputation and asset to upgrade its campus. It needs to have its own standing point to raise ranking in Asia and World.

</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: ellinlin at Mon May 25 09:05:19 SGT 2009

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=Post cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>It is a very defensive letter.

Prof Kong's response says a lot but actually says nothing much that we don't already know. ..that NUS looks very good on paper, when the right parameters are used. This is because NUS has a strategic approach based on certain metrics that will do well in ranking exercises. The fact that when the ranking metrics are altered, ranking falls so precipitously suggests a lack real 'health' in the system.

I have posted recently on the management by metrics approach that many organizations take nowadays, and this is really what is happening here. So little of what Prof Kong says reflects on the NUS real commitment to teaching and training. Recruitment of new staff is fundamentally based on the research accomplishments rather than on a passion for students and teaching.

http://gigomole.blogspot.com/search/label/university
http://gigomole.blogspot.com/search/label/medicalschool

"...curriculum in which our students learn to identify and solve complex problems while developing a better understanding of engineering concepts through research and self-learning" really points to the reality that there is fundamentally a major shift in the NUS strategic approach to more high end academic research pursuits, and away from a core mission of education and training. Okay for a research institute, but where is the focus on teaching?

For professional schools such as engineering and medicine, this will result in sub-quality practitioners and professionals produced by the schools.

My suggestion to NUS....and NTU as well....get away from these artificial metrics and go back to basics about your strategic directions as a university. Recruit people who are good academics but also good teachers, and who have a heart for students.

http://gigomole.blogspot.com/2009/05...unrelated.html

</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: gigamole3 at Mon May 25 08:58:21 SGT 2009

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=AlternatePost cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>sounds like a very defensive letter. as an alumnus who has seen numerous major construction projects in the school, i have come away with the impression that nus is focused more on looking good than actually being good. instead of focusing so much on making its buildings look grand, i suggest the university focuses more attention on its students and for its staff.

</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: bluebelle at Mon May 25 00:54:05 SGT 2009

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Top