Using the term that she is reticent or avoids publicity is no longer an excuse. She heads one of 2 sovereign funds that belongs to the state. If she wanted to remain private, she should have either played monopoly or managed her own private portfolio.
There is a duty and an obligation to answer to the citizens and not hide behind the cloak of secrecy when times are bad. She was not elected but appointed to what I consider a public office by virtue of the fact that assets belongs to the state.
Here are the lists of things that Singaporeans would like to know;
1) Her single biggest achievement while steering Temasek and why should it be considered an achievement.
2) What particular or unique skill did she possess that allowed her to remain in Temasek for 7 years
3) How did the portfolio perform compared to other well regarded sovereign funds and benchmarks.
There is a duty and an obligation to answer to the citizens and not hide behind the cloak of secrecy when times are bad. She was not elected but appointed to what I consider a public office by virtue of the fact that assets belongs to the state.
Here are the lists of things that Singaporeans would like to know;
1) Her single biggest achievement while steering Temasek and why should it be considered an achievement.
2) What particular or unique skill did she possess that allowed her to remain in Temasek for 7 years
3) How did the portfolio perform compared to other well regarded sovereign funds and benchmarks.