• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Some Truth is out oredi. reduce FTs is just joking ,donch be angry!

Tiu Kwang Yew

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Feb 14, 2009
Messages
1,589
Points
48
Feb 3, 2010
Foreign labour will still make up one-third of workforce
CONTRARY to some media reports, the Economic Strategies Committee (ESC) is not recommending a cut in foreign worker numbers.

This was made clear by Manpower Minister Gan Kim Yong, who chaired the ESC sub-committee which looked at managing the size of the foreign workforce to ensure it does not hinder the push for productivity.

Mr Gan explained that foreigners will continue to make up one-third of Singapore's workforce, about the same as the current proportion.

'Our objective is looking at a balance between local and foreign to make sure that it's sustainable,' he told The Straits Times in an interview a day after the ESC released its recommendations.

'But this is not an exact science. We have to bear in mind that there will be business cycles.

'The boom time, we may need to increase a little bit; in a recession like what happened last year, the foreign worker numbers have come down.

'But in the next 10 years, the aim is to maintain it at about one-third of the overall workforce.'

One thing is for sure: Foreign workers will get more costly to hire, with the ESC proposing a gradual increase in their levy.

The extent of the increase will be disclosed later during the Budget, but yesterday, Mr Gan explained how it works.

Foreign workers can make up only a specified proportion of a company's workforce. For instance, it is 50 per cent for service sector companies.

While this ceiling will not change, there are now tiers, with each having a different levy. The tiers and levy price are likely to be tweaked.

So one tier could set the ceiling at 30 per cent of foreigners, with a certain levy. If companies want to hire more foreign workers, they have to pay a higher levy.

When asked whether the levy will be raised to ensure the wages of foreign workers are on par with Singaporean workers in similar jobs, Mr Gan said: 'It won't be so simple.'

 

I started a joke, which started the whole world crying,
but I didn't see that the joke was on me, oh no.

I started to cry, which started the whole world laughing,
oh, if I'd only seen that the joke was on me.

I looked at the skies, running my hands over my eyes,
and I fell out of bed, hurting my head from things that I'd said.

Til I finally died, which started the whole world living,
oh, if I'd only seen that the joke was on me.

I looked at the skies, running my hands over my eyes,
and I fell out of bed, hurting my head from things that I'd said.

'Til I finally died, which started the whole world living,

oh, if I'd only seen that the joke was on US :mad:
 
>When asked whether the levy will be raised to ensure the wages of foreign workers are on par with Singaporean workers in similar jobs, Mr Gan said: 'It won't be so simple.'

Wake up SINkingporens...you minister!
 
One thing is for sure: Foreign workers will get more costly to hire, with the ESC proposing a gradual increase in their levy.

Typically and classically PAP style. Any problem just increase revenue collecting. People smoke, increase tobacco tax. Foreigners come, impose levy. HDB resale, impose resale levy. Too many cars, impose COE. Traffic jam, erect ERP gantry. Lower incomes and self-employed high but unaccountable incomes, impose GST (note the original idea was "a fairer tax for all" not "GST to help the poor"). All their solution policies cost people money. The more problems, the more complaints, the richer they get. Perhaps if all Singaporeans keep quiet and no complaint, then they worry, where to find the next avenue to increase government revenue.
 
Back
Top