• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

So what you guys think? Can we drag our employers to court if they don't pay us?

MaxRiley

Alfrescian
Loyal
Eh they set up small claims employment tribunal so that we can drag employers to court if they don't pay us.
Wonder if it's that easy. Sure or not?
What you guys think?

http://www.fivestarsandamoon.com/will-new-employment-claims-tribunal-help-with-pay-disputes/

Will new employment claims tribunal help with pay disputes?

Acting Minister for Manpower Tan Chuan-Jin announced a new Small Claims Employment Tribunal at the Ministry of Manpower’s workplan brief on 24 April, signaling an intention to enhance the salary claims process. An official date for establishing this tribunal was not announced.

Today, a worker who wants to bring an employer to task for unpaid or underpaid monies will have to work through the Small Claims Tribunal, go to the Labour Court or take on a civil suit – all of which can be disruptive, time-consuming processes which are often not worth the monies recovered.

As a result, many pay issues go unattended and are never raised, which in turn means that many bad employment practices with smaller consequences can often continue unchecked.

This move follows a push by Labour MP Patrick Tay at the Committee of Supply debate in March for a “tripartite mediation process (that) can be complemented with an employment tribunal possibly with direct involvement by tripartite partners so that disputes that are unable to be resolved at tripartite mediation can be expeditiously adjudicated.”

Much potential, much effort needed

The Small Claims Employment Tribunal, which Acting Minister Tan called “expeditious and affordable”, is for all workers, including managers and executives earning above $4,500. The current scope of the Employment Act means that such middle and upper managers would have to pursue expensive and lengthy civil suits in cases of wage disputes.

The potential for this tribunal is significant if properly implemented. Hopefully, more employment claims disputes will now be worth raising, and will be resolved more quickly. This will mean better protection for both workers and employers against unfair treatment or unfair claims.

The process needs to be as painless as possible for all parties, and success stories need to be shared widely, otherwise skepticism will remain and this tribunal will be ineffective.

This means that MOM may have to do more legwork in the interim, while the employment landscape adjusts to norms of claims and how to avoid these incidents.

With an effective process in place, employers and workers alike will be discouraged from engaging in needless pay disputes, setting a new norm for the employment environment that is more balanced and just.

Limits

The new tribunal is still being conceived, with many details undefined, but one thing is clear – it cannot diminish the role of unions, which must remain at the frontline of wage dispute resolution. Effective and mutually beneficial collective wage bargaining must continue to be the frontline so that disputes are minimized and the tribunal only has to catch outliers and recalcitrants.

There will be a claims limit, yet undefined, so longstanding issues have to be raised early before claims exceed a certain threshold.

Minister Tan also cautioned that the tribunal cannot resolve all disputes – the nature of human relations means that there will always be some level of unhappiness and blurred lines where a decision is not clear-cut.

The Ministry of Manpower “will continue to consult and engage (their) stakeholders on the Tribunal Proposal in the following months”

Questions remain

In its nascent form, questions still remain: How will this new tribunal integrate with current Labour Court, or with the Small Claims Tribunal?

Will it cover freelancers and project workers? Stories abound of models, photographers, musicians and other such professions having payment withheld, disputed or excessively delayed. Hopefully this tribunal will protect them as well.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
How about employees who pocket their salaries but don't do their jobs? Shouldn't they be dragged to court as well?
 

Kuailan

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think my former employer is in Changi Moon Crescent Bungalow having good time there for 3months,
I quit b'cos he own me 4.5 months of my salary but I did not complained, probably the other staff
complained to MOM than he was called up for coffee and followed by free food and lodging at Changi
Holiday Bungalow.
 

MaxRiley

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think my former employer is in Changi Moon Crescent Bungalow having good time there for 3months,
I quit b'cos he own me 4.5 months of my salary but I did not complained, probably the other staff
complained to MOM than he was called up for coffee and followed by free food and lodging at Changi
Holiday Bungalow.

Well that guy deserved it. You should've complained. But not I guess with this new tribunal, it will make things easier?
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
How about employees who pocket their salaries but don't do their jobs? Shouldn't they be dragged to court as well?

Please do not sprout nonsense....they have SNEF & the arbitration court, & have the authority to SACK YOU ON THE SPOT & WHATEVER TERMS & CONDITIONS OF THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT...no need to drag to court...dock the person salary & point to the door...:rolleyes:
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Please do not sprout nonsense....they have SNEF & the arbitration court, & have the authority to SACK YOU ON THE SPOT & WHATEVER TERMS & CONDITIONS OF THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT...no need to drag to court...dock the person salary & point to the door...:rolleyes:

I'm saying that is not sufficient and the law should be changed.

If an employee is being paid $5000 per month and after an investigation, it has been found that he has only been doing $1500 worth of work for the last six months while he spent most of his time spewing anti PAP garbage in this forum, the law should allow the employer to sue the employee for the shortfall of $3500 x 6 months.

After all, if an employer underpaid an employee for six months, he'd be liable to pay all the shortfall he owed the employee.
 
Top