• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Sinkies To Sign Non-Disclosure Agreement With SMRT If They Want To Receive Compensation

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
compensation-1-650x554.jpg


compensation.jpg


Below is a letter written by one of the commuters involved in the collision at Joo Koon MRT station on 15 Nov 2017, which describes his experience of claiming reimbursement from SMRT

Firstly, I am not writing this to shame SMRT. And overall, I got a resolution. But it certainly could have gone a lot better though.

I was one of the passengers of the front cabin of the train in the Joo Koon MRT collision on November 15th 2017. During that incident, I fell on my backside. I walked out of the station, feeling lucky that I only got a bump on my backside, without any other injury. However, later that afternoon, my left arm felt completely devoid of strength, and my left ankle started to hurt. The following day, I went to see a clinic doctor. I then proceeded to emailed the smrt staff with my medical bills for claims.

It took them one and a half months for them to contact me again. The SMRT staff told me the claim is approved. However, they will need me to sign a "discharge voucher" before the amount of $31.70 can be reinbursed.

A few days later, they mailed the "discharge voucher" to me. When I read the "discharge voucher", I got a rude shock. They mailed me a bloody contract and expected me to sign it.

This contract demanded 3 terms:
1) The payment is final, no further amounts can be claimed.
2) No further responsibility can be held on the SMRT.
3) Terms of the agreement are to be kept entirely confidential.


Angrily, I told the staff, there was no way in hell that I would sign such a contract. I told them in no uncertain terms, that even if I was agreeable to the first 2 conditions, there was no way that I would sign away my rights to disclosure.

This whole back-and-forth went on for more than 1 week, with the staff transferring the case to her manager, whom I have had to explain all over, that I will under no circumstances surrender my rights to disclose anything that I want to disclose. The manager explained to me that this was simply their company policy, and every claimant had to go through the same things. I told her promptly, her company policies are none of my concern, and they are the ones who caused the problem in the first place. The compensation should have been UNCONDITIONAL.

Finally at the end, I told her to stop making me repeat myself. Under no circumstances would I sign a something that would allow SMRT to use against me. I will not sign away my rights to full disclosure, end of discussion. I told her, if SMRT refuses to pay the reimbursement, that's fine. I was already prepared to either: a) I forfeit the compensation, b) I go to the small claims tribunal.

Finally, the SMRT manager relented. She said she would reimburse the amount into my EZ-Link card, WITHOUT HAVING TO SIGN ANY CONTRACT. I said, okay then.

A week after that, 15th January 2018, exactly 2 months after the incident, the amount of SGD $31.70 was approved and ready for collection.

Well, yes, not the most pleasant experience. But at least a resolution was met without having to conform to SMRT's strict procedures. If they chose to, they could have done this better, without having to demand claimants follow their terms unilaterally.


https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/20...ntract-before-medical-fees-can-be-reimbursed/
 

Truth_Hurts

Alfrescian
Loyal
Talk about the gahmen protecting its own with a compliant judiciary. In ang mor lands I will sign such n agreement and publish it the next day. If I get sued the independent courts would throw such a case out. Of for them to sue..the cost is more than the 30 bucks...what a load of crock
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
Does not look enforceable. Some goon trying to be smart without an A. That is smrt in a nutshell.
 

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
the time taken and admin resources spent on this matter is more than the pay-out.....
 

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
I am very curious. How did she manage to find such a cheapo doctor? $30+ is usually only consultation. No medicine or other shit.

Even doctor's fee alone...must also factor in transport costs, time in attendance and MC resulting in loss of incentive payments in some companies.
 
Top