- Joined
- Dec 31, 2015
- Messages
- 1,889
- Points
- 83
https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...fined-again-over-poem-that-was-in-contempt-of
Lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam fined again over poem that was in contempt of court
In a Facebook post on May 19, 2017, Mr Eugene Thuraisingam alleged that "million dollar men", including judges, have "turned blind" to a cruel and unjust law. PHOTO: ST FILE
Published
Oct 29, 2018, 8:00 pm SGT
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Email
Cara Wong
SINGAPORE - A tribunal has ruled that lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam had not intended to attack the judiciary with his death penalty poem, which was earlier found to be in contempt of court.
The ruling meant Mr Thuraisingam was fined instead of being referred to the Court of Three Judges - the highest disciplinary body to deal with lawyer misconduct.
The lawyer was fined $6,000 by a High Court in August 2017, after he pleaded guilty to posting a 22-line poem on his Facebook page in May that year that was ruled in contempt of court. The posting went up hours before his client was hanged for drug trafficking.
The Attorney-General had complained that in his poem, Mr Thuraisingam alleged that "million dollar men" including judges, had "turned blind" to a cruel and unjust law, and were more concerned with acquiring financial wealth and material goods.
In addition to the sentence dealt to him by the High Court, Mr Thuraisingam was facing disciplinary action for failing to meet the standard of conduct befitting his role.
But the tribunal, in its report released last week, deemed that his misconduct was not grave enough for action under a higher disciplinary body, where he could have been struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors.
Instead, he was reprimanded and recommended to be fined another $18,000 in April this year. The Council of the Law Society later reduced this to $5,000.
The tribunal, appointed by the Chief Justice, comprised Senior Counsel Cavinder Bull and lawyer Teo Weng Kie.
In the report, the tribunal noted that the reference to judges in Mr Thuraisingam's poem "is more likely to have been an authorial misstep than a deliberate assault upon judicial integrity", as the poem's meaning would not have changed significantly if the reference to judges was removed.
The most compelling point of mitigation for Mr Thuraisingam was his efforts to remedy and apologise for his contempt, said the report.
He immediately removed the Facebook post after receiving a letter from the Attorney-General informing him of his transgressions. He later also posted a public apology for his poem.
The tribunal also found that Mr Thuraisingam's remorse for his actions is genuine, and noted that he is unlikely to re-offend.
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/ex-law-fi...idents-victims-tp-clerk-jailed-115014493.html
Ex-law firm exec who got contact details of accident victims from TP clerk jailed
Amir Hussain
Senior Reporter
Yahoo News Singapore 9 November 2018
A former executive at a law firm who got the contact details of 24 accident victims from a Traffic Police clerk in exchange for cash was on Friday (9 November) jailed for 18 weeks.
Over two years, from 2011 to 2013, Gulzar Raja Singh Sandhu, 71, gave Khatijah A. Manap, 63, at least $2,500 – about $200 for each contact who eventually engaged his former employer, Clifford Law.
At the State Courts on Friday, Singh Sandhu pleaded guilty to eight charges of wrongful communication of information under the Official Secrets Act and three counts of corruption.
Another 16 charges of the former, five counts of the latter, and one charge of abetment in perverting the course of justice were considered in sentencing.
Accused offered TP clerk to work with him
In 2008, Khatijah, who was in charge of recording the movement of Traffic Police investigation papers, got into a traffic accident and was referred to Singh Sandhu by a relative of hers. In turn, he introduced her to his daughter, a lawyer at Clifford Law.
Khatijah told Singh Sandhu that she was working in the Traffic Police investigation branch. She had also seen him a few times at work, when he went there to buy official copies of traffic reports.
In 2010, after Khatijah had received the payout for her accident claim, Singh Sandhu approached her at the Traffic Police headquarters and asked her to work with him.
A few days later, she agreed. Singh Sandhu told her that he would pay her $200 as promised at the end of every week.
Khatijah would randomly identify accident victims from the Traffic Police investigation papers that she handled. Once she had about four or five names, she would contact Singh Sandhu.
He would later tell her how many of these people had engaged his firm, and pay her in cash.
Offences came to light
Singh Sandhu and Khatijah’s offences came to light when a man who had been involved in an accident in early 2013 called the Traffic Police hotline to ask about the status of investigations into his crash. He was connected to Khatijah’s office line and left his particulars for a call-back.
Shortly after, he got a call from an “Azizah” claiming to be from Clifford Law. “Azizah” advised the man to consult Singh Sandhu’s daughter if he wished to seek compensation, and said she could arrange a meeting with a paralegal called Raja. But the man hung up the phone.
In early 2012, the man got into another traffic accident and was also contacted by an “Azizah” about seeking compensation after he had lodged a report about the crash. Singh Sandhu later went to the man’s home and told him that he had an arrangement to obtain contact details from someone at the Traffic Police for a fee. But the man told Singh Sandhu to leave and did not seek compensation though him.
Feeling angry after the call from “Azizah” in 2013, the man called Khatijah after he hung up on “Azizah” to ask why Khatijah had disclosed his number to an outsider. Khatijah then told him that she was “Azizah”.
The man made a police report about the offence.
In July 2016, Khatijah was sentenced to 18 weeks’ jail having pleaded guilty to three graft charges and five of wrongful communication of information under the Official Secrets Act.
She admitted to five other corruption charges and 18 other wrongful communication charges which were considered in sentencing.
Lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam fined again over poem that was in contempt of court
In a Facebook post on May 19, 2017, Mr Eugene Thuraisingam alleged that "million dollar men", including judges, have "turned blind" to a cruel and unjust law. PHOTO: ST FILE
Published
Oct 29, 2018, 8:00 pm SGT
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Email
Cara Wong
SINGAPORE - A tribunal has ruled that lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam had not intended to attack the judiciary with his death penalty poem, which was earlier found to be in contempt of court.
The ruling meant Mr Thuraisingam was fined instead of being referred to the Court of Three Judges - the highest disciplinary body to deal with lawyer misconduct.
The lawyer was fined $6,000 by a High Court in August 2017, after he pleaded guilty to posting a 22-line poem on his Facebook page in May that year that was ruled in contempt of court. The posting went up hours before his client was hanged for drug trafficking.
The Attorney-General had complained that in his poem, Mr Thuraisingam alleged that "million dollar men" including judges, had "turned blind" to a cruel and unjust law, and were more concerned with acquiring financial wealth and material goods.
In addition to the sentence dealt to him by the High Court, Mr Thuraisingam was facing disciplinary action for failing to meet the standard of conduct befitting his role.
But the tribunal, in its report released last week, deemed that his misconduct was not grave enough for action under a higher disciplinary body, where he could have been struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors.
Instead, he was reprimanded and recommended to be fined another $18,000 in April this year. The Council of the Law Society later reduced this to $5,000.
The tribunal, appointed by the Chief Justice, comprised Senior Counsel Cavinder Bull and lawyer Teo Weng Kie.
In the report, the tribunal noted that the reference to judges in Mr Thuraisingam's poem "is more likely to have been an authorial misstep than a deliberate assault upon judicial integrity", as the poem's meaning would not have changed significantly if the reference to judges was removed.
The most compelling point of mitigation for Mr Thuraisingam was his efforts to remedy and apologise for his contempt, said the report.
He immediately removed the Facebook post after receiving a letter from the Attorney-General informing him of his transgressions. He later also posted a public apology for his poem.
The tribunal also found that Mr Thuraisingam's remorse for his actions is genuine, and noted that he is unlikely to re-offend.
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/ex-law-fi...idents-victims-tp-clerk-jailed-115014493.html
Ex-law firm exec who got contact details of accident victims from TP clerk jailed
Amir Hussain
Senior Reporter
Yahoo News Singapore 9 November 2018
A former executive at a law firm who got the contact details of 24 accident victims from a Traffic Police clerk in exchange for cash was on Friday (9 November) jailed for 18 weeks.
Over two years, from 2011 to 2013, Gulzar Raja Singh Sandhu, 71, gave Khatijah A. Manap, 63, at least $2,500 – about $200 for each contact who eventually engaged his former employer, Clifford Law.
At the State Courts on Friday, Singh Sandhu pleaded guilty to eight charges of wrongful communication of information under the Official Secrets Act and three counts of corruption.
Another 16 charges of the former, five counts of the latter, and one charge of abetment in perverting the course of justice were considered in sentencing.
Accused offered TP clerk to work with him
In 2008, Khatijah, who was in charge of recording the movement of Traffic Police investigation papers, got into a traffic accident and was referred to Singh Sandhu by a relative of hers. In turn, he introduced her to his daughter, a lawyer at Clifford Law.
Khatijah told Singh Sandhu that she was working in the Traffic Police investigation branch. She had also seen him a few times at work, when he went there to buy official copies of traffic reports.
In 2010, after Khatijah had received the payout for her accident claim, Singh Sandhu approached her at the Traffic Police headquarters and asked her to work with him.
A few days later, she agreed. Singh Sandhu told her that he would pay her $200 as promised at the end of every week.
Khatijah would randomly identify accident victims from the Traffic Police investigation papers that she handled. Once she had about four or five names, she would contact Singh Sandhu.
He would later tell her how many of these people had engaged his firm, and pay her in cash.
Offences came to light
Singh Sandhu and Khatijah’s offences came to light when a man who had been involved in an accident in early 2013 called the Traffic Police hotline to ask about the status of investigations into his crash. He was connected to Khatijah’s office line and left his particulars for a call-back.
Shortly after, he got a call from an “Azizah” claiming to be from Clifford Law. “Azizah” advised the man to consult Singh Sandhu’s daughter if he wished to seek compensation, and said she could arrange a meeting with a paralegal called Raja. But the man hung up the phone.
In early 2012, the man got into another traffic accident and was also contacted by an “Azizah” about seeking compensation after he had lodged a report about the crash. Singh Sandhu later went to the man’s home and told him that he had an arrangement to obtain contact details from someone at the Traffic Police for a fee. But the man told Singh Sandhu to leave and did not seek compensation though him.
Feeling angry after the call from “Azizah” in 2013, the man called Khatijah after he hung up on “Azizah” to ask why Khatijah had disclosed his number to an outsider. Khatijah then told him that she was “Azizah”.
The man made a police report about the offence.
In July 2016, Khatijah was sentenced to 18 weeks’ jail having pleaded guilty to three graft charges and five of wrongful communication of information under the Official Secrets Act.
She admitted to five other corruption charges and 18 other wrongful communication charges which were considered in sentencing.
