• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Singapore Navy spend $1.2 billion on useless ships

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Sinkies very song or not? Still waiting for the reason why we need this despite having almost no territorial waters to speak off.

MRCV
Multi-Role Combat Vessel - MRCV Picture Credit: Republic of Singapore Navy

DSTA Reveals Origins Of Singapore’s MRCV​

At the Warships 2024 conference held in June in Adelaide, Singapore's DSTA officials shared some new details on the Republic of Singapore Navy's future Multi Role Combat Vessels (MRCV).​

Ben Felton 05 Sep 2024

The Republic of Singapore Navy’s future MRCV, which is set to become the first surface combatant ship designed as a drone mothership, is based on a fusion of designs from Sweden and Denmark.
Designs from Saab Kockums and Denmark’s Odense Maritime Technology (OMT) were initially two separate entrants into the MRCV program.
However, as the process developed, the two companies decided to merge their respective proposals according to officials from Singapore’s Defence Science and Technology Agency (DSTA) speaking at the Royal Institute of Naval Architects (RINA) Warships 2024 conference in Adelaide, South Australia.
The final design, which incorporates elements from both companies’ reference designs, was eventually successful in fulfilling the MRCV requirement – beating out offerings from an unknown number of other companies.
OMT’s initial design was based on an enlarged version of the Royal Danish Navy’s Absalon-class and Iver Huitfeldt-class frigates, modified to meet Singaporean payload requirements and to allow for future payload growth. Saab Kockums, meanwhile, proposed a smaller, corvette-sized, vessel building on the heritage of the Royal Swedish Navy’s Visby-class.
When the designs were merged, design elements, systems and approaches from both reference designs were incorporated into the new design. The companies also agreed to cooperate as if both were equal, despite OMT being formally only a subcontractor to Saab Kockums.
The evolution of Singapore's MRCV.
A diagram showing the evolution of Singapore’s MRCV. Credit: DSTA
On the OMT side, the MRCV design incorporates the enlarged Absalon/Iver Huitfeldt’s hull lines and structural steel design, as well as its proposed payload management system. Where it differs is on the combat system and propulsion side, where the design takes heavily from the Saab concept, most notably in its use of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic in the superstructure and masts as well as its approach to integrating weapons and sensors.
During the 2023 edition of IMDEX Asia, Naval News learned that the MRCV would have a displacement of around 8,000 tons and a crew complement of about 80 sailors, indicating a high level of automation in the platform. The following sensors and weapons are set to be fitted on the ships:
  • Leonardo’s 76mm naval gun in the STRALES variant;
  • MBDA’s VL MICA NG and Aster B1 NT air defence missiles;
  • ST Engineering / IAI Blue Spear anti-ship missiles;
  • Thales’ SeaFire multifunction radar
  • Safran’s PASEO XLR EO/IR system;
  • Safran’s NGDS decoy launching system.
The MRCV’s organic weapons and sensors, however, won’t be its primary weapons as it is intended as a mothership for autonomous and uncrewed systems. This focus on the platform’s embarked systems is reflected in the design choices made around the MRCV’s power and propulsion systems.
To enable flexibility and growth, the DSTA decided to mandate an Integrated Full Electric Propulsion (IFEP) for the MRCV. IFEP is an arrangement where diesel engines and or gas turbines generate electricity which can be used for both ship services – such as the combat system – and propulsion via electric motors.
The key advantage of this arrangement according to the DSTA is that it is flexible as electricity can be directly moved from propulsion to powering combat systems, or vice versa, as needed. Typically, in other warship designs that incorporate IFEP power arrangements, the electrical system is powered by both gas turbines and diesel engines with the turbines only turning on when power demand spikes.
However, for the Republic of Singapore Navy, this wasn’t an option as it would require them to set up a whole other maintenance, sustainment and training pipeline to support marine gas turbines given that no other Republic of Singapore Navy vessel uses gas turbine engines.

Instead, the DSTA opted for a fully-diesel powered IFEP arrangement which limits the ship’s ability to generate massive amounts of power to enable high-speed operations or faster acceleration. This, the DSTA judged, was acceptable for the MRCV because of its role as an uncrewed and autonomous systems mothership. This means that it isn’t required to be small and light with a high power-to-weight ratio, as missions that would require those capabilities can be performed by its embarked systems.
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Following the announcement of the new contract signed between Singapore and ST Engineering to build multirole combat vessels, Akash Pratim Debbarma, Defense Analyst at GlobalData, offered his view:

“The contract is part of the modernisation of the Armed Forces of Singapore to secure its maritime boundaries and sovereignty. The country plans to replace its current Victory-class Missile Corvettes (MCVs) with new Multi-Role Combat Vessels (MRCVs) for its navy. The ships are estimated to cost around $200 million each. In addition to bolstering Singapore’s navy, the program to build these MRCVs will also help the country’s local defence sector and gain potential for exports to numerous Asia-Pacific countries.

“While ST Engineering will be responsible for building the MRCVs, Singapore’s Defence Science and Technology Agency (DSTA) and Sweden’s Saab will collaborate in designing the vessels by utilising technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and data analytics. With this partnership with Saab, the DSTA engineers and scholars will have the chance to enhance their technical knowledge, which will help in indigenously developing the capabilities in the industry to undertake the repair of composite structures for ships and radar overhaul.

“Over the years, Singapore has focused on developing its domestic defence industry to reduce dependency on foreign companies. Yet, the nation has kept up its attempts to work with foreign businesses and develop in terms of knowledge, technological transfer, and utilisation of digitalisation.

“Singapore’s desire to jointly develop innovative solutions for the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) is demonstrated by the DSTA’s collaboration agreements with US Lockheed Martin in 2023 and with French Thales in 2022. The engagement with these companies will hasten the development of its domestic defence sector and ensure that the SAF can create technologies with shorter lead times, local expertise, and speedier troop support.”
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sinkies very song or not? Still waiting for the reason why we need this despite having almost no territorial waters to speak off.

MRCV
Multi-Role Combat Vessel - MRCV Picture Credit: Republic of Singapore Navy

DSTA Reveals Origins Of Singapore’s MRCV​

At the Warships 2024 conference held in June in Adelaide, Singapore's DSTA officials shared some new details on the Republic of Singapore Navy's future Multi Role Combat Vessels (MRCV).​

Ben Felton 05 Sep 2024

The Republic of Singapore Navy’s future MRCV, which is set to become the first surface combatant ship designed as a drone mothership, is based on a fusion of designs from Sweden and Denmark.
Designs from Saab Kockums and Denmark’s Odense Maritime Technology (OMT) were initially two separate entrants into the MRCV program.
However, as the process developed, the two companies decided to merge their respective proposals according to officials from Singapore’s Defence Science and Technology Agency (DSTA) speaking at the Royal Institute of Naval Architects (RINA) Warships 2024 conference in Adelaide, South Australia.
The final design, which incorporates elements from both companies’ reference designs, was eventually successful in fulfilling the MRCV requirement – beating out offerings from an unknown number of other companies.
OMT’s initial design was based on an enlarged version of the Royal Danish Navy’s Absalon-class and Iver Huitfeldt-class frigates, modified to meet Singaporean payload requirements and to allow for future payload growth. Saab Kockums, meanwhile, proposed a smaller, corvette-sized, vessel building on the heritage of the Royal Swedish Navy’s Visby-class.
When the designs were merged, design elements, systems and approaches from both reference designs were incorporated into the new design. The companies also agreed to cooperate as if both were equal, despite OMT being formally only a subcontractor to Saab Kockums.
The evolution of Singapore's MRCV.'s MRCV.
A diagram showing the evolution of Singapore’s MRCV. Credit: DSTA
On the OMT side, the MRCV design incorporates the enlarged Absalon/Iver Huitfeldt’s hull lines and structural steel design, as well as its proposed payload management system. Where it differs is on the combat system and propulsion side, where the design takes heavily from the Saab concept, most notably in its use of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic in the superstructure and masts as well as its approach to integrating weapons and sensors.
During the 2023 edition of IMDEX Asia, Naval News learned that the MRCV would have a displacement of around 8,000 tons and a crew complement of about 80 sailors, indicating a high level of automation in the platform. The following sensors and weapons are set to be fitted on the ships:
  • Leonardo’s 76mm naval gun in the STRALES variant;
  • MBDA’s VL MICA NG and Aster B1 NT air defence missiles;
  • ST Engineering / IAI Blue Spear anti-ship missiles;
  • Thales’ SeaFire multifunction radar
  • Safran’s PASEO XLR EO/IR system;
  • Safran’s NGDS decoy launching system.
The MRCV’s organic weapons and sensors, however, won’t be its primary weapons as it is intended as a mothership for autonomous and uncrewed systems. This focus on the platform’s embarked systems is reflected in the design choices made around the MRCV’s power and propulsion systems.
To enable flexibility and growth, the DSTA decided to mandate an Integrated Full Electric Propulsion (IFEP) for the MRCV. IFEP is an arrangement where diesel engines and or gas turbines generate electricity which can be used for both ship services – such as the combat system – and propulsion via electric motors.
The key advantage of this arrangement according to the DSTA is that it is flexible as electricity can be directly moved from propulsion to powering combat systems, or vice versa, as needed. Typically, in other warship designs that incorporate IFEP power arrangements, the electrical system is powered by both gas turbines and diesel engines with the turbines only turning on when power demand spikes.
However, for the Republic of Singapore Navy, this wasn’t an option as it would require them to set up a whole other maintenance, sustainment and training pipeline to support marine gas turbines given that no other Republic of Singapore Navy vessel uses gas turbine engines.

Instead, the DSTA opted for a fully-diesel powered IFEP arrangement which limits the ship’s ability to generate massive amounts of power to enable high-speed operations or faster acceleration. This, the DSTA judged, was acceptable for the MRCV because of its role as an uncrewed and autonomous systems mothership. This means that it isn’t required to be small and light with a high power-to-weight ratio, as missions that would require those capabilities can be performed by its embarked systems.
Size too big, probably for low intensity conflict.

Unlikely to survive in any major crashes that use Anti Ship Missiles
 
Top