• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Since when do we need “foreign talent” to be clinic assistants?

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
[COLOR="_______"]Since when do we need “foreign talent” to be clinic assistants?[/COLOR]

October 1, 2009 by admin
Filed under Top News

According to the Straits Times report yesterday, a 37 year old Chinese national was fined $5,000 for submitting a forged nursing diploma to get a work pass.

Ma Yuqing, however, will serve a default sentence of four weeks’ jail as she could not pay the fine. On Jan 28, she lied to the Controller of Work Passes in her application for an S Pass that she was a nursing graduate from the Chinese university.

She was given an S Pass to work as a medical assistant for J.R. Family Clinic and Acupuncture Centre where she worked until June 9.

The irony of it all is that Ma would still have been granted the S pass even if she did not have the forged qualification.

With due respect to clinic assistants, one does not need any special qualifications to become one. Most clinic assistants require only basic “N” or “O” level passes.

As such, there are many Singaporeans who qualify for the job. Why does J.R. Family clinic need to employ a Chinese national to fill the position?

Singaporeans are told repeatedly by the government that we need both highly qualified professionals and unskilled foreigners to take up jobs that Singaporeans shun such as construction work.

In the past, all the clinic assistants in Singapore are locals. It offers a stable job with a reasonable income and therefore it is unlikely that locals will shun them. Therefore, why are foreigners like Ma allowed to work in Singapore as one on a S-pass?

Besides clinic assistants, foreigners are also taking up jobs that can otherwise be filled by Singaporeans such as tele-marketeers, administrators, IT engineers and even coffeeshop assistants.

Some cannot speak even basic English or English with such a heavy accent which is incomprehensive to locals. Yet, they are able invited to become PRs after working in Singapore for two years. To add salt to the injury, the government is now offering free language courses to them at the expenses of taxpayers!

Though foreigners are needed in certain sectors of the economy, they should be kept strictly out of bounds from jobs like clinic assistants.

The ultimate aim of employers is simply to keep business costs down. Between a foreigner who cost much less than a local, the choice is obvious. But foreigners can survive on with a monthly salary of less than $1,000 as they are living alone here while Singaporeans need to feed their families which explains many do not want to take up these jobs at low pay.

The influx of foreigners had kept the wages of the bottom 20 per cent of the income group stagnant over the last decade. On the contrary, the upper 5 per cent of the income group has seen their wages increased annually with the exception of last year due to the global economic crisis. (Source: singstat)

Mass import of foreigners will surely increase our GDP growth because they produce more at a lower cost. Unfortunately, the fruits of Singapore’s GDP is not spread evenly across the population.

It is time for the government to review its liberal pro-foreigner manpower and immigration policies so that “foreign talent” like Ma can be kept out of Singapore’s shores.
 

wonerman

Alfrescian
Loyal
I have a FUCKING INDIAN Ah Neh in the company employed as a Regional Director, paid $10K a mth, another $3K for housing allowance, who knows not a single business contact in Singapore and everyday barking at the sales people to bring in business and every friday leave the office at 3pm and never come back.

What FUCK is the foreign talent that PAP is talking about? That this foreign talent will create more jobs for locals????

FUCK U LIM SIA SUAY! Upturn my fucking ass!
 

SamuelStalin

Alfrescian
Loyal
I have a FUCKING INDIAN Ah Neh in the company employed as a Regional Director, paid $10K a mth, another $3K for housing allowance, who knows not a single business contact in Singapore and everyday barking at the sales people to bring in business and every friday leave the office at 3pm and never come back.

What FUCK is the foreign talent that PAP is talking about? That this foreign talent will create more jobs for locals????

FUCK U LIM SIA SUAY! Upturn my fucking ass!

Well he still can't afford living beyond a flat-imitate which is a condominium. The sales people have less qualifications and they are the ground talent and should do their best. He on the other hand, doesn't have to sell anything and he gets a reasonable income.

And who should question what the higher people like us do on Casual Day that is Friday? I leave my company at 2 pm to play golf with existing and prospective clients and take them to pubs for a friendly drink at night so what's wrong with that?
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
>>>It is time for the government to review its liberal pro-foreigner manpower and immigration policies so that “foreign talent” like Ma can be kept out of Singapore’s shores.<<<

Nah! It's time for the 66% to wake up their fraking idea and do the wise thing to vote out the Papaya traitors for good and bring them to justice for TREASON!<!-- / message -->
 

kakowi

Alfrescian
Loyal
Nah! It's time for the 66% to wake up their fraking idea and do the wise thing to vote out the Papaya traitors for good and bring them to justice for TREASON!<!-- / message -->


There are 101 great reasons to vote the PAP out.

The Oppositions need to give the 66.6% good reasons to vote them in.

One does not equate to the other.

This is the time for the oppositions to publicise their reasons, to provide compelling reasons. Their effectiveness are measured by the number of people who are willing to give them a try. Out of the 66.6%, it is a fair assumption to say that a significant percentage are heavily disillusioned by the PAP. What is needed now is a compelling reason to vote in the oppositions. For that, the oppositions provided intellectual reasons but not enough real evidence to give them a chance, with the exception of LTK and maybe KJ.

In any case, it is possible that a fair percentage of the 66.6% may be so disillusioned that they are willing to vote just to get the PAP out. If so, that is a sad day for singapore, because it shows clearly how much the PAP has failed in its duty towards singaporeans.
 

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
There are 101 great reasons to vote the PAP out.

The Oppositions need to give the 66.6% good reasons to vote them in.

One does not equate to the other.

This is the time for the oppositions to publicise their reasons, to provide compelling reasons. Their effectiveness are measured by the number of people who are willing to give them a try. Out of the 66.6%, it is a fair assumption to say that a significant percentage are heavily disillusioned by the PAP. What is needed now is a compelling reason to vote in the oppositions. For that, the oppositions provided intellectual reasons but not enough real evidence to give them a chance, with the exception of LTK and maybe KJ.

In any case, it is possible that a fair percentage of the 66.6% may be so disillusioned that they are willing to vote just to get the PAP out. If so, that is a sad day for singapore, because it shows clearly how much the PAP has failed in its duty towards singaporeans.

"The Oppositions need to give the 66.6% good reasons to vote them in."

I find issue with yr this statement. It shld be written as "The govt need to give the 66.6% better reasons to re-vote them in."
 

kakowi

Alfrescian
Loyal
"The Oppositions need to give the 66.6% good reasons to vote them in."

I find issue with yr this statement. It shld be written as "The govt need to give the 66.6% better reasons to re-vote them in."


True.

But that is only one-sided.

Let's assume that the 66.6% vote in the opposition.

Then they cannot perform because they start to bash each other up with hammers and tongs. And they do a more disastrous job with Temasek, Town Councils, singaporeans and foreignporeans, inflation and self-interested actions (you cannot discount the possibility that they will put their wives as ministers and give themselves bigger salaries).

The next General Election, the statement will be written as "The oppositions need to give the 66.6% better reasons to re-vote them in".

Therefore you need to consider both sides of the equation.
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
According to our school's Social Studies Textbook (Sec 3 ), the government consist of
1. Legislature (i.e Parliament)
2. Executive
3. Judiciary

When you vote in a different party with a majority in Parliament, the other 2 arms i.e Executive (mainly the Civil Service) and the Judiciary (the Courts) basically remains the same..

The 85 year old himself has constantly stated that there are checks in place (like Elected Presidency) and our so called best and the brightest(the scholars) are running the civil service and the Courts.So performance in terms of delivery and efficiency will still be there. Its the policy makers (politicians) that will be changed and we should vote for people who understand what Singaporeans (instead of the ruling dynasty) wants and get rid of those greedy lot who pay themselves the highest salary in the world so as not to be corrupt.
 

ccchia

Alfrescian
Loyal
The old man Lee has also stated that any fool can be the PM, as all the systems and the civil service are in place and that the gahmen can run by itself.
 

kakowi

Alfrescian
Loyal
The 85 year old himself has constantly stated that there are checks in place (like Elected Presidency) and our so called best and the brightest(the scholars) are running the civil service and the Courts.So performance in terms of delivery and efficiency will still be there. Its the policy makers (politicians) that will be changed and we should vote for people who understand what Singaporeans (instead of the ruling dynasty) wants and get rid of those greedy lot who pay themselves the highest salary in the world so as not to be corrupt.


A true checks and balance is not just about division of duties.
 
Last edited:
Top