• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Shanmugam, Tan See Leng file defamation suits against Bloomberg, reporter

firehyrant

Stupidman
Loyal
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
16,799
Points
113

Shanmugam, Tan See Leng file defamation suits against Bloomberg, reporter​

In identical Facebook posts on Dec 16, 2024, Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam and Manpower Minister Tan See Leng said that Bloomberg’s article is libellous..

In identical Facebook posts on Dec 16, 2024, Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam and Manpower Minister Tan See Leng said Bloomberg’s article is libellous..PHOTOS: ST FILE

Samuel Devaraj

UPDATED FEB 26, 2025, 11:45 AM

SINGAPORE - Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam and Manpower Minister Tan See Leng have filed defamation suits against Bloomberg and one of its journalists.

The case against the media company and reporter Low De Wei will be heard in the Supreme Court on March 3.

It comes two months after Mr Tan and Mr Shanmugam said they will act against Bloomberg and other media outlets for publishing statements which the ministers consider libellous concerning their property transactions.

The statements were produced in a Dec 12 Bloomberg article on good class bungalow (GCB) transactions in Singapore with the headline, “Singapore mansion deals are increasingly shrouded in secrecy”.

The article was written by Mr Low, who, according to his LinkedIn profile, has been a real estate reporter at Bloomberg since September 2021.

The article focused on GCB deals inked from January to early December 2024, as measured by value, using findings derived from data compiled by Bloomberg News and List Sotheby’s International Realty.

It mentioned property transactions involving Mr Tan and Mr Shanmugam.

In identical Facebook posts on Dec 16, the ministers said Bloomberg’s article is libellous. They added that they will be issuing letters of demand in relation to the article after taking legal advice.

They also said they would be taking similar action against others who have published libellous statements about those transactions.

Checks by The Straits Times showed that Mr Tan and Mr Shanmugam are represented by a team of lawyers from Davinder Singh Chambers including Mr Davinder Singh, Mr David Fong and Mr Bryan Wong.

Mr Remy Choo Zheng Xi, Mr Chua Shi Jie and Mr Donaven Foo from RCL Chambers Law are representing Bloomberg and Mr Low.

Correction directions were issued against Bloomberg under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act on Dec 23, 2024, in relation to the article.

The Ministry of Law said the false statements in Bloomberg’s article “attack the transparency of property transactions in Singapore” and “give the impression that Singapore does not have a robust legal framework to require disclosure of information to the Government in GCB transactions”.

Bloomberg subsequently put up a correction notice on the article but said it had done so under the threat of sanction.

“Bloomberg respectfully disagrees with it, and reserves its right to appeal and challenge the Correction Direction. We stand by our reporting,” it added.

The Edge Singapore, The Independent Singapore and The Online Citizen were also issued correction orders for carrying in part or in full the statements published in the Bloomberg piece.
 
I don't know much about law.
Bloomberg is an American media company, and when they publish anything they think is the truth, why the court Suing process is by sg court?
It should be done by a neutral like UN court isn't it?
 
I don't know much about law.
Bloomberg is an American media company, and when they publish anything they think is the truth, why the court Suing process is by sg court?
It should be done by a neutral like UN court isn't it?
Publishing the truths hurt.
 
Hope Bloomberg is not shivering with fear. PAP ministers are high and mighty and never lost a suit in Singapore court. They have many ways to win a defamation suit. You know l know.
 
I don't know much about law.
Bloomberg is an American media company, and when they publish anything they think is the truth, why the court Suing process is by sg court?
It should be done by a neutral like UN court isn't it?
KNN this question already answered a 100 times during Ridout vs LHY case liao.

Screenshot_1.jpg
 
Fight Bloomberg not so easy. If Bloomberg loses then all news credibility that it publishes will be down the long kang but then again hearing in SG court by single SG judge…foregone conclusion
 
Good that Bloomberg stand by their reporting.
Bloomberg maintained its position: “Bloomberg respectfully disagrees with it and reserves its right to appeal and challenge the Correction Direction. We stand by our reporting.” Both Ministers are sent a clear message that they cannot silence any party that reports news that our politicians do not like.
 
Fight Bloomberg not so easy. If Bloomberg loses then all news credibility that it publishes will be down the long kang but then again hearing in SG court by single SG judge…foregone conclusion
The PAP ministers have "home ground" advantage and no judge in SG will dare to rule against them. Everyone knows what happened to Michael Khoo who was a senior district judge in JB Jeyaretnam's 1986 trial. He found JBJ clear of all charges except 1. The PAP was angry enough to immediately force the AGC to have a retrial and JBJ was sentenced to jail. Michael Khoo was transferred to the AGC immediately after this trial. So much for an "honest" govt!
 
The PAP ministers have "home ground" advantage and no judge in SG will dare to rule against them. Everyone knows what happened to Michael Khoo who was a senior district judge in JB Jeyaretnam's 1986 trial. He found JBJ clear of all charges except 1. The PAP was angry enough to immediately force the AGC to have a retrial and JBJ was sentenced to jail. Michael Khoo was transferred to the AGC immediately after this trial. So much for an "honest" govt!

True la. Moi say moi hansum
 
Fight Bloomberg not so easy. If Bloomberg loses then all news credibility that it publishes will be down the long kang but then again hearing in SG court by single SG judge…foregone conclusion
Bloomberg is NOT the Straits Times, which will capitulate easily to the PAP.
 
Back
Top