• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Shanmugam - opposition offers bad ideas and play your feeling for political gain

†††††

Alfrescian
Loyal
Opposition offers bad ideas and empty rhetoric: Shanmugam
By Rachel Chang

THE opposition in this election has offered only bad proposals or empty rhetoric designed to stoke up anger and disaffection, said Minister for Law and Home Affairs K. Shanmugam yesterday.

Speaking at a People's Action Party (PAP) rally in Yishun Stadium last night, Mr Shanmugam delivered a biting assessment of what he called the opposition's 'primary campaign approach' of playing up emotions for 'pure political gain'.

He characterised the proposals opposition parties have made on housing, economic strategy and the goods and services tax (GST) as all 'somewhere between bad and downright crazy'.

The Workers' Party's (WP) call to peg the prices of new flats to the median household incomes of eligible buyers, for example, would bring the price of all flats down, he told the crowd.

He also said the proposal of Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) candidate Tan Jee Say, a former top civil servant, to phase out manufacturing in Singapore would cause a loss of 500,000 jobs.

'In return, we will rely on the good wishes of our neighbours, to be their service centre. There is only one word to describe this proposal: Crazy.'

Describing this General Election as a fight for 'the soul of our democracy', he said there are two paths the country could take.

On one side is the People's Action Party (PAP), which has delivered decades of good governance. Because the people have put their trust in the PAP for so long, the Government has been able to 'plan long-term, long-range, and choose the most logical plans. That has made it possible for Singapore to be exceptionally successful'.

On the other side is a model in which 'politics means arguing to work up unhappiness against policies, even if the policies are for long-term benefit'.

He said the opposition was already engaging in such politicking, like on the immigration policy.

Opposition politicians have repeated 'over and over' that there have been too many foreigners allowed into Singapore, he said. But they have failed to engage with the substantive questions of 'How many is too many? How exactly will the number be cut back?

'They just try to translate the unhappiness into votes. In so doing, voters are deprived of a proper debate,' he said.

To those voters who want to vote for the opposition to ensure alternative voices in Parliament and scrutiny of the Government, Mr Shanmugam had one proposal.

The elected MP has two broad responsibilities, he said. First, to take care of the constituency, and second, to raise issues and contribute to policymaking on a national scale.

Singapore's Non-Constituency MP scheme allows this to be split up. NCMPs, the 'best losers' from the GE, have limited voting rights but can raise questions and table motions.

In the next Parliament, there will be at least nine opposition representatives. Should less than nine be elected, the balance will be made up by NCMPs.

So he argued that voters should vote for the team which will best take care of their constituency, and rest assured that the opposition 'will get into Parliament in any event'.

Mr Shanmugam also addressed concerns from voters that the PAP leadership does not empathise with the average Singaporean. 'Some tell us, our head says the PAP, but we wish you could do more to appeal to our hearts as well,' he said.

This powerful message, he added, will move the Government to place empathy and connection with its people at the front and centre of its agenda.
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
"Mr Shanmugam also addressed concerns from voters that the PAP leadership does not empathise with the average Singaporean. 'Some tell us, our head says the PAP, but we wish you could do more to appeal to our hearts as well,' he said.

This powerful message, he added, will move the Government to place empathy and connection with its people at the front and centre of its agenda."

You notice, all their promises and statements are now in the future tense? Everything is "we will" "we will" ad nauseum.

And that the "track record" words have disappeared.
 

aangsc

Alfrescian
Loyal
we can understand the group who owned HDB will be upset if price is lower and the group waiting to buy a HDb will be very happy to see lower price but did Shanmugam know why price is moving so high in the 1st place ? Someone in the cabinet proposed that our money is better off in GOVT RESERVE rather than our own cpf account, that bring about the statement of 'raiding the reserve when any attempt to lower HDB price'. It is not fair to expect any solution from opposition, the millionaire ministers create this mess, they should clean it up , make sure both groups of Singaporeans' concerns are address. Do not forget that all ministers are paid millions a year to come up with GREAT IDEAS.
 
Last edited:

mcsmith6

Alfrescian
Loyal
how to address concerns that pap dun empathise with avg sporens?

calling idea of reducing gst as bad and crazy, how to empathise with avg sporens?

fuck you shanmugam. both k shanmugam and shanmugam tharman
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
... To those voters who want to vote for the opposition to ensure alternative voices in Parliament and scrutiny of the Government, Mr Shanmugam had one proposal.

The elected MP has two broad responsibilities, he said. First, to take care of the constituency, and second, to raise issues and contribute to policymaking on a national scale.

Singapore's Non-Constituency MP scheme allows this to be split up. NCMPs, the 'best losers' from the GE, have limited voting rights but can raise questions and table motions.

In the next Parliament, there will be at least nine opposition representatives. Should less than nine be elected, the balance will be made up by NCMPs ...
since tis burger say so goot so goot about ncmp ... kick him out so dat he can bcum n ncmp himself ... :rolleyes:
 

Truebornsingaporean

Alfrescian
Loyal
Shamugam must have not heard about the cause-and-effect diagram (fish bone diagram). In brainstorming, quantity of ideas rather than quality is encourage and frequently a trivial or dumb idea will lead to the best solution.
Criticism of an idea is not allowed. There should be a freewheeling exchange of information that liberates the the imagination.

It seems like PAP do not believe in team participation and brainstorming and exchange of ideas and it seems like most of the decisions is make by few key members of the teams.

Is this consider the way it should be?
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Please remember, Parliament has been dissolved. Mr K. Shanmugam is no more Minister for Law and Home Affairs as Mr. Tan Jee Say is a former top civil servant. That is why Singapore is ranked with Nigeria and Mexico for media reporting standards.

"Tan Jee Say is an investment adviser. He has worked in international banks and asset management institutions such as Deutsche Morgan Grenfell, Govett Asset Management and Standard Chartered Bank, for more than 16 years, and held positions as managing director and regional head of Asia Pacific operations.

Prior to joining the financial sector, he was with the Administrative Service for 11 years, including 6 years in the Ministry of Trade and Industry and 5 years as the Principal Private Secretary to then Deputy Prime Minister, Goh Chok Tong."
<http://ge2011.yoursdp.org/candidate/185/tan-jee-say>

Who is more crazy, letting a person work in the administrative for 11 years, 5 with GCT? Is Mr. Shanmugam, not Minister Shanmugan suggesting that
international banks and asset management institutions such as Deutsche Morgan Grenfell, Govett Asset Management and Standard Chartered Bank, for more than 16 years, are crazy to have employed him as managing director and regional head of Asia Pacific operations? So is Lord Butler of UK also crazy to have vouched for the paper?

"A Tamil Indian, Shanmugam was educated at Raffles Institution from 1972-77, before going on to study law at the National University of Singapore where he graduated with a First Class Honours degree in 1984. He was admitted to the Singapore Bar in 1985. He then went into private practice and became a Senior Partner and Head of Litigation and Dispute Resolution at the Singapore law firm Allen & Gledhill."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K._Shanmugam

"[ Mr. Tan Jee Say]He graduated from Oxford University where he studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics on a Singapore Government Overseas Merit Scholarship."
<http://ge2011.yoursdp.org/candidate/185/tan-jee-say>

Uhm, who is crazy to talk about crazy on economic issues? We are not talking about the law here, we are talking about economic policy, strategy, simulation and projection. Is oxford university crazy to let Mr Tan Jee Say graduate?
 
Last edited:
Top