• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Self-reliance key for S'poreans in the long run

MarrickG

Alfrescian
Loyal
20101203.065200_pmlee.jpg


SINGAPORE'S social safety nets ensure that those in need will get help, but Singaporeans should be more self-reliant in the long run, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday.

He said: "We should never encourage people to rely on handouts, instead of their own efforts."

He was speaking at the Community Care Endowment Fund (ComCare) Appreciation Lunch, to mark ComCare's fifth anniversary.

It was held at the Concorde Hotel and attended by about 450 beneficiaries, grassroots leaders and guests.


Mr Lee pointed to three key elements which make up Singapore's comprehensive set of social safety nets: Keeping people in jobs; getting them to save money for old age; and help from family and the community.

He said: "We want the family to be strong and the family to be the first resort, the first line of support for people who need help.

"(The) system has worked well. It's delivered affordable, targeted, effective help. We've avoided a massive welfare bureaucracy."

Mr Lee said that Singapore cannot adopt a welfare-state system like Britain as the country lacks natural resources and a hinterland.

Britain provides generous unemployment benefits, social payments and pensions.

Funded by high taxes, this has led to trade-offs in growth and competitiveness, he said.

However, Europe was living beyond its means, and cracks showed during the recent financial crisis.

Britain has been cutting back on government spending by one quarter, said Mr Lee.

Speaking about the European situation, he said: "Citizens have grown used to these benefits and, now, to roll back the welfare state is going to cause tremendous upheaval.

"We knew from the start we couldn't afford what the Europeans were trying to do... And, so, we depend on the talent, the energies and the drive of our people."

Mr Lee stressed that Singapore's meritocratic system will not mean that "it's every man for himself", but it will be one of a "community helping one another and progressing together".

Singapore has four pillars to its social-security system, he said.

These are the Central Provident Fund; the "3Ms" - Medisave, MediShield and Medifund; the Housing Board; and Workfare.

ComCare was added around these pillars. It is "not as massive as the others but important when it counts", he said.

He added: "ComCare pulls together the efforts of many different segments of society to help needy and disadvantaged Singaporeans."

Needy families could access ComCare assistance via various channels such as family-service centres and voluntary welfare organisations.

ComCare has since disbursed more than $200 million to help over 160,000 needy individuals and households.

As of March this year, there were 25,200 cases receiving assistance under ComCare.

The ComCare fund, started in 2005, has now reached $800 million, but it is targeted to hit $1 billion.

Mr Lee pledged to continue to improve ComCare, and advised prudence and discipline in the implementation of welfare schemes to prevent them from becoming a "taxing burden".

ComCare beneficiary T. K. Sim, 58, suffered a stroke in June and was forced to temporarily stop working as a taxi driver.

He has received assistance in the form of $100 FairPrice vouchers and transport vouchers worth $30 monthly, from August till October.

He has a wife and two teenage children to support.

Mr Sim said: "I'm grateful for its help, but I think it's best if we can rely on ourselves."
 

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
ya Mr Lee u tok about self-reliance...

how about self-reliance instead of FTs huh?

How about each MP fighting for its constituency instead of relying on GRCs? Lets see the government do that...
 

Tristan

Alfrescian
Loyal
Talk and talk one whole day. I can sumarize what he is saying in just four words: You die your business.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Talk and talk one whole day. I can sumarize what he is saying in just four words: You die your business.

..and he's absolutely right. Why should someone else be responsible for your welfare.:rolleyes:
 

HTOLAS

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Some psychopathic types run by a certain flabby old chap practise an ideology called juché too.
 
Last edited:

rodent2005

Alfrescian
Loyal
..and he's absolutely right. Why should someone else be responsible for your welfare.:rolleyes:

Because we are humans and LHL's wrong policies have caused hardship to many people. If you do not know what being a human means, then forget it.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Because we are humans and LHL's wrong policies have caused hardship to many people. If you do not know what being a human means, then forget it.

Policies don't cause hardship. Stupid people bring about their own hardship.:rolleyes:
 

rodent2005

Alfrescian
Loyal
Welfare in Singapore is an imaginery thing in the sense that Singapore never has a welfare system that costs the country lots of money.

However, Ho Ching has been consistently losing billions for Singapore and this is something that has happened and therefore very real. How come LHL does not spend more time taking action on preventing Ho Ching from losing billions again?
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
u wanna rely on sum1 who gif himself a million $ salary n suppress ur salary 2 ze minimum? ... :o
 

HellAngel

Alfrescian
Loyal
Easy for someone who earn millions to say this. For the average Singaporean, how to save when everything is expensive and a HDB flat would suck up almost all your monthly CPF.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Welfare in Singapore is an imaginery thing in the sense that Singapore never has a welfare system that costs the country lots of money.

However, Ho Ching has been consistently losing billions for Singapore and this is something that has happened and therefore very real. How come LHL does not spend more time taking action on preventing Ho Ching from losing billions again?

Ho Ching contributes to the welfare of countries where our investment failed.
 
Top