sdppies are CRAPS!

[leetahbar]

Oct 7, 2009
SDP five cleared
By Kor Kian Beng, Political Correspondent

THREE leaders and two supporters of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) were acquitted in court on Tuesday of the charge of taking part in an illegal march in 2007.

The SDP leaders were Mr Gandhi Ambalam, chairman; Mr John Tan, assistant secretary-general; and Ms Chee Siok Chin, central executive committee member. The supporters were Mr Yap Keng Ho and Mr Chong Kai Xiong.

The five were cleared of charges of taking part in a procession without a valid permit on Sept 16, 2007. If convicted, they would have faced a fine of up to $1,000 for the offence under the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order & Nuisance) Act.

District Judge John Ng, in a written judgment, said he acquitted the five on the sole ground that he did not consider what they had done a 'procession'.

'The prosecution's position appears to be that so long as a group of five or more people walked from one point to another point in a public place to commemorate an event, the people in that group had participated in a procession for the purposes of the Act...I am not able to agree with such a simplistic interpretation of the word 'procession',' he wrote.

The walk by the SDP five was held to mark the first anniversary of a similar protest planned for September 2006, when the International Monetary Fund and World Bank meetings were held in Singapore.
whether the magistrate charged, jailed or screwed sdppies disciples, there would always be some far fetched comments from those clowns. if they had broken the law, then they would be charged. whe they were charged, they would rant like loudhailers as though they were higher than the law.

now they were set free. magistrate was too sianz with their looney antics. he knew they were broke to poor or even got money also refused to pay. jailing them would be wasting the country's rice.

the wise magistrate decided to free them. such a kind and compassionate magistrate! even after freeing them, they wasn't any words of thanks or appreciationg. the rantings continued.....

typical sdppies disciple - whether u jailed them or free them, there is always lame comments. they are still thinking they are the law and above the law.

CRAPS IS WHAT THEY REALLY ARE!:oIo:

 

[leetahbar]

another confusing and ambiguous feature is occurring too often in SDP. when they claim that their "membership" is enlarging, they already confused many.

note: it's not sdp members they are really boasting about but brain-washed "supporters", i.e. cheapskate clowns who are just too stingy to pay membership to be fully confirmed as "member".

what is the logic behind this "members" and "supporters" thingy? members MUST PAY fees; supporters don't have to. if that's the case, why must the peasants be conned into donating their hard-earned money?

some are not even members or supporters. some could be just "sympathisers" or feeling sorry for the pathetic clowns no different from beggars asking for alms.:oIo:

 

[leetahbar]

why sdppies are CRAPS!?

here's why.

for those who dare not even to voice out their stance but act as though they are holding some vital cec position in SDP, what is the meaning of this? it's not even democratic. it's just a very confusing scenario that many are not even aware of.

but when u realise that those clowns/clownlets unwittingly blurted: "BUT I M STILL PARTYLESS"....when speaking on behalf of SDP, isn't that very misleading? can those words be taken off text as representation from SDP?

if u cannot accept it since the spokeperson claims to be "partyless", then what the hell is SDP? who really are the real representative when more babblings are cuming out from "partyless" trolls?

confusing, isn't it? and if these people were to run your ward in this manner, there would be more confusion which leads to unsolicited sufferings and insecuirty for the society.

it shows that chee soon juan is totally lame and impotent to even straighten out such miniscule matter. to think he could run a ward...may god bless the peasants!

 

[leetahbar]

Judge acquits five SDP leaders and activists
By Ong Dai Lin, TODAY | Posted: 07 October 2009 0703 hrs

Photos 1 of 1

Singapore Democratic Party's logo





SINGAPORE: They have been hauled to court many times for staging protests and other activities in public, with a guilty verdict the regular outcome.

On Tuesday, however, a group of Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) leaders and activists were acquitted of holding a procession without a permit.

On Sept 16, 2007, five of them had marched from Speakers' Corner to Queenstown Remand Prison to mark the first anniversary of a protest led by SDP secretary-general Chee Soon Juan at the World Bank-International Monetary Fund meetings in 2006.

The group, comprising SDP chairman Gandhi Ambalam, assistant secretary-general John Tan, central executive committee member Chee Siok Chin, SDP supporter Yap Keng Ho and human rights activist Chong Kai Xiong, also wore white T-shirts with the words "Democracy Now" and "Freedom Now".

In his written judgment, District Judge John Ng noted that the group had walked mainly on pedestrian pathways and did not attract "any significant" attention of the public.

They also did not carry any of the usual equipment associated with a protest, such as placards or banners, and the walk did not disrupt pedestrian flow.

The judge said: "It was a group of people walking purposefully in a public place from one point to another, but on this occasion, it never amounted to a procession."

He added that there has to be a distinction drawn between "walking in a group from one point to another, even if it was to commemorate an event, and being part of a procession".

When contacted, Institute of Policy Studies senior research fellow Gillian Koh told MediaCorp: "The judgment suggests at face value that there are political activities that seem to be acceptable which we never thought would be allowed."

She said that political activists should look at the previous cases and the specifics of the judgment, and "they would want to be cautious in staging political activities in order to avoid running afoul of various laws".

The five SDP leaders and activists had been charged for participating in a procession without a valid permit. Each of them could have been fined up to S$1,000 if convicted.

and now there is another new category who are not SDP MEMBER but "human rights activist".

this brings us to the next question. human rights activists, are they on its neutral position or representing a political party such as SDP? if they do represent a political party, why then aren't they subscribed themselves as "MEMBERS"? what's the logic behind ths for not bold enough to enrol as "MEMBERS"?

yet, the SDP is claiming that their "membership is growing from strength to strength". isn't this confusing the peasants and putting up a fake picture about their real supports? confusing enough or not?

 

[leetahbar]

BryanT - SDP's sad or happy day? Tue 06 Oct 2009 6:45 PM SDP members and supporters won't know whether to laugh or cry over this acquittal.

Obviously, SDP should be euphoric that the acquittal vindicates what they have done in Sep 07. They could also rejoice that the judge has been amicable enough to interpret the law in their favour.

But I would like to remind SDP that it was let off on what seems like a technicality - the lack of a clear legal definition of "progression". Hence the judge has had to rely on a “natural and ordinary” meaning of the word.

SDP should note that this oversight (ie. lack of definition) can be easily corrected by parliament in future, although personally I think we should let it be, besides the fact it would make the government seem retributive to make the amendment at this stage.

On the other hand, SDP has reasons to be sad because the acquittal DEBUNKS their long-held and oft-repeated insinuation that the judiciary is at the beck-and-call of the ruling party. Here was a case whereby the judge has given SDP the benefit of doubt with regards to the law.

Based on its mindset, whenever judgments were proffered that were not favourable to the SDP, it would make accusations of judges being biased and beholden to the government. This mindset is embodied recent accusations made by its supporters of the type as follows:

- Shame on those lap dogs - the judges, ministers, technocrats, etc who are so educated yet have to suck up to one old
peesai miserable man.

- the ruling party has used the whole civil system like the police, army, media and justice to perpetrate the manipulation and suppression on the people

- Everyone knows kangaroos run our courts!

Now that a judge has shown clear and balanced legal mind to acquit these SDP members, the party and its supporter can no longer lay claims to persistent legal suppression. SDP can no longer deliberately breach laws and then attribute their incarceration to miscarriage of justice.

A principled judiciary is not helpful to SDP's cause since it has essentially lost one of its raison d'être to overhaul the Singapore system.

I know a sparrow does not summer make, but overall it's a sad autumn day for SDP.

as usual, sdp hopes for the worst to have happened to them. but when something really nice happen to them, they are confused and depressed.

 

[leetahbar]

Re: sdppies are CRAPS! - more revelations

BryanT - Street Protests et al Tue 06 Oct 2009 11:34 PM Based on the article, CSJ was imprisoned in 2007 and his supporters carried out a "procession" presumably to raise the awareness of Singaporeans to the plight of their leader sitting in Queenstown Prison. It was probably to invoke the authorities to re-enact its silly and overwrought performance in trying to stop the original 2006 traipse by the SDP gang.

Such are the rehashed techniques employed by the SDP to raise its public profile and create the perception of being suppressed and victimised. The effect to the population is diametric, but that is another story. However, this article reminded me of a statement made by Dennis Bloodworth in his book about the opposition faced by the then pubescent PAP.

Bloodworth wrote about a rhetorical question posed to him by a then Socialist Front leader from KL,"how much does the PAP pay Lee Siew Choh?" Of course Dr Lee was not paid by PAP, but he was treated as God's gift to the PAP because he managed to stick to his cantankerous and vacillating ways with great consistency and managed to "frog-march the Barisan to the cliff-edge of political oblivion".

The SDP, led by Dr Chee, has a propensity to carry out street protests as part of its chosen political strategy. As seen in the article above, it does so by conducting frog-marches and public oratory to appeal to the people and attract the public to its causes and predicament. This impels one to draw a parallel to the performance by the original oafish Doc. Hence a similar rhetorical question is also apt : "How much does PAP pay Chee Soon Juan?"

Of course PAP does not make any monetary offerings to the SDP, and neither would one expect SDP to accept these if offered. However, CSJ's repeated vociferous performances on the streets are incongruous to the political and social realities of Singapore. Singaporeans can be sympathetic to the judicial challenges faced by CSJ and some of his party members, and rejoice with them when they are acquitted as was the case above. But Singaporeans are not indifferent nor blind, and are able to form opinions based on what they discern.

So why the rhetoric question? SDP claims to be at the forefront of political opposition in the country. But through its confrontational ways that has created little impact on and benefit to Singaporeans' lives, the SDP has given the collective opposition group a face that that is rather uncomplimentary. In that, the PAP should be thankful to the SDP, and could have "paid" SDP for its kind service to taint the people's outlook on political opposition in the country.

I have recently made a promise to myself to not just criticise (for the good) but also make recommendations where possible.

In this case, I suggest that SDP review its strategy on engaging the government for the benefit of society. A roguish approach leaves the doors shut to communication, even if one bangs very hard on them.

 

[Alu862]

When you protest like those S Korean workers duringthe Asian Financial Crisies, that the proper justified protesting epeciallly for a global issue.

WB and IMF and first connected to the world economy, growth and poverty reduction. CSJ & Co. protest was NOT on any of these issues. No basis for protesting.

Oct 7, 2009
SDP five cleared
By Kor Kian Beng, Political Correspondent

THREE leaders and two supporters of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) were acquitted in court on Tuesday of the charge of taking part in an illegal march in 2007.

The SDP leaders were Mr Gandhi Ambalam, chairman; Mr John Tan, assistant secretary-general; and Ms Chee Siok Chin, central executive committee member. The supporters were Mr Yap Keng Ho and Mr Chong Kai Xiong.

The five were cleared of charges of taking part in a procession without a valid permit on Sept 16, 2007. If convicted, they would have faced a fine of up to $1,000 for the offence under the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order & Nuisance) Act.

District Judge John Ng, in a written judgment, said he acquitted the five on the sole ground that he did not consider what they had done a 'procession'.

'The prosecution's position appears to be that so long as a group of five or more people walked from one point to another point in a public place to commemorate an event, the people in that group had participated in a procession for the purposes of the Act...I am not able to agree with such a simplistic interpretation of the word 'procession',' he wrote.

The walk by the SDP five was held to mark the first anniversary of a similar protest planned for September 2006, when the International Monetary Fund and World Bank meetings were held in Singapore.
whether the magistrate charged, jailed or screwed sdppies disciples, there would always be some far fetched comments from those clowns. if they had broken the law, then they would be charged. whe they were charged, they would rant like loudhailers as though they were higher than the law.

now they were set free. magistrate was too sianz with their looney antics. he knew they were broke to poor or even got money also refused to pay. jailing them would be wasting the country's rice.

the wise magistrate decided to free them. such a kind and compassionate magistrate! even after freeing them, they wasn't any words of thanks or appreciationg. the rantings continued.....

typical sdppies disciple - whether u jailed them or free them, there is always lame comments. they are still thinking they are the law and above the law.

CRAPS IS WHAT THEY REALLY ARE!:oIo:

 

[leetahbar]

When you protest like those S Korean workers duringthe Asian Financial Crisies, that the proper justified protesting epeciallly for a global issue.

WB and IMF and first connected to the world economy, growth and poverty reduction. CSJ & Co. protest was NOT on any of these issues. No basis for protesting.

sdp as a opp political party never ceases to amaze me. on one hand, they claim they acting out for peasants' welfare but on the other hand they never hesitate to embarrass singapore and create public nuisance that hides a very sinister agenda. how can one not suspect that chee is under the beholden of a foreign financier backer to bring the entire singapore down?

their latest public attention grabbing crap: TRYING TO BULLY SHENG SIONG.:oIo:

 

[leetahbar]

just a simple question to those nasty clones:

ARE U A SDP MEMBER, SUPPORTER, HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVIST OR simply just a sympathiser , i.e., a chobolan kaypohji who's just a troublemaker in the forum? - copyright phrase, so try not to plagiarise, misuse or abuse it.

 

[Schweinmörder]

Erklären, warum beten jeder hasst ihn hier soviel?

 

[guavatree]

just a simple question to those nasty clones:

ARE U A SDP MEMBER, SUPPORTER, HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVIST OR simply just a sympathiser , i.e., a chobolan kaypohji who's just a troublemaker in the forum? - copyright phrase, so try not to plagiarise, misuse or abuse it.

lanjiao sucking unemployed parasite old fart faggot fake monk PAP dog Bob Sim Kheng Hwee,

temple thief, swindler, fraudster, cheat, con-artist, liar, hypocrite, deceiver, betrayer, all rolled into one!

you stole temple donation money and the chief monk told you to fuck off!

you bashed your 80 y.o.father until bloody when he threw away your gay porn!

you called your mother LAUCHEEBYE when she reprimanded you for doing fuck all at home except prostituting yourself round-the-clock in cyberspace!

you also stole handphones and claimed that handphones waved at you!

you steal others forum password!

you tried to con a forummer's property!

you tried to con the same person to include your name in his will when he discovered you tried to con his property!

you cursed an old man at his death bed!

you tried to con laukwayboos but you end up only con some free makan!

 

[guavatree]

just a simple question to those nasty clones:

ARE U A SDP MEMBER, SUPPORTER, HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVIST OR simply just a sympathiser , i.e., a chobolan kaypohji who's just a troublemaker in the forum? - copyright phrase, so try not to plagiarise, misuse or abuse it.

lanjiao sucking unemployed parasite old fart faggot fake monk PAP dog Bob Sim Kheng Hwee,

temple thief, swindler, fraudster, cheat, con-artist, liar, hypocrite, deceiver, betrayer, all rolled into one!

Illicit gay activities:

Penal Code Section 377A states, “Any male person who, in public or private, commits, or abets the commission of, or procures or attempts to procure the commission by any male person of, any act of gross indecency with another male person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years.”

Cheating:

Whoever, by deceiving any person, fraudulently or dishonestly induces the person so deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to consent that any person shall retain any property, or intentionally induces the person so deceived to do or omit to do anything which he or she would not do or omit if he or she were not so deceived, and which act or omission causes or is likely to cause damage or harm to that person in body, mind, reputation or property, is said to "cheat". For example, A cheats if he intentionally deceives Z into a belief that A means to repay any money that Z may lend to him when A does not intend to repay it, and thereby dishonestly induces Z to lend him money. Cheating is punished with imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine, or both.

Father bashing:

Voluntarily causing hurt – A person causes hurt when he or she causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person. Whoever does any act with the intention of causing hurt to any person, or with the knowledge that he is likely to cause hurt to any person, and does cause hurt to any person, voluntarily causes hurt. The penalty for voluntarily causing hurt is imprisonment of up to one year, or a fine of up to S$1,000, or both.

Theft of Temple Funds:

Theft is committed when a person, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that person’s consent, moves that property in order to effect the taking. The penalty for theft is imprisonment of up to three years, or a fine, or both. It is more common, however, for offenders to be charged with committing theft in a building, tent or vessel, which is used as a human dwelling, or for the custody of property. The penalty for this more serious offense is imprisonment of up to seven years, and also a fine.

 

[leetahbar]

Chinese call this 叛国投敌，出逃而受敌国恩惠庇佑。

aren't sdp n chee doing the same to singapore?

 

[leetahbar]

Erklären, warum beten jeder hasst ihn hier soviel?

is that german? why would u wanna be my "friend" ?

 

[Schweinmörder]

is that german? why would u wanna be my "friend" ?

Because u are (how to say it), "benachteiligter"...hmmm the underdog in your language, I think, is that correct, no? U need more friend than people dislike you.

 

[leetahbar]

Because u are (how to say it), "benachteiligter"...hmmm the underdog in your language, I think, is that correct, no? U need more friend than people dislike you.

u must be joking!

people who dislike and full of hatred come mainly as a handful from the petty shapeshifters who are losers and cowards clones.

the mastershapeshift, i.e, my pet snake in my avatar rank the top. clones are easily created by him and can be easily exposed. if he represents SDP just go think what SDP really stands for. yes! u got it!

SDP STANDS FOR FULL OF SHITS!:oIo:

 

[sillygoonz]

u must be joking!

U think scolding your mother laucheebye is a joke?

U think cursing a dying man is a joke?

:oIo: