• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Saying "fuck you" may cost you $6,000 in Sinkieland!

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://mothership.sg/2023/04/man-chase-bus-in-taxi/

SBS Transit bus doesn't stop for man, 73, so he takes taxi to chase after it & say 'f*** you' to bus driver​


chasebus13_censored.jpg



When a public bus failed to stop for 73-year-old retiree Tay Bok Leng, he hopped into a taxi and chased after the bus to give the bus driver a piece of his mind.

After a 5km chase, Tay boarded the bus to shout “f*** you”, “good for nothing”, and other vulgarities at the 67-year-old bus driver.

Tay was eventually arrested and charged with using abusive words at a public service worker and not wearing his mask properly.

He pleaded guilty to both offences and was fined S$6,000 on Apr. 4.


Bus driver didn't see him​

Court documents revealed that the victim was an SBS Transit bus captain who was on duty for bus service number 13.

On Jan. 14, 2022, around 10:50pm, the victim was driving his bus along Lavender Street but did not stop at a bus stop as he failed to see anyone.

However, after he drove past the bus stop, he noticed that Tay and his 68-year-old friend were flagging for his bus.

The victim continued driving as he could not stop the bus safely.

Chased bus on a taxi from Lavender to Still Road​

Tay then hopped into a taxi with his friend and asked the taxi driver to drive along the route of bus service number 13.

When they finally caught up to the bus along Still Road in the Joo Chiat area, Tay asked the taxi driver to let them alight two bus stops ahead of the bus.

Upon boarding the bus at around 11pm, Tay confronted the victim about why he failed to stop the bus.


Shouted all kinds of vulgarities​

While the victim continued to drive the bus, Tay shouted “f*** you” multiple times at him.

He also shouted “b*st*rd”, “good for nothing”, and “rubbish”, amongst other profanities, at the victim.
Tay’s mask was also not over his nose when he lambasted the bus driver.
His friend tried to persuade him to let the matter rest but to no avail.


At least 3 alarmed passengers called police​

The verbal abuse caused alarm to multiple bus passengers, which prompted at least three of them to call the police for help.
The victim subsequently stopped at a bus stop near Marine Crescent, and the police arrived shortly after.
The prosecutor submitted that Tay’s case was on the borderline of the custodial threshold and that any further aggravation would likely have landed him in jail.
She also pointed out that Tay was “vindictive” in chasing down the bus driver just so that he could confront him.

Wanted the bus driver to apologise​

Tay, however, was adamant that the bus driver should apologise to him too.
Shin Min Daily News reported that Tay claimed his “legs were no good“ and could not stand or sit for too long.
He claimed that he had been waiting at the bus stop for 20 minutes just to see the bus leave without stopping.
He also claimed that at least four people were at the bus stop.
However, Tay admitted his wrongdoing when the judge asked him to clarify if he was pleading guilty, and he asked the judge to give him a lighter fine considering he is retired and has no income.



Top image via Facebook/Singapore Buses
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Urm.... but in this particular case, both sides (including Prosecutor) asked for a maximum fine of $5,000! Lying to judge and police officer but fine is lower than if he had said FUCK YOU! lol


Karl Liew Kai Lung, the son of former Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong has pleaded guilty to lying to the judge in the case of migrant domestic worker Parti Liyani at the State Court this morning.
Karl pleaded guilty to one charge of intentionally giving false evidence in July 2018, claiming that a cream polo T-shirt and red blouse belonged to him during the trial of his family's former domestic worker.
The Liew family had accused Ms Parti of stealing items from the family after she was dismissed as their domestic worker in 2016.
During the trial, Karl claimed that a red blouse and a polo T-shirt belonged to him and maintained this position when questioned by Ms Parti's counsel, Mr Anil Balchandani.
Both the prosecution and Karl's lawyer asked for the maximum fine of S$5,000 for Karl.
Karl's lawyer has told the court that Karl was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease at the age of 41, before giving his testimony in the trial.
The judge said he needed time to consider the case and adjourned the sentencing to 14 April.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
might as well take the cab to his destination instead of chasing the bus. for stupidity should be fined at least $6.9k. he should be happy he got a $900 discount.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
The bus did not stop. What did you think he would say? Next bus could be 15 minutes away. Time wasted.
 

Poor Guy

Alfrescian
Loyal
In all unpleasant or abusive situations, we have to try our best to cool down.

Only fight back when necessary ... :smile:
 

LexLuthor

Alfrescian
Loyal
Karl Liew Kai Lung, the son of former Changi Airport Group chairman Liew Mun Leong has pleaded guilty to lying to the judge in the case of migrant domestic worker Parti Liyani at the State Court this morning.
You won't find anywhere in the Penal Code the offence of "lying to the judge". :biggrin:

It's an offence invented by 154th.

If you meet a judge at People's Park kopitiam eating chee cheong fun, and you bullshit him that what he is eating is in fact a used tampon, then you are lying to the judge. If you bullshit the judge at the Court where you are being charged, after you sumpah you are considered lying to the Court.:rolleyes:

If you say “Fuck You !" to the judge when he is eating chee cheong fun at Kopitiam, you will also be fined $5,000. But if you say "Fuck You !" to the judge who is presiding over your case in Court, there is no such offence as "Contempt of the Judge"; only "Contempt of Court".
 
Last edited:

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
You won't find anywhere in the Penal Code the offence of "lying to the judge". :biggrin:

It's an offence invented by 154th.

If you meet a judge at People's Park kopitiam eating chee cheong fun, and you bullshit him that what he is eating is in fact a used tampon, then you are lying to the judge. If you bullshit the judge at the Court where you are being charged, after you sumpah you are considered lying to the Court.:rolleyes:

If you say “Fuck You !" to the judge when he is eating chee cheong fun at Kopitiam, you will also be fined $5,000. But if you say "Fuck You !" to the judge who is presiding over your case in Court, there is no such offence as "Contempt of the Judge"; only "Contempt of Court".
https://singaporelegaladvice.com/law-articles/penalties-lying-authorities-singapore/

Perjury: Lying or Providing False Evidence in Court

Witnesses are expected to tell the truth in court. Before they testify in court, for example, they are required to swear or affirm that they will tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Erroneous productions of evidence and witness accounts in court may not only lead to false convictions, but also squanders resources that could have otherwise been invested in other cases and investigations.

With this in mind, Chapter XI of the Penal Code is dedicated to offences for various situations of falsified evidence and lays out their corresponding punishments.

For example, the punishment meted out for lying or consciously providing false information, despite being legally bound by oath to state the truth, is provided for in section 193 of the Penal Code.

Under this section, anyone who commits perjury and intentionally gives false information, or fabricates false evidence for use in any stage of a judicial proceeding, can be jailed up to 7 years and will be liable to a fine.
 

LexLuthor

Alfrescian
Loyal

Perjury: Lying or Providing False Evidence in Court

Under this section, anyone who commits perjury and intentionally gives false information, or fabricates false evidence for use in any stage of a judicial proceeding, can be jailed up to 7 years and will be liable to a fine.

Yes, it's lying in Court (and not to a judge) and it's called perjury. There is no option for just a fine if you commit perjury.

Clearly, Karl Liewis was not charged for perjury.

Nowhere in CNA and ST news did they mention the word "perjury":

Screenshot_1.jpg
Screenshot_2.jpg
 
Top