• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

S’porean academic Prof Lim defends Dr Thum when others chose to shut the fuck up

micromachine

Lieutenant General
Loyal
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
3,830
Points
113
Mr Yeoh Lam Keong, the former GIC chief economist and adjunct professor at the LKY School of Public Policy, published a letter from Prof Linda Lim on his Facebook page today (13 Apr).

Prof Lim, a Singaporean and the Professor Emerita of Corporate Strategy and International Business at the University of Michigan, is one of the close to 200 world academics who recently signed an open letter supporting Dr Thum Ping Tjin and said that diverse views should be encouraged and not quashed. They defended Dr Thum, who was questioned for six hours last month by the Law and Home Affairs Minister during the Select Committee hearing.

Prof Lim, who was very disturbed by the recent 6-hour grilling received by Dr Thum at the hearing said, "I have written about academic freedom before in Today ('When academics speak their mind, society benefits') and my views there should be referenced as a backdrop to my signing the open letter."

"In this case, the grilling of Dr. Thum - not by his peers in an academic forum, but by a senior government official in a public hearing ostensibly focused on another issue, the problem of 'fake news' — discourages academics from (a) challenging established orthodoxies, which is their role and the process by which progress in knowledge is made, (b) exercising their right and even responsibility as members of civil society to comment on issues of public policy interest," she added.

"In such matters, diverse views are to be encouraged, expected and respected, not discouraged as the truly extraordinary six-hour public interrogation of Dr. Thum will do."

She said that going forward, few people will want to voluntarily share alternative views which are not conforming to official narratives, for fear of risking "hostile persecution by the powerful". As a result, the society will be the "poorer for it", she said.

More at https://www.prolificcrap.com/forum/...mic-prof-lim-defends-dr-thum-when-others-stfu
 
The issue to me is if ok ah thum is correct in his analysis. If what is written is true with supporting evidence than the fuckers is the pap
 
Just an adjunct professor, answer the question, yes or no? :cool:
 
if they can break current laws of physics and cum out with their own laws (such as the comical voting station ruling - once inside radius means both pa ke) don't see how anyone else can win in debates with them. heads they win tails you lose. very simple logic for sinkies to follow also don't understand. :rolleyes:
 
No need talk so much SB70 heypi can riao ..Lol :D

SB70 will not wake up one rah.. next GE will be SB80 riao..lol
 
Back
Top