- Joined
- Apr 9, 2009
- Messages
- 3,070
- Points
- 0
October 13, 2009
Letter by Ms Kaelyn Ong
AS AN avid food blogger, I share my dining experiences, good and bad, with my readers.
I sometimes send an e-mail message to restaurants I have dined at to give them my thanks and feedback.
That was what I did after visiting a food establishment in Singapore I shall refer to as “X”.
I praised X for its decor and also commented that its food could be improved upon.
The next day, I was informed that the restaurant had consulted its lawyers and wanted me to remove my post about it to avoid any legal proceedings.
Are Singapore food establishments that unreceptive to negative feedback?
I understand that restaurant owners are naturally protective about their businesses, but criticisms are meant only to spur them on to improve themselves.
If feedback is not welcome, does that mean that all the emphasis on good customer service is for naught?
I was disturbed that X requested the review be removed because it was not a glowing one.
What does this say about free speech?
If bloggers cannot speak their mind without being threatened with potential lawsuits, what is the point of blogging?
Has this happened to other food bloggers before?
I did not remove the post about X as I did not post anything which could be construed as libel.
There is also a disclaimer on my blog which says that all comments are based on personal preferences.
Food blogging is a personal interest for many of us; it takes time, effort and commitment to maintain a blog.