Respect Euthanasia all you Hypocrites

[Einfield]

I see some religious leaders, Doctors, MP etc all against the idea of Euthanasia.

Some doctors even insist that they should stick tunes all over a dying patient in the name of "Medical Ethics"

Catholic priest and Muslim leaders also chime in to condemn the idea.

All you Hypocrites, who are you to speak for those sufferings, are you in pain and need higher dose of morphine everyday to get by? Do you know what it's like to see your body rotting away, being eaten by cancer cell?

Those who talk cock, are you the one dying?

Obviously not, then you have no right to speak as if you know their pain and sufferings.

All this religious/medical hypocritical bull shit.

I'm 100% for Euthanasia, if you want to end your suffering, then that is your last wish and it should be respected and assisted so you can leave in dignity, don't be a loser and let others tell you what you can and can't do.

Only a mature society understand this highest level of freedom, the freedom to die.

 

[Ramseth]

Actually, I don't understand what's the fuss over euthanasia. It's so simple. When you're ill, terminally ill, and think you or your kins couldn't afford the hospital bills for sustaining you, don't go to hospital. Stay at home bedroom bed and await your final breath. Instruct your kins not to send you to hospital. If they do, they pay.

 

[Bigfuck]

Sure sure. Most happy are insurance companies and governments. No need to pay or pay doctors to misdiagnose to save costs. Sending a peasant to the grave like discarding old equipment to buy new one is easy.

 

[imperialarms]

but i want to end the pain quick

 

[kakowi]

Actually, I don't understand what's the fuss over euthanasia. It's so simple. When you're ill, terminally ill, and think you or your kins couldn't afford the hospital bills for sustaining you, don't go to hospital. Stay at home bedroom bed and await your final breath. Instruct your kins not to send you to hospital. If they do, they pay.

currently, the denial of medicine is already being practised in the case of severely illed patients, with the permission of the deeply distraught next of kin

they are just given food, water and painkillers, giving them the dignity to face their death in a few hours/days time

but this is different from killing them, which is a violation of life itself

the cost of medical treatment can be horrendous nowadays and the person who is illed fear leaving a burden behind for their descendants, yet no one wants to die because life is so precious

in fact, due to the shortage of hospital beds, the terminally illed are often encouraged to be discharged from the hospital and sent to a hospice or their own home

some of the poor dare not go to hospital or afford the emergency a&e charge when they suddenly take a turn for the worst whilst in the hospice or at home

 

[mrbell1009]

LKY should have known this. No point keeping his wife alive.

 

[Bigfuck]

Wah lao! Not before the will and assets of her wife which is his assets are accounted for.

 

[ahbengsong]

as long as euthanasia results in death without pain... it is worth considering...

 

[Bigfuck]

Try running towards the incoming MRT. Once your brain splatters, no worries. Actually hanging is painful. 4 minutes before oxygen run out from brain.

 

[angry_one]

In theory euthanasia is rightful, but in practice it's very hard to differentiate between those who want to die, and those who die due to pressure from their heartless kin. There will also be cases of infighting for the family fortune, and politicking to get the old person to die. So it's gonna be a can of worms.

But i believe the real reason for this, is to free up more space in hospitals by getting rid of the dying. Yes, this will give doctors leeway to just kill off patients just to 'free up resources', perhaps by actively recommending it to the kin of dying patients.

 

[kakowi]

They are already actively recommending it even though there is no AMD in place.

Singapore is fast becoming highly functional, a conveyor belt system for all except for a few.

 

[evisionary]

We have HOTA as an op-out scheme, why not have Euthanasia as an op-in scheme?

 

[Einfield]

But i believe the real reason for this, is to free up more space in hospitals by getting rid of the dying. Yes, this will give doctors leeway to just kill off patients just to 'free up resources', perhaps by actively recommending it to the kin of dying patients.

We all know that when Pappy recommend something, There's always financial benefit behind, the reason used may be a noble one but we all know the real reason behind.

 

[Einfield]

currently, the denial of medicine is already being practised in the case of severely illed patients, with the permission of the deeply distraught next of kin

they are just given food, water and painkillers, giving them the dignity to face their death in a few hours/days time

but this is different from killing them, which is a violation of life itself

the cost of medical treatment can be horrendous nowadays and the person who is illed fear leaving a burden behind for their descendants, yet no one wants to die because life is so precious

in fact, due to the shortage of hospital beds, the terminally illed are often encouraged to be discharged from the hospital and sent to a hospice or their own home

some of the poor dare not go to hospital or afford the emergency a&e charge when they suddenly take a turn for the worst whilst in the hospice or at home

As you have rightly pointed out, Soft Euthanasia is already being practice, all these Hypocrite Doctors that work in hospitals that turn people away because they can't afford treatment and kept their mouth shut all this while, have no right to speak against Euthanasia, as they are all involve, in one way or another, in a system that practice Euthanasia base on financial status.