• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Rebutting NUS Prof Ho Yew Kee's defence of PAP Town Councils

Avantas

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Sep 1, 2008
Messages
1,364
Points
0
Dear Prof Ho,

I am writing in response to your letter published in Straits Times Forum today titled ” Investments by charities and town councils: don’t overreact “.

Why has the investment losses by Town Councils caused a furore in the community ?

It is the non-transparent nature of the modus operandi behind the Town Councils’ investment decisions which raise the irk of many Singaporeans more than the losses incurred itself.

Read full article here:

http://wayangparty.com/2008/12/12/letter-to-nus-assoc-professor-ho-yew-kee/
 
This chap Ho should address the valid and legitimate questions raised by Tan Kin Lian and Gilbert Goh viz the TCs and the their failed investments instead repeating the same thing Teo Ho Pin keeps telling the public.
 
Otherwise why do you think the ST Forum will publish his letter ?

This chap Ho should address the valid and legitimate questions raised by Tan Kin Lian and Gilbert Goh viz the TCs and the their failed investments instead repeating the same thing Teo Ho Pin keeps telling the public.
 
Back
Top