• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Proof that China's past 30 years growth has nothing to do with Commiecunts CCP!.

Devil Within

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Aug 14, 2008
Messages
10,067
Points
113
Studies show that the cities with the least CCP control over businesses, the more growth it has.

Now that Emperor Xi wants to but all businesses in CCP control, expect China to "gostan" to Mao's failed CCP China.


共同富裕是否會換來共同貧窮 大陸經濟學家張維迎有理有據分析 地獄之路由善意鋪成!以實際情況解釋現政策是死路一條!〈蕭若元:理論蕭析〉2021-09-05​


 
We are talking about the distribution of wealth. Less control means more growth but the benefits are not fairly distributed.
Sinkieland is supposed to be the one of the richest countries in the world but does an average Sinkie feel so. Wealth is concentrated at the few at the top. Eg PAP ministers.
 
We are talking about the distribution of wealth. Less control means more growth but the benefits are not fairly distributed.
Sinkieland is supposed to be the one of the richest countries in the world but does an average Sinkie feel so. Wealth is concentrated at the few at the top. Eg PAP ministers.

Equality in opportunities is not the same as equality in outcome. What socialist and communist wants is equality in the outcome no matter if you work hard or not. Equality in opportunities is everyone has the same opportunity to become rich but depends on how hard and eager you want to succeed.

There will always be inequality even in utopia if there is one. As the one who is in power or leadership position will always be "more" equal than others. What is important is that everyone has the same equal chance to get out of poverty and not just end up equal just because the law says so or no one is supposed to be richer than you. Equality in outcome will end up making EVERYONE just as poor.
 
We are talking about the distribution of wealth. Less control means more growth but the benefits are not fairly distributed.
Sinkieland is supposed to be the one of the richest countries in the world but does an average Sinkie feel so. Wealth is concentrated at the few at the top. Eg PAP ministers.
Sinkies import wealth. It's not organically created from within. One reason being the two years of a man's youth wasted in military training when others are busy creating new start ups.

Wealth sharing ideas will eventually lead to destruction of economy. Look no further than jb. Their wealth sharing was suppose to end in 1990. 20 years. But continues till this day despite the failures. Once you give incentives, it's difficult to give it up, especially when it benefits the ruling elites the most.
 
Like I said, you cannot expect much from a primary level educated idiot running the country. However simple the system can be, it’s destined to fail. That said, the good news is, when all dusted and settled, when the country goes back to bicycles and red arm bands (which it seems like what they are trying to create) the world will be more peaceful, cleaner and more quieter
 
Like I said, you cannot expect much from a primary level educated idiot running the country. However simple the system can be, it’s destined to fail. That said, the good news is, when all dusted and settled, when the country goes back to bicycles and red arm bands (which it seems like what they are trying to create) the world will be more peaceful, cleaner and more quieter
Back to the good old days when Malays can ridicule chinese.
 
When u say Chinese, pls be clear about China Chinese and Chinese not holding China nationality
 
It’s been 5.5 months since I left and the malicious dogs cottonmouth aka glockman aka Jeremy Quek as per hint by jw5 (and sweetiepie etc) are allowed by Leongsam to smear and insult me slut whore mistress with no consequence. I have to inform Leongsam to delete the posts and sometimes to no avail and i am sick of it. So Leongsam did not follow his deal to get his moderators to remove posts speaking ill of me so here I am carrying out my vow to spam the forum if cottonmouth is allowed to spam in my threads without consequence - which cottonmouth obviously did and was allowed - and he has been allowed in this 5.5 months no need follow his agreement to stop insulting me and continued to smear and insult me whore just yesterday and insulted me have std one day before that and everyday with no consequence.

Another thing to highlight is I realised after I left forum that @strawberry = @kaninabuchaojibye and I already know @nightsafari = @kaninabuchaojibye i.e despicable nightsafari is the strawberry that started the thread Who is Ginfreely sugar daddy and then keep upping it on the pretext of asking about strawberry. No wonder so pretentious always pretending to like my Hokkien threads while stabbing me non stop.
 
Back
Top