PRC corrupts invented more CREATVE than LEEgime methods of corruption -STILL PUNISHED

[uncleyap]

http://uncleyap-kh.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_14.html


Friday, January 14, 2011

高薪养【贪】假称【廉】，老狗贼李光耀王朝鄙陋手法远不及中国贪官！

新华社新闻链接

<table style="text-align: left; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="600"><tbody><tr><td class="txt18" align="center" height="66" width="600">贪官开始玩儿“雅贿” “钻研”受贿新方法
</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="center" height="22"> 2011年01月13日 15:32:26 　来源： 北京晚报 【字号 大小】【留言】【打印】【关闭】 </td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#000000"> <td align="center">

</td> </tr> <tr bgcolor="#ffffff"> <td align="center" height="2">

</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
<table style="text-align: left; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td height="18" width="100%">
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
<table style="text-align: left; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" id="myTable" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="600"> <tbody><tr> <td class="p1"> 　　区长高价卖犬已过时 受贿变得越来越隐蔽
　　本报昨天报道了门头沟区原副区长闫永喜受审一案，稿件中有闫永喜高价卖犬，并以这种手段收受500万元贿赂的情节。在2007年之前，闫永喜这一受贿手段确实具有隐蔽性，但这几年来，贪官们受贿的新手段层出不穷，给司法机关办案提出很大的挑战。
　　低买高卖已界定为受贿
　　闫永喜伙同情人毛旭东受贿500万，属于典型的打擦边球行为。在2007年之前，不少贪官用“低买高卖”的形式，为受贿披上一层合法交易所得的外衣。
　 　 2007年7月，最高人民法院、最高人民检察院联合发布《关于办理受贿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》，明确规定：国家工作人员利用职务上的便利为请托 人谋取利益，以下列交易形式收受请托人财物的，以受贿论处：以明显低于市场的价格向请托人购买房屋、汽车等物品的；以明显高于市场的价格向请托人出售房 屋、汽车等物品的；以其他交易形式非法收受请托人财物的。新的司法解释一发布，闫永喜高价卖犬这种行为，无疑就属于受贿了。
　　在该司法解释中，还把用赌博赢钱的形式收受请托人钱财的行为明确界定为受贿。
　　贪官们“钻研”受贿新方法
　　不过，贪官们有“钻研”受贿新方法的精神，最近几年，“雅贿”使受贿更难以认定。
　 　一位 检察官举例说，2008年底，原西城法院院长郭生贵被判死缓。在郭生贵一案中，检方指控他收受三幅价值昂贵的名人字画，但法院最终没有认定。去年重庆法院 审理的文强案中，涉案的360万元的字画也未予以认定。据悉，检法两家出现这种分歧，是由于对于字画的真伪和价值没有统一和权威的认定标准，法院认为不能 完全排除对于字画真正价值的合理怀疑。
　　然而，字画的真伪与真正价值如何界定呢？北京法院曾审理过一起赝品案，当时尚在世的大师吴冠中亲自在涉案画作上写下“此画非我所画”，但法院最终却没采信吴老的证明，因为在古玩书画界，作者本人的证明并不算数。

</td></tr></tbody></table>

<table style="text-align: left; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr> </tr> </tbody></table>
<table style="text-align: left; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" id="myTable" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="600"> <tbody><tr> <td class="p1"> 　 　“雅 贿”使贿赂的数额难以认定，这是目前“雅贿”行为渐多的原因之一。此外，古玩字画收藏界所特有的“捡漏”、“打眼”行规，也给一些贪官提供了受贿的新方 法。行贿者精心安排后，带贪官去古玩店“闲逛”时低价买了个被认为是赝品的古玩回来，后来一鉴定，发现是真品，于是，该贪官“捡漏”大赚了一笔。
　　反贪部门在办理自侦案件中，碰到不少隐蔽的行贿方法。除了“雅贿”外，还有开发商卖给贪官家人房子，然后故意一房两卖，贪官家人告到法院后，开发商再通过法院判决，支付给贪官家人一定的赔偿。
　　隐蔽受贿增添办案难度
　　对于这些形形色色的隐蔽的受贿形式，司法机关如何应对呢？检察官表示，如果有足够的证据，就都能归到“以其他交易形式非法收受请托人财物的”这一条里，但这确实给检方办案增添了不少难度。（记者杨昌平）

</td></tr></tbody></table>



​

以上新闻证明贪污腐败的手法再高明也逃不过聪明的人民雪亮的眼光，贪官无法避免严厉的刑法。

中国的贪官被称为【雅贿】，那我坚持老狗贼李光耀的贪财腐败烂招应该被称为【廉贿】【超高薪贿】！拆穿了【廉贿】就是-高薪养【贪】假称【廉】！

是最不要廉最该严惩重罚的贪污腐败罪行。原因是它们不但只是贪财腐败，还扭曲法律来保护自己的腐败。这个招是烂招。

中国的贪官也想得到，安排滥用法庭去告人赔巨款来贪污。老狗贼李光耀不就是经常不断的滥用法庭控告他人诽谤来捞取巨额赔款的吗？中国的贪官这样滥用法庭来贪污，最终被坐牢枪毙，那我坚持老狗贼李光耀的李家王朝绝不能轻率放过！必须以死刑问罪！




posted by uncleyap at 1:29 AM

 

[uncleyap]

Re: PRC corrupts invented more CREATVE than LEEgime methods of corruption -STILL PUNI

http://uncleyap-news.blogspot.com/2011/01/prc-punished-corrupt-officials-who.html


Friday, January 14, 2011

PRC punished corrupt officials who Invented smarter corruption stunts than famiLEE LEEgime salaries

Related Chinese blog post URL

Related XinHuaNet.Com news URL

I found today on xinhuanet.com, the PRC official news agency, that the PRC govt had punished corrupted officials who tried to accept bribes through complicated attempts to exploit legal loopholes to escape punishments. These methods are CREATIVE and DEEMED VERY LEGAL. But the corrupts did not manage to escape punishments - which in PRC can easily and usually mean a bullet from the firing squad.

The reported loopholes in the above report and other reports that I have read this week, are from recent high profile cases. A medical drug bureau chief had been lucratively selling professional medical books at very high price, this is a legal form of income under Chinese and even Singaporean laws. Medical suppliers and drug makers had to please this corrupted bureau chief by purchasing many copies of these expensive professional books - which are totally relevant to their line of profession. But this smart cover still got blown and the corrupt is now on trial in PRC court.

There are other cases of corrupted PRC officials, found to be legally making lucrative profits out of purchasing and selling high priced art collections. The law in PRC now revised that any such gains or profits by selling high then what the officer had paid for any these arts or properties is recognized legally as a form of corruption.

To connect this revision of law to famiLEE LEEgime's notorious case of HPL corruption scandal Lee Kuan Yew's son Lee Hsien Loong when serving as Deputy Prime Minister had purchased below market prices 2 units of luxury mansions (Nassim Jade if I recall correctly) from a developer related to his own nepotism ring. For attempting to expose this scandal famiLEE sued Mr. Tang Liang Hong a Workers Party Parliamentary Candidate who contested Cheng Shan GRC with late Mr. JB Jeyaretnam. This form of corruption is now officially recognized as a punishable crime of corruption as declared in Chinese court of law.

To abuse the court as a tool for corruption, the PRC corrupts had made complicated arrangement so that they can have legitimate grounds to sue their interested parties in court for huge sum civil suits from which these corrupts will get judgments in their own lucrative favor. And collecting these court ordered payments are fully legitimate while however it is indeed just covered up channel arranged to collect huge sum of bribes. Isn't that smart? But then they did not managed to escape punishment eventually when the Chinese people found out!

To relate this channel I would like readers to consider the notorious facts that Lee Kuan Yew famiLEE had constantly been suing publishers and politicians for huge sum of defamation DAMAGES. Did the Chinese corrupts took reference from famiLEE LEEgime's stunts to abuse civil suits? :-) You decide!

I have insisted that Lee Kuan Yew famiLEE LEEgime's world-unique invention which that shameless old dog thief is personally promoting around the whole world, is what I called a OBSCENE AMOUNT OF SALARY GRAFT.


posted by uncleyap at 1:53 AM

 

[da dick]

Re: PRC corrupts invented more CREATVE than LEEgime methods of corruption -STILL PUNI

complex != creative. pappies just change any laws they don't want to break. piece of cake. northern barbarians in beijing are too busy backstabbing each other to effectively do that.

 

[uncleyap]

Re: PRC corrupts invented more CREATVE than LEEgime methods of corruption -STILL PUNI

complex != creative. pappies just change any laws they don't want to break. piece of cake. northern barbarians in beijing are too busy backstabbing each other to effectively do that.

famiLEE LEEgime's changes to law to LEEgitimze own satisfaction of GREED can not be upheld by any law / enforcement / penal forces of people. Because it is attempt to corrupt and defeat purposes of law, their false LEEgitimizations are NULL & VOID, can not be honored, can not cause any obstruction to penalize their own corruption, no matter how they would try to twist and turn.

There is enough legal substance demonstrated by the PRC judiciary and enforcement that, even Order Of Court & Judgments from court becomes illegitimate when they are found to be abused and crafted by corruption culprits in attempts to cover their own ass.

This is what famiLEE LEEgime is doing, covering their own ass by plundering their grafts concealing the loots as salaries. This false legitimacy is thus NULL & VOID.