<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>S'poreans too complacent about public health issues
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->IN THE Geylang Serai mass food poisoning case, more than 150 people became ill, two adults died and a pregnant victim miscarried.
Singaporeans must shed their "it won't happen to me" complacency and be more assertive on public health issues that can affect them and their loved ones.
Reactive instead of proactive public health officials, indifferent food handlers and an apathetic public are the perfect ingredients for public health disasters.
I suggest the National Environment Agency (NEA) implement the following three-pronged strategy:
- Mount an effective public campaign to educate food-loving Singaporeans on the dangers of food-borne diseases. Show microscope pictures of germs like E. coli and salmonella so the message sinks in. Videos of various unhygienic practices in food outlets should also be shown.
- Appeal to Singaporeans to act as extra pairs of eyes and as whistle-blowers on unhygienic practices. Set up a 24/7 toll-free NEA hotline. Assure all whistle-blowers that their feedback will be handled speedily and confidentially.
- Continue with surprise checks, backed by strict and tough enforcement. But replace the confusing ABCD grading system with a pass-or-fail system. A hawker is either hygienic or not hygienic. A zero-tolerance approach is urgently needed. Hawkers with "fail" grades must buck up before their licences are renewed. Those who pass must maintain hygienic practices, or be given demerit points. If they chalk up a certain number of demerit points, suspend their licence for longer periods than the current two weeks. See Leong Kit
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->IN THE Geylang Serai mass food poisoning case, more than 150 people became ill, two adults died and a pregnant victim miscarried.
Singaporeans must shed their "it won't happen to me" complacency and be more assertive on public health issues that can affect them and their loved ones.
Reactive instead of proactive public health officials, indifferent food handlers and an apathetic public are the perfect ingredients for public health disasters.
I suggest the National Environment Agency (NEA) implement the following three-pronged strategy:
- Mount an effective public campaign to educate food-loving Singaporeans on the dangers of food-borne diseases. Show microscope pictures of germs like E. coli and salmonella so the message sinks in. Videos of various unhygienic practices in food outlets should also be shown.
- Appeal to Singaporeans to act as extra pairs of eyes and as whistle-blowers on unhygienic practices. Set up a 24/7 toll-free NEA hotline. Assure all whistle-blowers that their feedback will be handled speedily and confidentially.
- Continue with surprise checks, backed by strict and tough enforcement. But replace the confusing ABCD grading system with a pass-or-fail system. A hawker is either hygienic or not hygienic. A zero-tolerance approach is urgently needed. Hawkers with "fail" grades must buck up before their licences are renewed. Those who pass must maintain hygienic practices, or be given demerit points. If they chalk up a certain number of demerit points, suspend their licence for longer periods than the current two weeks. See Leong Kit