• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PMET / Nationality and Statistics that Don't reveal much.

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
It was nearly 26 years ago, that Singapore emabarked on a policy of value add and began the closure of textile factories in Jurong where many Singaporeans were employed. It was a logical move that paid dividends and allowed Singaporeans to take up skilled work.

Eventually labour sectors began to be identified by nationality, an interesting phenomenon. Foreign Indians and Thai became the bedrock of the construction industry. Filipinas became maids, Malaysians from across the border made up the bulk of factory workers. Singaporeans began to move in large numbers into PMET.

Stereotypes began to form and both the employer and employee ended up following these stereotypes even when pay was attractive enough. A case in point is the vocation of tower crane operator.

Some where along the line, the government and the people lost track of the basic rule of governance - employment for its citizens.

This maybe the opportune time to effect a paradigm shift and go back to first principles of good governance.

Maybe, high growth is too much to ask. Maybe, nationhood should be back on the agenda. Maybe, the Emmigration policy to allow for brain drain and to counter bellow par replacement birth rate needs to be relooked, Maybe, its time to recognise foreigners for their commitment in terms and years in a more transparent way.

And maybe, hiding behind the pink curtain might not be the answer.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
And maybe, hiding behind the pink curtain might not be the answer.

i thought the taxman says this every year: "thank you for your contribution towards nation building." you meant we hadn't been building the nation well enough? :biggrin::p:biggrin::p
 

Ah Guan

Alfrescian
Loyal
Local PMETs is the voter-segment the gahmen should be most worried about

Imagine what questions 2 thousand jobless senior execs and professionals would bring up in their blogs? Imagine just 5 out of this group stand for election?

Haha... Pro-FT policy will bite them in the arse
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Local PMETs is the voter-segment the gahmen should be most worried about

Imagine what questions 2 thousand jobless senior execs and professionals would bring up in their blogs? Imagine just 5 out of this group stand for election?

Haha... Pro-FT policy will bite them in the arse

Agree. One also has to bear in mind there are technicians in there as well and this was the very segment that was created to ensure that it captures the lower end of the skill segment of Singaporeans.
 

Ah Guan

Alfrescian
Loyal
Agree. One also has to bear in mind there are technicians in there as well and this was the very segment that was created to ensure that it captures the lower end of the skill segment of Singaporeans.

If I may say so, technicians (blue collar machinists or white collar server/network operators) are the most vulnerable group in the FT tsunami and times of recession.

They are relatively expensive to train and paid the least in the group. For IT staff, the technology gets obsolete in about 3 years.

Many have been badly fucked by the outsource/offshore initiative and end up driving taxis or becoming property agents.

 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
If I may say so, technicians (blue collar machinists or white collar server/network operators) are the most vulnerable group in the FT tsunami and times of recession.

They are relatively expensive to train and paid the least in the group. For IT staff, the technology gets obsolete in about 3 years.

Many have been badly fucked by the outsource/offshore initiative and end up driving taxis or becoming property agents.


Thats really sad to hear. I was aware that MNC having factories hear was pleading for cheaper machinist from India. In fact, during the 1st wave, many Singapore technicians migrated to Australia when they saw the signs. Usually for the aeronautical and automobile industry. I guess they were the lucky ones.

A lot of them were trained by German and Japanese interest here. Hard to replace skills.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
Local PMETs is the voter-segment the gahmen should be most worried about

Imagine what questions 2 thousand jobless senior execs and professionals would bring up in their blogs? Imagine just 5 out of this group stand for election?

Haha... Pro-FT policy will bite them in the arse

hmm... so i guess the new Citizens imported still doesn't tip the balance... :p:p:p
 

Ah Guan

Alfrescian
Loyal
hmm... so i guess the new Citizens imported still doesn't tip the balance... :p:p:p


Gahmen is coming to terms during this recession that new citizens and PRs cannot be depended upon

How many have abandoned ship and gone back to their villages for fresh air, clean water and wide open spaces?

In any case, PMETs (especially good ones) are exceptionally mobile in the global labour market. Local and foreign PMETs can flow in and out of sinkapore like water.

Still boils down to the same questions: we serve NS for fuck? what can sinkapore offer FTs that doesn't work for us?
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
Still boils down to the same questions: we serve NS for fuck? what can sinkapore offer FTs that doesn't work for us?

in this case, the question in mind shouldn't be "we serve NS for fuck?", but rather, a clear vision that states so loudly and boldly "we served NS & kena fucked"
 
Top