• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PM Lee say WP propose a system too welfare not realistic la

†††††

Alfrescian
Loyal
GE: Workers' Party says manifesto is revenue-neutral in many areas
By Imelda Saad | Posted: 13 April 2011 2333 hrs

SINGAPORE: The Workers' Party has defended its manifesto, saying it welcomes public scrutiny because it wants to be transparent - a response to PAP's call for Singaporeans to take a close look at the manifesto of opposition parties.

One area highlighted (by the PAP) was how the Workers' Party would fund some of its proposals.

At a forum aired on Channel NewsAsia Tuesday evening, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had taken issue with what he called a "welfare system" the Workers' Party seemed to be proposing.

In response, the Workers' Party said it did not produce its manifesto on the basis that there was a "bottomless pit of money to spend".

It has in fact advocated for spending cuts in many areas, and what it is calling for, is the re-allocation of resources.

"We did consider the cost impact of a lot of these proposals. In fact we counted we have about 220 over proposals inside and of those, the vast majority of them do not entail any spending increases, they are just revenue-neutral," said Mr Gerald Giam, assistant webmaster and Worker's Party executive council member.

- CNA/cc
 
Top