PLA revelation 4th Gen Nuke test by supercomputer simulation 200Xs in the last 40 months

[tun_dr_m]

There is no mega quakes detected, there is no mushroom clouds seen. Because Chinese supercomputers are used to simulate nuke test of their 4th Gen Nuke prototypes. Already 200 times within the previous 40 months.

And when Chinese reveal this, my guess is they had already perfected their 4th Gen nuke design ready for a real detonation test very soon.

4G nuke is PURE FUSION Nuke just like the Chinese 4G nuke power stations. It does not need any uranium fuel and it is clean and can be made at ANY SIZE, no minimum critical mass, no max limitation, isotope of hydrogen is the fuel, and radiation subsides soon after the giant fireball cooled off.

China is far ahead of the globe in nuke technologies.

4G nuke can thus be used also a rocket of unlimited range without polluting environment. Putin has a 3G version of that among his recently revealed 6 types of irresistible nukes during his re-election campaign. Europe KBKB cried radioactive pollution from Putin's nuke rocket tests, causing alarming radiation levels in EU's air. Doing a nuke rocket in 3G pollutes the air very badly. 4G is OK.



http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2018-05-30/doc-ihcffhsv5080320.shtml

中国加快研发新型核武 40个月内进行200次模拟核试验
中国加快研发新型核武 40个月内进行200次模拟核试验

0

　　使用超级计算机模拟核试验的场景

　　中国正在加快研发新一代核武器的步伐，与此同时，中方进行核试验的频率比美国频繁。据美国《国会山报》28日报道称，据中国工程物理研究院统计，2014年9月至2017年12月，中国进行了200次核试验，也就是月均5次。中国正在开发一种近距离战争使用的战术核武器。同时，该报指出，美国每月核试次数不超过1次，只是中国的五分之一。据劳伦斯伯克利国家实验室的数据统计，2012年至2017年，美国共进行50次核试验。按照美国的新核原则，美国将制造小威力核弹药来制衡俄中。

　　真实核试验所需费用和污染都很大

　　首先必须说明白，上面所说的核试验，并非真正的进行空爆或地下核试验，而是只有世界超级大国才掌握的超级计算机仿真模拟核试验。这是因为除了极个别的新晋核门槛的国家之外，原本的联合国安理会五大常任理事国，均已具备进行超级计算机仿真模拟核爆炸的能力，也就是说，这些国家不需要再进行真实的核爆炸，只需通过高性能计算机的模拟试验，就能得到和真实的核试验一样的数据，从而避免了实际核试验所带来的污染和巨额支出。

　　美国仿真模拟核试验所使用的超级计算机

　　也正是因为美国率先掌握了超级计算机仿真模拟核试验技术，所以才在1996年9月24日推动签署了《全面禁止核试验条约》，从此各个超级大国的核试验进入了计算机模拟时代。当然，越来越精密的超级计算机模拟核试验也需要运算速度更快的超级计算机，这促使各国陷入了超级计算机竞赛之中，近年来中国的“神威·太湖之光”和“天河二号”多次跃居世界第一的宝座，充分说明了中国在这方面的实力。而美国是拥有超级计算机数量最多的国家。

　　中国的神威之光曾长期排名世界第一

　　现在，在超级大国之中，使用超级计算机进行仿真模拟核试验已经成为普遍的现象，尤其美俄中都是这方面的佼佼者。根据美媒的说法，中国在40个月内进行了200次核试验，那么平均下来就是每月5次。很明显，由于在核武器小型化和现代化方面与美俄差距较大，因此必须进行的核试验次数一定更多，惟有如此中国才能加速追赶世界先进水平。而美国的呢，都是围绕着特定目标而进行新的试验，比如正在试验制造小威力但应用范围更广泛的新一代核武器，主要就是为了对付中俄而研发的。

　　中国新型导弹需要满足需求的新核弹头

　　分析认为，由于进行超级计算机仿真模拟核试验并不会像实际核试验那样容易为外界所知，所以，美国所谓的中国每月5次核试验也仅仅是推测而已，但却由此证明中国对于新型先进核武器的渴求程度是急迫的。同时，目前中国的东风-26、东风-31A/B、东风-41、东风-5C、巨浪-2A、巨浪-3、长剑-20等导弹开始大量服役，它们所需要的各类新型核弹头都必须专门研发和试验，所以，在美国巨大的战略压力下，中国必须尽快改变目前不对等的核态势。当然，即便中国真的进行如此数量的核试验，也与美俄实际进行的核试次数不能相提并论。更重要的是，美俄的核武器数量足够多也足够先进，即便它们只是进行少量的核试验，其在核武器技术领域的高度，也需要中国在很长一段时间里加速追赶，才能由望其项背到逐步实现跟跑。（作者署名：军评陈光文）





1 yr ago


2 yrs ago


1 yr ago


2018



China Accelerates R&D of New Type Nuclear Weapons Performs 200 Simulated Nuclear Tests in 40 Months
China Accelerates R&D of New Type Nuclear Weapons Performs 200 Simulated Nuclear Tests in 40 Months
0

Using a supercomputer to simulate a nuclear test scenario

China is speeding up the development of a new generation of nuclear weapons. At the same time, China conducts nuclear tests more frequently than in the United States. According to the report of the US “Capitol Hill” on the 28th, according to statistics from the Chinese Institute of Engineering Physics, from September 2014 to December 2017, China conducted 200 nuclear tests, which is 5 times per month. China is developing a tactical nuclear weapon used in close combat. At the same time, the newspaper pointed out that the United States does not have more than one nuclear test per month, only one-fifth of China's. According to statistics from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, from 2012 to 2017, the United States conducted a total of 50 nuclear tests. In accordance with the new nuclear principles of the United States, the United States will create nuclear weapons to control the balance between Russia and China.

The costs and pollution of real nuclear tests are very high

First of all, it must be stated that the nuclear test mentioned above is not a real air blast or underground nuclear test, but only a supercomputer simulated nuclear test that is only controlled by the world's superpowers. This is because in addition to the very few countries that have new nuclear thresholds, the original five permanent members of the UN Security Council already have the ability to perform supercomputer simulations of nuclear explosions, that is, these countries do not need to carry out real The nuclear explosion can only obtain the same data as a real nuclear test just through high-performance computer simulation tests, thus avoiding the pollution and huge expenditures caused by actual nuclear tests.

U.S. Simulation Simulated Nuclear Test Using Supercomputer

It was precisely because the United States took the lead in supercomputer simulation and simulation of nuclear testing technology. It was only on September 24, 1996 that it had promoted the signing of the "Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty." Since then, the nuclear tests of superpowers have entered the era of computer simulation. Of course, more and more sophisticated supercomputer simulation nuclear tests also require supercomputers with faster computing speeds, which has pushed countries into the supercomputer competition. In recent years, China’s “Light of Shenwei·Taihu Lake” and “Tianhe-2” The number one leap to the top of the world has fully demonstrated China's strength in this area. The United States is the country with the largest number of supercomputers.

China's Divine Light has long been ranked first in the world

Now, among the superpowers, the use of supercomputers to simulate nuclear tests has become a common phenomenon, especially in the United States, Russia and China. According to the US media, China conducted 200 nuclear tests within 40 months, so the average is 5 times a month. Obviously, because of the large gap between the United States and Russia in terms of the miniaturization and modernization of nuclear weapons, the number of nuclear tests that must be conducted must be even more so that only China can accelerate its catch up with the world advanced level. The United States, on the other hand, conducts new tests centered on specific goals. For example, the new generation of nuclear weapons that are being tested for the production of small but more widely applied nuclear weapons is mainly developed for the purpose of dealing with China and Russia.

New Chinese missiles need new nuclear warheads that meet demand

According to the analysis, since supercomputer simulations and simulations of nuclear tests are not as easily known to the outside world as actual nuclear tests, the so-called China’s five monthly nuclear tests are merely speculations, but they prove that China is The degree of craving for new advanced nuclear weapons is urgent. At the same time, China’s Dongfeng-26, Dongfeng-31A/B, Dongfeng-41, Dongfeng-5C, Julang-2A, Julang-3, and Longjian-20 missiles have begun to enter service in large numbers. Nuclear warheads must be specially developed and tested. Therefore, under the huge strategic pressure of the United States, China must change the current unequal nuclear situation as soon as possible. Of course, even if China does carry out such a number of nuclear tests, it cannot compare with the actual number of nuclear tests conducted by the United States and Russia. More importantly, the number of US and Russian nuclear weapons is sufficiently large and advanced enough. Even if they only conduct a small number of nuclear tests, their height in the field of nuclear weapons technology also requires China to accelerate its catch-up for a long period of time before it can gradually reverse its progress. Realize follow-up. (Author's signature: Military Review Chen Guangwen)

 

[tun_dr_m]

2016:


2016:


Chinese uses supercomputer emulations to try out all their designs and get their results without building actual devices for test, and avoided expensive failures and save tremendous amount of time. That is why they are far ahead of all the rest especially loser Ang Mohs. All the weapons and hightech got help in China from their world's top supercomputers.

Supercomputer is most important tool, that you win in this one, you can win in ALL other sciences. When your supercomputer is the top you will get far ahead of all others in many other fields of sciences. From nuke to medical to Meteorological Forecast to secret encryption key cracking to bit-coin mining.

2nd video shows hydrogen from electrolysis of water is used as nuclear fuel. It is clean because it' half life is shortest unlike the uranium that half life = 4.5 billion years. Hydrogen half life = 10min! Tritium (isotope of hydrogen = cousin) half life = 12.3 years.

That is why 4th Gen is clean because their radio activities dies off fast after nuke reaction cools. Hydrogen radiation dies in 10min, which is faster than then nuke fireball can cool down. It gives a lethal flash of radiation during the fireball bang bang time. After that radiation stops.

PLA can nuke over a city can capture it occupy it after it cooled down. Can nuke an aircraft carrier over their head and capture it's hull tow it back or marine salvage it as trophy of victory.

Chinese marine salvage strength technique and skill is #1, Proven by Korean Sewol ferry.

 

[Leongsam]

Garbage in garbage out no matter how "super" a computer is.

The chinks can't program to save their lives. They need to hire some world class Ah Nehs to code for them.

 

[Truth_Hurts]

Yanks also using super computers. That is why there has been no nuclear tests for decades by the yanks. Last one was by the frogs...blew up a bomb in the Pacific n pissed off the Aussies

 

[tun_dr_m]

Chinese made super materials that are stronger than steel by 60X and as light as carbon, using supercomputer. Meaning warplanes warships tanks and submarines can be stronger lighter and dives deeper.

Also made super material that has NEGATIVE Refractive Index, meaning radio wave (radar) bends around the Chinese Warplanes instead of reflecting. Hence is totally transparent to radar, this also using supercomputer.

Chinese made super good radar designs & strongest Terahertz radars also using supercomputer.

http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-05-30/doc-ihcffhsv4342479.shtml

中国歼20新照引关注 拿下隐身测试让雷达再无战绩
中国歼20新照引关注 拿下隐身测试让雷达再无战绩

0
　　网曝歼-20新图引关注

　　拿下隐身测试 让雷达再无“战绩”

　　本报记者 张 强

　　近日，一张歼-20被放置在高大支架上的图片引起了军迷关注。有专家分析这是在对歼-20的雷达散射截面积（RCS）进行测试。与此同时，还有一则新闻也在持续发酵。有网络媒体报道称，“中国首次公开掌握战斗机隐身测试一关键核心技术：RCS测试”。

　　那么，到底什么是RCS测试？它对隐形战机的研制有哪些推动作用？其又为何被称为战机隐身测试的核心技术？

　　RCS是衡量战机隐身性能的重要指标

　　RCS是雷达隐身技术中最关键的概念，它表征了目标在雷达波照射下所产生回波强度的一种物理量。通俗地说，RCS就是雷达能看见的面积大小。

　　“雷达应用于军事后，雷达的散射截面积成为其中一个最重要、最基本的参数。”瞭望智库特约研究员易芳介绍，20世纪五六十年代为识别洲际导弹真假弹头，八十年代由于飞行器的隐身与反隐身技术需要，使RCS的研究出现两次高潮。此后，鉴于RCS的重要价值和意义，过渡到应用RCS技术进行测试试验，用来设计和改进武器装备，提高隐身性能，以应对雷达侦察、监视、跟踪与目标识别。

　　易芳指出：“目前军事强国已经将RCS作为衡量军舰、飞机、导弹等装备隐身性能的重要指标。因此，RCS技术一方面被广泛运用于此类装备的设计、研究和制造，整机RCS测试成为鉴定隐身装备是否合格的最后一道程序；另一方面，通过RCS的技术融合，实现对目标运动姿态判别、目标结构和尺寸评估、目标类别的识别，以及区分目标真假，甚至还可以利用RCS测量结果合成目标图像。”

　　通常情况下，雷达目标材料的电性能和吸波性能、目标的几何外形、目标被雷达波照射的方位、入射波的波长等因素都会对目标的RCS产生影响。比如，飞机、导弹的头部方向RCS最小，而两侧和尾部RCS较大。再比如，“战斧”巡航导弹的RCS小于0.1平方米，仅仅相当于一只鸟。

　　2014年的一篇报道指出，俄罗斯苏霍伊设计局的设计人员成功地将T-50隐身战斗机（即苏-57）的雷达反射截面积降至最低仅0.1平方米。为了有效降低T-50的RCS，设计人员采用了特殊的机体外形设计方案，完全内置的武器舱和S型进气道布局。此外，在其进气道表面还覆盖有一层能够吸收雷达波的特殊材料。同时，T-50机体各组成部分之间的空隙中还填充有导电密封胶，以消除接口处的电磁波辐射。其座舱采用金属镀膜处理，能够有效反射雷达波。

　　RCS越小，战机隐身能力越强

　　对于一款战机来说，RCS越大，证明隐身能力越差；RCS越小，表示隐身能力越好。对具备高隐身能力的五代战机来说，在投入使用之前对RCS进行准确测量就显得尤为必要。

　　我国沈飞飞机整机RCS测试项目近期就已经验证了飞机整机RCS测试环境，能够满足隐身飞机研制阶段和出厂验收阶段的工作需求，形成了内场、外场测试系统的配套布局，这将大大提高多种项目的研制能力。隐身装备设计复杂，表面工艺要求高。生产过程控制的各种离散性、服役使用和维护后装备表面出现的状态变化都可能对其隐身性能产生致命影响。而隐身测试评估是实现装备隐身性能不可缺少的重要环节，涉及从方案设计验证、研制方案筛选、部件和整机隐身效果评估到使用维护检定等全生命周期，可以较好地验证隐身性能的有效性，尽早发现可能存在的问题。

　　“唯有采用RCS测试这个‘试金石’，才能全面可靠的掌握战机等装备隐身能力，这对飞机的设计制造至关重要。这也是该团队备受各界关注的原因之一。”易芳说。

　　“因此，我国取得RCS技术突破，掌握隐身战斗机RCS测试的全套技术，具有里程碑意义。”易芳指出，“一方面，中国有能力依据自身的标准设计和制造战机、战舰和导弹等武器装备；另一方面，中国有能力对一些国家的隐身装备进行技术测量，破解其他国家战机、战舰、导弹等武器的隐身奥秘。未来将极大提高我国的综合作战水平，包括防空反导能力。”

　　隐身及反隐身机理间的博弈

　　美国、俄罗斯以及欧洲等军事强国为促进装备隐身技术发展，建立了强大的隐身技术研究与试验体系，全面支撑了隐身装备研制发展。同时建立了雷达目标散射特性测试场，用于飞行器隐身性能测试评估。

　　人们以往对已服役的隐身飞机的维修及性能评定缺乏便利、有效的检测手段。为此，美国空军专门在赖特·帕特森空军基地研制了通用低可观察性验证系统，通过对飞行器的RCS测试诊断成像，可以发现几英寸范围内的隐身缺陷。而这种方法，被用于隐身飞机维修质量的认证，而不必再进行飞行试验。

　　易芳介绍，目前仅美国、俄罗斯、中国等极少数军事强国掌握了这一顶尖技术，而其先进的战机都要经过RCS测试。21世纪初，美国洛克希德·马丁公司建立了F-22的RCS近场测试场。2008年，美国洛克希德·马丁公司投入使用专门的验收测试设备，负责验证F-35战机的隐身性能。未经改进的该设备每4天能测试1架F-35，改进之后缩短到1天测试1架，这也是F-35生产进入快车道的原因。

　　“隐身和反隐身技术是一种矛和盾的关系。这对矛和盾的关系，在于隐身机理和反隐身机理之间的博弈，不同的RCS技术测量机理对隐身性能测试有不同的效果。”易芳指出，“所以，RCS测试一方面就是利用自身技术改进战机隐身性能，另一方面就是要针对对方的RCS测量机理进行改进，当然对方的RCS测量机理一般也是密级很高的军事机密。”

关键字 : 雷达隐身技术测试


China’s new 20th Follower’s attention won the stealth test and left the radar no record
China’s new 20th Follower’s attention won the stealth test and left the radar no record
0

Net exposure 歼-20 new map attracts attention

Win the stealth test so that there is no "record" of radar

Our reporter Zhang Qiang

Recently, a picture of a 歼-20 placed on a tall stand attracted the attention of military enthusiasts. Some experts analyzed that the Radar Cross Sectional Area (RCS) of the R-20 was tested. At the same time, there is a news story that continues to ferment. According to an online media report, "China has publicly grasped a key core technology of stealth testing for fighter jets: RCS testing."

So, what exactly is an RCS test? What role does it play in the development of stealth fighters? Why is it called the core technology of fighter stealth testing?

RCS is an important indicator to measure fighter stealth performance

RCS is the most critical concept in radar stealth technology. It represents a kind of physical quantity of the echo intensity produced by the radar wave. In layman's terms, RCS is the area that the radar can see.

"After radar was applied to the military, the radar's scattering cross-sectional area became one of the most important and basic parameters." Yi Fang, a think-tank researcher, introduced the identification of intercontinental missiles in the 1950s and 1960s, since the 1980s. The stealth and anti-stealth technology needs of the aircraft led to two climaxes in RCS research. Since then, in view of the important value and significance of RCS, it has transitioned to the application of RCS technology for testing and testing to design and improve weaponry and improve stealth performance in response to radar reconnaissance, surveillance, tracking and target identification.

Yi Fang pointed out: "At present, the military power has adopted RCS as an important indicator to measure the stealth performance of warships, aircrafts, missiles, etc. Therefore, RCS technology is widely used in the design, research and manufacture of such equipment on the one hand, and the whole RCS test. Become the final procedure for the qualification of stealth equipment; on the other hand, through RCS technology fusion, to achieve the target motion pose recognition, target structure and size assessment, target category recognition, and distinguish the true and false goals, and even can also use RCS The measurement results are combined with the target image."

Under normal circumstances, the radar target material's electrical properties and microwave absorption properties, the geometric shape of the target, the direction of the target being irradiated by the radar wave, and the wavelength of the incident wave will all affect the RCS of the target. For example, the RCS of aircraft and missile heads is the smallest, while the RCS of both sides and tails is larger. For another example, the Tomahawk cruise missile has an RCS of less than 0.1 square meters, which is equivalent to only one bird.

A 2014 report pointed out that the designers of the Russian Sukhoi Design Bureau successfully reduced the radar reflection cross section of the T-50 Stealth Fighter (ie Su-57) to only 0.1 square meters. In order to effectively reduce the RCS of the T-50, the designer used a special body shape design scheme, a completely built-in weapon bay and a S-shaped air intake layout. In addition, its inlet surface is covered with a special material that can absorb radar waves. At the same time, the gap between the various components of the T-50 body is also filled with a conductive sealant to eliminate electromagnetic radiation at the interface. Its cockpit is coated with metal coating and can effectively reflect radar waves.

The smaller the RCS, the stronger the fighter stealth ability

For a fighter, the larger the RCS, the worse the stealth ability is proved; the smaller the RCS is, the better the stealth ability is. For five-generation fighters with high stealth capabilities, it is particularly necessary to accurately measure RCS before putting it into use.

The RCS test project of China's Shen-Fei aircraft has recently verified the aircraft's RCS test environment, which can meet the working requirements of the stealth aircraft development stage and the factory acceptance stage, and forms the supporting layout of the in-field and out-field testing systems. Improve the research and development capabilities of various projects. Stealth equipment is complex in design and requires high surface technology. Variations in production process control, service usage, and status changes that appear on the surface of equipment after maintenance can have a fatal effect on their stealth performance. Stealth test evaluation is an indispensable part of realizing the stealth performance of equipment. It involves effective verification of stealth performance from the entire life cycle of program design verification, development program screening, component and machine stealth effect assessment, and usage and maintenance verification. Sex, as soon as possible to find possible problems.

“Only by using RCS to test this ‘touchstone’ can we fully and reliably grasp the stealth capabilities of fighter and other equipment, which is crucial to the design and manufacture of the aircraft. This is one of the reasons why the team has received a lot of attention.” Yi Fang said.

“Therefore, our country has achieved breakthroughs in RCS technology and mastered the full set of technologies for stealth fighter RCS testing, which is a landmark.” Yi Fang pointed out, “On the one hand, China has the ability to design and manufacture weapons and equipment such as warplanes, warships, and missiles based on its own standards; On the other hand, China has the ability to conduct technical measurements on stealth equipment in some countries and crack the stealth mystery of other countries' fighter planes, warships, missiles, etc. In the future, it will greatly improve China's overall operational level, including air defense and anti-missile capabilities."

The game between stealth and anti-stealth mechanism

In order to promote stealth technology development of equipment, the United States, Russia, and Europe and other powerful military countries have established a powerful stealth technology research and testing system, which has fully supported the development of stealth equipment. At the same time, a radar target scattering characteristic test field was established to test and evaluate the stealth performance of the aircraft.

In the past, people had no convenient and effective detection methods for the maintenance and performance evaluation of invisible aircraft that had been in service. To this end, the U.S. Air Force has developed a general low-observability verification system at Wright Patterson AFB. Through the RCS test diagnostic imaging of aircraft, it can detect stealth defects within a few inches. This method is used for the certification of the quality of stealth aircraft maintenance without having to conduct flight tests.

Yi Fang introduced that at present only a handful of military powers such as the United States, Russia, and China have mastered this top technology, and its advanced fighter planes have to pass the RCS test. At the beginning of the 21st century, Lockheed Martin of the United States established the F-22 RCS near field test field. In 2008, Lockheed Martin Corporation of the United States put into use special acceptance testing equipment to verify the stealth performance of the F-35 fighter. The unimproved device can test one F-35 every 4 days, and then shorten it to 1 day to test one after improvement, which is why the F-35 production enters the fast lane.

"Stealth and anti-stealth technology is a spear and shield relationship. This relationship between spear and shield is based on the game between stealth mechanism and anti-stealth mechanism. Different RCS measurement mechanisms have different effects on stealth performance testing. Yi Fang pointed out, "So, one aspect of RCS testing is to use its own technology to improve the fighter's stealth performance. On the other hand, it is necessary to improve the RCS measurement mechanism of the other party. Of course, the RCS measurement mechanism of the other party is generally a very confidential military secret. ”
Keywords : radar stealth technology test

 

[Ang4MohTrump]

Shit! This is going to turn on Kim Jong Nuke by too much! Nuke Talks no use already.

 

[tun_dr_m]

Why we need 4th Gen Nuke? PLA explanation:

http://slide.mil.news.sina.com.cn/k/slide_8_62085_64176.html#p=1

一扫邪魔如掣电：中国为何至今仍需发展新一代核武器
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.01 21:05:13

• 

1 / 5
俄罗斯《独立报》网站5月29日转述中国工程物理研究院的报告称，2014年9月至2017年12月的三年时间里，中国共进行200次模拟核爆炸的实验室试验，相比之下美国在2012年至2017年的5年间仅进行了50次模拟实验。俄媒据此猜测，中国正在研发新一代核武器，并可能跟美军一样，将配备能够消灭特定目标的更小、更智能的战术核弹头。俄媒口中的这种新一代核武器是什么，中国又为何要研发，本期出鞘带您关注中国新一代核武器研究。（查看完整内容搜索微信公众号：sinamilnews）


一扫邪魔如掣电：中国为何至今仍需发展新一代核武器
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.01 21:05:13

• 

/ 5
自从1945年8月美国在日本广岛投下原子弹“小男孩”以来，核武器的发展已经历了四代。第一代核武器是原子弹，第二代核武器是氢弹，第三代则是将核爆效应“剪裁”后的核弹，比如中子弹、核钻地弹和核电磁脉冲弹等。目前第四代同时也是我们所说的“新一代”核武器虽然仍是氢弹，但不再完全以原子弹爆炸的能量来作为核聚变的反应条件。由于在核爆炸过程中几乎没有核裂变，新一代核武器不会产生剩余核辐射，同时也不受《全面禁止核试验条约》的限制（该条约中有个奇葩的规定，那就是“零当量”试验不算违约，即只要核反应释放的能量不大于试验所用的炸药能量就不算违约，所以核大国可以堂而皇之地进行各种亚临界试验）。同时由于没有临界质量的限制，新一代核武器还可以做得很小，甚至可以小到几吨TNT当量。新一代核武器的优势使得核大国可将其作为常规战术武器使用，因而受到各国追捧。


一扫邪魔如掣电：中国为何至今仍需发展新一代核武器
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.01 21:05:13

• 

目前在新一代核武器的发展上，美国可说是走在世界前列，中俄法等国则紧追其后。美俄法等国正在研究的新一代核武器有：1、美国哈佛大学研究的金属氢武器，它利用了金属氢爆炸威力相当于TNT炸药25~35倍的特点而研发（也因此可以作为未来火箭的超高能推进剂）；2、美国和法国研究的核同质异能素武器，核同质异能素可以通过重离子碰撞或惯性约束聚变生成，爆炸威力能够达到TNT炸药的几万倍；3、美国费米实验室和俄罗斯高能物理研究所研究的反物质武器，它利用正反物质湮没能释放出巨大能量的原理，可用作“干净氢弹”的扳机。美国1983年开始研制反物质武器，据解放军报称，2008年时美国军方发明了一种产生反物质的新方法，使得产生反物质的成本大大降低，从而向反物质武器的最终实用化又迈进了一步。


一扫邪魔如掣电：中国为何至今仍需发展新一代核武器
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2018.06.01 21:05:13

• 
• 中国在新一代核武器研制方面曝光的消息一直不多。去年1月世界顶尖学术杂志《科学》在刊文介绍中美第四代核武器的研究进展时，透露了中国新一代核武器研制上的一项最新成就。这项成就由南京理工大学的一个科研团队做出。《科学》杂志称他们在世界上首次成功合成了全氮阴离子盐，该物质的爆炸威力相当于TNT炸药的10~100倍，也有望被用于制造不依靠核裂变起爆的“干净氢弹”。而在反物质武器方面，据新华网报道称，2011年中科院上海应用物理研究所成功获得反氦4，2016年3月中科院上海光机所利用又超强超短激光，成功获得反物质——超快正电子源。但不知是否是保密等方面的原因，我们至今还未看到反物质投入实用的新闻。

Why we need 4th Gen Nuke? PLA explanation:

Http://slide.mil.news.sina.com.cn/k/slide_8_62085_64176.html#p=1

Demonstrating Demonstration: As for why China still needs to develop a new generation of nuclear weapons
Support key to flip picture list view

Full screen viewing
2018.06.01 21:05:13


1 / 5
The Russian "Ismail" website reported on May 29 that the China Academy of Engineering Physics reports that during the three years from September 2014 to December 2017, China conducted a total of 200 laboratory tests simulating nuclear explosions. Under the United States, only 50 simulations were conducted during the five years from 2012 to 2017. Russian media speculated accordingly that China is developing a new generation of nuclear weapons and may, like the US military, be equipped with smaller, more intelligent tactical nuclear warheads capable of eliminating specific targets. What is this new generation of nuclear weapons in the Russian media, and why does China have to research and develop? In this issue, she has taken you to pay attention to China's new generation of nuclear weapons research. (See the full content search WeChat public number: sinamilnews)


Demonstrating Demonstration: As for why China still needs to develop a new generation of nuclear weapons
Support key to flip picture list view

Full screen viewing
2018.06.01 21:05:13


/ 5
Since the United States dropped the atomic bomb “little boy” in Hiroshima, Japan in August 1945, the development of nuclear weapons has gone through four generations. The first generation of nuclear weapons was atomic bombs, the second generation of nuclear weapons were hydrogen bombs, and the third generation was nuclear bombs that "cut" nuclear explosion effects, such as neutron bombs, nuclear drills, and nuclear electromagnetic pulse bombs. At present, the fourth generation is also what we call the “new generation” of nuclear weapons. Although they are still hydrogen bombs, they no longer use the energy of an atomic bomb as the reaction condition for nuclear fusion. Since there is almost no nuclear fission during the nuclear explosion, the new generation of nuclear weapons will not generate surplus nuclear radiation, and it will not be subject to the "Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty" (the treaty has a wonderful policy that is "zero equivalent". The test is not a breach of contract, that is, as long as the energy released by the nuclear reaction is not greater than the explosive energy used in the test, it is not a breach of contract, so the nuclear powers can perform all kinds of subcritical tests in an open and solemn manner). At the same time, because there is no limit to critical mass, a new generation of nuclear weapons can also be made very small, even as small as several tons of TNT equivalents. The advantages of a new generation of nuclear weapons allow nuclear powers to use them as conventional tactical weapons, and are thus sought after by various countries.


Demonstrating Demonstration: As for why China still needs to develop a new generation of nuclear weapons
Support key to flip picture list view

Full screen viewing
2018.06.01 21:05:13

At present, in the development of a new generation of nuclear weapons, the United States can be said to be at the forefront of the world, and countries such as China, Russia and France are following closely. The new generation of nuclear weapons being studied by the United States, Russia, France, and other countries are: 1. Metal hydrogen weapons researched by the Harvard University. It exploits the fact that the explosive power of metal hydrogen is equivalent to 25 to 35 times that of TNT explosives (and therefore can be used as a rocket in the future). (2) U.S. and French research on nuclear isomeric weapons, nuclear homoplasms can be generated by heavy ion collisions or inertial confinement fusion, and the explosive power can reach tens of thousands of times that of TNT explosives; 3. The anti-matter weapons researched by Fermi Laboratories of the United States and the Russian Institute of High Energy Physics, which uses the principle that positive and negative materials cannot release large amounts of energy, can be used as a trigger for “clean hydrogen bombs”. The United States began developing anti-material weapons in 1983. According to the People's Liberation Army, in 2008, when the US military invented a new method of producing anti-matter, the cost of anti-matter production was greatly reduced, thus taking another step toward the ultimate practical application of anti-material weapons.


Demonstrating Demonstration: As for why China still needs to develop a new generation of nuclear weapons
Support key to flip picture list view

Full screen viewing
2018.06.01 21:05:13

China has not been exposed to the development of a new generation of nuclear weapons. In January of last year, the world’s top academic magazine “Science” disclosed the latest achievements in the development of China’s new generation of nuclear weapons when it introduced the research progress of the fourth generation of nuclear weapons between China and the United States. This achievement was made by a research team of Nanjing University of Science and Technology. "Science" magazine said that for the first time in the world they successfully synthesized a total nitrogen anion salt, the explosive power of this material is equivalent to 10 to 100 times that of TNT explosives, and is also expected to be used to manufacture "clean hydrogen bombs" that do not rely on nuclear fission initiation. On the aspect of anti-matter weapons, according to Xinhuanet.com, the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences successfully obtained a counterfeit in 2011. 4. In March 2016, the Shanghai Institute of Optics and Technology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences used a super-ultra-short laser to successfully obtain anti-matter - ultra-fast Positron source. But I do not know whether it is confidential or other reasons, we have not yet seen anti-substance into practical news.

 

[greedy and cunning]

Garbage in garbage out no matter how "super" a computer is.

The chinks can't program to save their lives. They need to hire some world class Ah Nehs to code for them.

glad that you are back to your normal self.
we were so worry that u could end up in a NZ mental asylum.