• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Parti Liyani case: some troubling matters

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
From the detailed judgement from Justice Chan, it is clear that this is not a case where the accused was acquitted because of some legal technicality but based on the merits of the defence’s argument.

While the public is focused on the false allegation of theft made by the Liew family, we have to also look at the troubling manner in how the investigation of the alleged offences and hearing of the charges were conducted.

Below are some of the troubling issues arising from since Dec 2016.

1. Police had issued an arrest warrant for Parti right after a police report was filed by Mr Liew. This is even before they got to verify whether the theft took place and confirm the items alleged to be stolen from the Liews.

It was only after the arrest of Parti on 2 Dec 2016 that the Investigating Officer (IO) paid the first visit to 49 Chancery Lane to take photos of the alleged stolen items. It is noted that not all the items were photographed.

2. After taking photos of the alleged stolen items, Police left the evidence with the Liews and recovered the items just a few days before the hearing in April 2018.

More:

https://www.onlinecitizenasia.com/2...chambers-dealt-with-the-case-of-parti-liyani/
 
Subhuman stinkie chinks can't compete. On their own turf.

Must now resort to bossing around some poor helpless Indon maid.

:roflmao:

Pathetic as it gets.

CECA virus is well deserved medicine for these chinks.
 
When a report is made, SPF look at the address of the complainant. From District 10, special treatment.
 
Tiagong the SPF report had to go through Ho Ching......
 
it's sad day for singapore to see elites bullying peasants
the 61% is the culprit
they voted for this state of affairs
 
That not even an official acknowledgement of the issues is indicative of the mess that
has surfaced. Sending more than 144 pictures of the alleged stolen goods and one
21-second video to the defence ON THE DAY OF THE FIRST DAY OF THE TRIAL does
not make good reading. And the pictures were in Black and White?
 
Thank you very much for sharing this golden nugget.

I think this serious matter even warrants live questioning in parliament. Both law and home affairs minister Shan and MOM minister Jo Teo need to account to the public.

One more thing...this LHL and HC's so called natural aristocracy at its most shitty morrally wrong worst.
 
When a report is made, SPF look at the address of the complainant. From District 10, special treatment.
The address is probably flagged as elite connected to Leegime.
Dun forget some beng legal debt collectors were previously charged for trying to collect a debt from same address. If a non connected peasant SPF wouldn’t have made the arrests.
 
Back
Top