• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Paramount Leader praise Holy Father for Peasantpore's Success

mscitw

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
2,973
Points
83
Seething with rage over persistent Ang Moh's perception that nepotism is prevalent in Peasatpore, the present Paramount Leader of Peasant asserted and reminded yanks that his father has build up Peasantpore by his own efforts.

In Mr Rose's interview, Paramount Leader Lee Junior shrugged aside the embarrassing financial losses incurred by his father and wife while managing GLC and Temasick's ill fated 'investments', or rather 'failed speculation'. In the financial world, failed speculations often become investments.

In a unnamed Nordic country, the team that presided over the soverign fund's losses was given the boot. In Peasantpore, what happened was most amusing. Another Ang Moh was invited to replace Paramount Leader's wife and only to quit and yield the seat back to Her Highness, this is the best evidence that meritocracy is number two compared to 'relationship', that Peasantpore, a pseudo western country has succumbed to the age old corrupt practice of 'guan xi' that is prevalent in yellow Asiatic cultures. This is the main reason no peasant has dared to question Paramount Leader's father over GIC's ill-fated speculation in Citibank. In corrupt yellow culture, posing embarrassing questions to the 'tai sui' aka 太岁 is paramount to seeking a premature doom.

While Paramount Leader is correct that his father may have played a significant role for Peasantpore, it is wrong of him to misappropriate all credit online and crow about his family's birthright to rule Peasantpore based on his father's contribution.
 
"Nepotism, Sir is a habit that grows. I am told it is like making love-it is always easier the second time! The first time there may be pangs of conscience, a sense of guilt. But once embarked on this course with constant repetition you get more and more brazen in the attack. All you have to do is to dissolve organizations and societies and banish and detain the key political workers in these societies. Then miraculously everything is tranquil on the surface. Then an intimidated press and the government-controlled radio together can regularly sing your praises, and slowly and steadily the people are made to forget the evil things that have already been done, or if these things are referred to again they’re conveniently distorted and distorted with impunity, because there will be no opposition to contradict.”
 
Back
Top