• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAPee Dogs Into Using "Clawback" Clause!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>$3k penalty for redeeming loan that came with $1k rebate
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I SOLD my three-year-old car early last month as I was going overseas at the end of the month. During the settlement of the outstanding loan with DBS Bank, I was quite surprised at the settlement amount which was higher than I expected.
Hence I asked for a statement which I received on Sept 18. I was shocked when I noticed a 'clawback charge' of more than $3,000, and called the bank on Sept22 to inquire about this.
I was told that this charge was due to early redemption, as I had taken a cash rebate of $1,000 with a tie-in period of three years. I replied that since I had bought the car in September 2006, and made the last instalment payment in August 2009, I should have fulfilled the three years.
However, the bank told me that although I had bought the car in September 2006, the loan began only in October and thus, I had fulfilled only 35 months and was one month short of three years.
I then asked if it was possible to waive the charge, and even offered to pay the penalty of one month of my instalment which amounted to $900. The bank said it had to check. And after my repeated calls, the bank finally replied on the evening of Sept 25 that it could not waive the charge as it was against its policy.
First, I am quite taken aback that the bank required four days to reject my request, if it was indeed a breach of policy. Also, I am shocked that a cash rebate of $1,000 can attract a charge of more than $3,000.
And even though I was just one month short of the period, and had offered to forfeit one month's instalment, the bank was inflexible. It does not befit the Best Asian Bank, and I will seriously reconsider before taking a loan from DBS again.
Gerald Lee
 

littlefish

Alfrescian
Loyal
I am sure DBS is very frightened of the "seriously reconsider" threat. Just like how Singaporeans have been "seriously reconsidering" the PAP all these years.
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
I told you these kind of hard-tactics will come .

Many Singaporeans having less money in the bank .
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I told you these kind of hard-tactics will come .

Many Singaporeans having less money in the bank .


To avoid problems Sporeans shouldn't be making deals with GLCs. Seems like they always have some unpleasant hidden clauses which they'll eventually use.

I don't know why people insist on using DBS, aren't there better banks out there :confused:

Just visit their branches & you'll see the long queues. DBS has a long history of giving people problems. If people insist on using them they shouldn't be surprised at the world class service :rolleyes:
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
I am sure DBS is very frightened of the "seriously reconsider" threat. Just like how Singaporeans have been "seriously reconsidering" the PAP all these years.
It will depend solely on who is doing the "seriously reconsidering".
Btw, I think Singaporeans should demand a "clawback" of overpaid salaries.
 
Top