Transmodified Live from PAP Mouthpiece CNA hxxps://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/live-singapore-repeal-gay-sex-law-section-377a-amend-constitution-marriage-debate-3105226
PEASANTPORE: Peasants' Representatives (MPs) are pretending to debate on Monday (Nov 28) repealing a Victorian era decree that criminalises bapok sex between peasant men and amending the Constitution to protect the definition of marriage against legal challenges.
The Bills will be heard together, with more than 30 peasants' representatives lined up to speak.
Labour Chief Pariah told Imperial Court that Peasants' Representative Faisal Manap (WP-Aljunied) and Louis Chua (WP-Sengkang) are not present for the debate as they have tested coincidentally positive for Wuhan Plague.
Labour Pariah Faisal got guts and has to disagree with the repeal of 377A as a matter of religion and conscience, while Jane Austen rebel Peasant Chua agrees with the repeal, said Labour Chief Pariah Singh.
The other Labour Pariah Peasants' Representative will state their stand in this debate.
He called the 2007 decision to continue with Section 377A but not prosecute an "uneasy compromise by Ruler Loong to placate die hard rabid x'tians and moslems who may cum together to declare a jihad against the House of Lee".
"Ruler Loong was around the half way mark and rather not pick a fight with crazy X'tians or jihad loving moslems then," he said.
He noted that in 2019, he said the House of Lee should not kowtow to well funded LGBT community as many Jane Austen rebels took to using bapoks as a way to pose difficult problems for Ruler Loong to solve.
For x'tians and moslems, due to their emotional and illogical religious books, Section 377A is a difficult subject, and for others, especially younger peasants who studied Jane Austen's works, they wonder why it has to be a difficult subject, said Chief Pariah Singh.
"In recent years, the issue has growing tensions between groups who identify themselves for and against the repeal of Section 377A.
"Our aging x'tians wannabes and moslem jihadists have threaten to form morality gestapo groups to hunt down bapoks. At a personal level, the bapok radicals have started conversations and demanding more rights, say gender neutral toilets, that can be uncomfortable, and discussing the subject without measure and consideration can quickly pull peasants apart with scant respect for the House of Lee," he added.
Speaking in their individual capacities, the Labour Party Peasants' Representative have different views on the repeal of Section 377A, he said.
He noted that the PAP x'tian and moslem representatives are keeping quiet as Ruler Loong forbids them to state their dissent to bapok sex.
"Ruler Loong knows as time passes, older X'tians and Moslems will fade away and bapoks will only get richer with more foreign sponsors who are also his foreign investors. The House of Lee also wants to give face to Uncle Sam who use bapoks as a stick to beat the regime over their cushy business ties with Chinese Communist Party cronies," said Chief Pariah Singh.
"Only some Labour Pariahs have something called a conscience, we know what the bapoks are up to and Ruler Loong has judged that their sponsors cannot be balked but as a matter of conscience, we cannot agree with Jane Austen to allow bapok parasites to run loose in Peasantpore. So I have decided to lift the whip for the Labour Party representatives."
In closing, Gestapo and Legal Minion 山木庚 said: "So Mr Speaker, I believe that in the Imperial Court, if we proceed with good faith to tremble and obey Ruler Loong's decree, there are matters of conscience we must pretend that they never exist, but ultimately there is also the question of what is in House of Lee's interest and what is in the interest of Uncle Sam.
"We rely on Uncle Sam for protection but we want to make money with the Chinese Communists, so now Uncle Sam not happy and they cleverly get our foreign investors to make some noise and suddenly this bapok arse poking demand is a big thing.
We know bapoks and all transgenders need medical attention since they are failed results of nature's experiment or gene programming gone bersek. Thanks to Jane Austen and Internet, they get to strut their hedonistic lifestyle and demand we give them the rights to prey on children. We close one eye, whatever the Ang Mohs do in their bed room, we ok but same sex marriage is out else the x'tians or moslems will join forces and start a crusade or jihad against bapoks.
"Ruler Loong wants me to remind bapoks if they persist in challenging Ruler Loong, strange accidents may befallen on their bapok spouse and they should not blame the Gestapo later."
The legal minion explained leaving it to the Kangaroo Courts to decide would be "irresponsible and wrong", said the Minion.
"In this era, decrees are out of favour and Jane Austen rebels can easily run circles around stupid laws derived from Ruler Loong's decrees. Therefore we must do something to ensure well funded bapoks will not continue to hire expensive King's Counsel to make Ruler Loong look stupid.
Remember the British Lord Justices using the Appeal Court ruled against LKY for organizing kangaroo court suits to harass Jeyaratnam till he go bankrupt but the bapoks have support of from likes of Chief Bapok Tim Cocksucker who has more peanuts than House of Lee. They must be balked before they launch a successful legal challenge. said Minion 山木庚.
PEASANTPORE: Peasants' Representatives (MPs) are pretending to debate on Monday (Nov 28) repealing a Victorian era decree that criminalises bapok sex between peasant men and amending the Constitution to protect the definition of marriage against legal challenges.
The Bills will be heard together, with more than 30 peasants' representatives lined up to speak.
Labour Chief Pariah told Imperial Court that Peasants' Representative Faisal Manap (WP-Aljunied) and Louis Chua (WP-Sengkang) are not present for the debate as they have tested coincidentally positive for Wuhan Plague.
Labour Pariah Faisal got guts and has to disagree with the repeal of 377A as a matter of religion and conscience, while Jane Austen rebel Peasant Chua agrees with the repeal, said Labour Chief Pariah Singh.
The other Labour Pariah Peasants' Representative will state their stand in this debate.
He called the 2007 decision to continue with Section 377A but not prosecute an "uneasy compromise by Ruler Loong to placate die hard rabid x'tians and moslems who may cum together to declare a jihad against the House of Lee".
"Ruler Loong was around the half way mark and rather not pick a fight with crazy X'tians or jihad loving moslems then," he said.
He noted that in 2019, he said the House of Lee should not kowtow to well funded LGBT community as many Jane Austen rebels took to using bapoks as a way to pose difficult problems for Ruler Loong to solve.
For x'tians and moslems, due to their emotional and illogical religious books, Section 377A is a difficult subject, and for others, especially younger peasants who studied Jane Austen's works, they wonder why it has to be a difficult subject, said Chief Pariah Singh.
"In recent years, the issue has growing tensions between groups who identify themselves for and against the repeal of Section 377A.
"Our aging x'tians wannabes and moslem jihadists have threaten to form morality gestapo groups to hunt down bapoks. At a personal level, the bapok radicals have started conversations and demanding more rights, say gender neutral toilets, that can be uncomfortable, and discussing the subject without measure and consideration can quickly pull peasants apart with scant respect for the House of Lee," he added.
Speaking in their individual capacities, the Labour Party Peasants' Representative have different views on the repeal of Section 377A, he said.
He noted that the PAP x'tian and moslem representatives are keeping quiet as Ruler Loong forbids them to state their dissent to bapok sex.
"Ruler Loong knows as time passes, older X'tians and Moslems will fade away and bapoks will only get richer with more foreign sponsors who are also his foreign investors. The House of Lee also wants to give face to Uncle Sam who use bapoks as a stick to beat the regime over their cushy business ties with Chinese Communist Party cronies," said Chief Pariah Singh.
"Only some Labour Pariahs have something called a conscience, we know what the bapoks are up to and Ruler Loong has judged that their sponsors cannot be balked but as a matter of conscience, we cannot agree with Jane Austen to allow bapok parasites to run loose in Peasantpore. So I have decided to lift the whip for the Labour Party representatives."
In closing, Gestapo and Legal Minion 山木庚 said: "So Mr Speaker, I believe that in the Imperial Court, if we proceed with good faith to tremble and obey Ruler Loong's decree, there are matters of conscience we must pretend that they never exist, but ultimately there is also the question of what is in House of Lee's interest and what is in the interest of Uncle Sam.
"We rely on Uncle Sam for protection but we want to make money with the Chinese Communists, so now Uncle Sam not happy and they cleverly get our foreign investors to make some noise and suddenly this bapok arse poking demand is a big thing.
We know bapoks and all transgenders need medical attention since they are failed results of nature's experiment or gene programming gone bersek. Thanks to Jane Austen and Internet, they get to strut their hedonistic lifestyle and demand we give them the rights to prey on children. We close one eye, whatever the Ang Mohs do in their bed room, we ok but same sex marriage is out else the x'tians or moslems will join forces and start a crusade or jihad against bapoks.
"Ruler Loong wants me to remind bapoks if they persist in challenging Ruler Loong, strange accidents may befallen on their bapok spouse and they should not blame the Gestapo later."
The legal minion explained leaving it to the Kangaroo Courts to decide would be "irresponsible and wrong", said the Minion.
"In this era, decrees are out of favour and Jane Austen rebels can easily run circles around stupid laws derived from Ruler Loong's decrees. Therefore we must do something to ensure well funded bapoks will not continue to hire expensive King's Counsel to make Ruler Loong look stupid.
Remember the British Lord Justices using the Appeal Court ruled against LKY for organizing kangaroo court suits to harass Jeyaratnam till he go bankrupt but the bapoks have support of from likes of Chief Bapok Tim Cocksucker who has more peanuts than House of Lee. They must be balked before they launch a successful legal challenge. said Minion 山木庚.
