• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP Spin: We are the best and let's not change anything

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
27,854
Points
113
5 lessons from past as S’pore plans for future: Heng

Robin Chan
The Straits Times
Friday, Aug 30, 2013

As the country plans for its future, it would do well to draw lessons from its past, Education Minister Heng Swee Keat said on Tuesday. And underpinning them all is the ability to turn adversity into opportunity.

He picked out five lessons on Tuesday while speaking at the launch of the Singapore Institute of International Affair's Future 50 (F50) programme.

Fresh from leading a year-long national conversation on what Singapore should be in 2030, Mr Heng offered up the problem of Singapore's water supply as an example of how it has turned a necessity into an advantage.

Not only does the country have its own desalination plant today, but its universities are also world leaders in water technology and membrane technology research, which have positioned it for other opportunities.

"This story about turning necessity into advantages should always be part of the Singaporean DNA. That things may be difficult, but it is the spirit that matters," he said.

Mr Heng delivered the keynote address while launching F50, a two-year exercise that will bring together scholars, policymakers and members of the public to discuss Singapore's place in the changing global context over the next 50 years. A report will be released ahead of Singapore's 50th National Day.

In his speech, he listed five important lessons from the past that he said those involved in F50 need to keep in mind.

The first is to understand Singapore's context as a city-state that is plugged into the world - "very different than if you are a city in a big country, or a country with many cities".

Next is the need to stay relevant to the world.

Third, Singaporeans should be open to ideas from all over the world, but also have the courage and conviction to do what is right for Singapore.

Fourth, Singapore needs good leaders who have the ability to take strategic decisions for the long term, "and not just think of it in quarterly terms or in terms of electoral cycles".

And finally, he said Singaporeans should retain their "can-do spirit" of resilience.

In the dialogue that followed, Mr Heng was asked what policies he thought the Government had got wrong. His response: What was more critical was the willingness to change the policy when it no longer fits the circumstances.

Citing the stop-at-two policy of the 1970s, he said: "Clearly if you look at the population policy - this is in the earlier phases where we had different sets of priorities and we had stop at two - I think over time, it has had a certain impact.

"But if you think about what has happened in Singapore over the last 48 years, if you take the overall record, it hasn't been a bad one... The important thing for us is policies are not good for all times. The ability to change when the situation changes is really the critical part."

[email protected]
 
Not only does the country have its own desalination plant today, but its universities are also world leaders in water technology and membrane technology research, which have positioned it for other opportunities.

Wah lau eh ...self proclamation again.

The first is to understand Singapore's context as a city-state that is plugged into the world - "very different than if you are a city in a big country, or a country with many cities".

Another variation of the old line that sinkapore is vulnerable so we must not be a democracy.
Let's put this back to the PAP ...if we are a city-state, so why the hell are you flooding the country with 8 million people!

Fourth, Singapore needs good leaders who have the ability to take strategic decisions for the long term, "and not just think of it in quarterly terms or in terms of electoral cycles".
That's how the business world operate ...in quarterly term. So, why is sinkapore inc different? In almost every way, sinkapore is run like a business.
Good leaders - we have used billions of taxpayers money to fund this scholar programme, assuming that we will create a pool of 'good' leaders. Well, the results prove otherwise. What we have created is a group of self-serving, greedy, entitled people who think that they are god's gift to sinkapore. They are bleeding the country to the tune of billions a year (assuming the group size to be 800 - 400 still working and half enjoying their pension).


In the dialogue that followed, Mr Heng was asked what policies he thought the Government had got wrong. His response: What was more critical was the willingness to change the policy when it no longer fits the circumstances.
Siam! No admission of having gone so wrong in its policies.



"But if you think about what has happened in Singapore over the last 48 years, if you take the overall record, it hasn't been a bad one... The important thing for us is policies are not good for all times. The ability to change when the situation changes is really the critical part."

And it has shown to be unwilling to change. It is time the people decide, not top-down governance. Let the people decide their own fate. So what if they screw up, it is the people who exercise that choice.
In every way, the PAP wants sinkee to be responsible for their own well-being. So, why not in governance as well? You can't have it both ways, PAP.
 
In the dialogue that followed, Mr Heng was asked what policies he thought the Government had got wrong. His response: What was more critical was the willingness to change the policy when it no longer fits the circumstances.

His avoidance of a simple direct question says it all. These guys are unable to field even a simple question and beat around the bush is indicative of the arrogance that these guys have.
 
"It's not a u-turn, it's a rethink."

They have certainly learnt well from their masters.
 
They are the best, their family members are the best, if you agree with them and follow their way, you are for them and you are the best, if you disagree with them and don't follow their way, you are against them and you are the worst, they will praise those who are for them, they will hound those who are against them.............

Goodness gracious shit. Haven't we realised this after all this time?
 
I think enough is enough from these MIW real change needs to prevail.
 
I think enough is enough from these MIW real change needs to prevail.

The PAp does not have to be good enough. They only need to be better than all the rest and they will stay where they are. Singaporeans need to understand what "good enough" means and clamor for that. Otherwise nothing changes.
 
The PAP pyramid is rotten at the top with smear of shit on sole of shoe LKY up there with Ah Loonie
The PAP pyramid is rotten all the way to the bottom as scums of society driven by self interest and greed are chosen by LKY from people as rotten as himself

The PAP pyramid is hold together only by the fear of LKY.
LKY will soon be going under the ghouls and demons all out to fuck and screw him with the mercy LKY is known for and which will return to him.

With LKY gone, and with BILLIONS at stake, and with the greediest and most vicious evil bastards in the PAP, how long will be be
before the hooting start?
Ah Loonie able to control that group of evil psychopaths?
Even his paper generals will be part of those hooting and hooting him

Ah Loonie need not fear for long as he will be destined to join LKY very soon

AND WE ALL HAVE OUR YUM SENGS AND SINGING AND DANCING ON TABLE TOPS AND STREETS
 
hi there


1. aiyoh!
2. what's new man?
3. machiam, selling old newspapers.
4. repeating the same old materials again and again.
5. this is just another one of those running dogs, oops! dafter sheep:kma:
6. following its grand masters' instructions.
 
Fuck him deep deep!

I can't find a parking lot in the shopping malls along Orchard Rd on a Saturday evening!

Fucking expressways with speed limit of 90 kph very often I've to drive at 40 kph.
 
It seems that every time these overpaid buggers open their mouths, someone in the audience or whatever will ask questions that really TEST them.. and then.. they show to all how USELESS they are.

And yet. 60+% still voted for these yahoos at the last GE.. #@#$$%^&!!!!

From students (Teo CB incident with the "what do u think"), to WP asking KBH in parliament.. .. and the list goes on.. why do we allow these overpaid bums to continue to be in the lineup???

I just read Today's article that some ballot boxes were found.. didn't say where.. didn't say what.. don't know if this news is BIG news.. or VERY BIG NEWS?!!!
 
Yes the PAP is the best and sticking to a tried, true and tested formula is the prudent thing to do.
 
Excellent speech and good for Singapore. PAP has delivered and will continuously deliver.
 
"But if you think about what has happened in Singapore over the last 48 years, if you take the overall record, it hasn't been a bad one... The important thing for us is policies are not good for all times. The ability to change when the situation changes is really the critical part."

yeah just like temasek, if you take the results over 5000 years, the ROI is not bad :D
 
His avoidance of a simple direct question says it all. These guys are unable to field even a simple question and beat around the bush is indicative of the arrogance that these guys have.

very old school politics - never admit to a mistake coz it makes you look weak... scourge of the old man.
 
Back
Top