Pap really out of touch

[hearthard]

The grassroots are not telling the hard truths to those in the high office.

PAP has been saying 'this cannot work' and 'that cannot work' for the future of Singapore. The new generation of voters are the ones that are saying 'you never try and how do you know?' Statements like 'cannot work' is an expression of insecurity. When the Govt spells doom for a change of political environment, it is afraid of losing control.

For the past 6 months, 8 out of 10 persons i spoke to will be voting for the Oppositions. The are just unhappy with HDB, LTA and ICA issues.

There is no need to be afraid, when the opposition forms the government, the whole cabinet changes but the civil service machinery continues to function as per normal. The new government just need to tweak the policies of HDB, LTA and ICA and everybody will be happy.

 

[Leongsam]

For the past 6 months, 8 out of 10 persons i spoke to will be voting for the Oppositions.

That's what everyone says when asked but when the ballot paper is before them, they'll dutifully vote for the PAP.

 

[red amoeba]

from day one...the manner is, we decide u follow. not happy, u can vote us out after 5 years....wa ha ha...

tats why also, DPM says, most of the new candidates are from public sector / NTUC ...very few from private sector. why? bcos private sector ppl fucked up? His reason is because they are happy doing what they are doing and not interested in politics...but my reasoning is that, they cannot take the top down decision making...working style.

 

[Leongsam]

they cannot take the top down decision making...working style.

There's nothing wrong with the top down management style. In fact, it's far more effective in the long run.

 

[The-Angel-1960]

That's what everyone says when asked but when the ballot paper is before them, they'll dutifully vote for the PAP.

Not always it happens. There WILL be an EXCEPTION case.

http://www.temasekreview.com/2011/04/11/why-opposition-mps-are-value-for-your-money/

 

[seebaysong]

There's nothing wrong with the top down management style. In fact, it's far more effective in the long run.

Top down mgt = top share spoils, bottom lick scrapes ... LOL !
Sporeans stupid dunno this concept, still so many flock to play MLM games

 

[GoldenDragon]

...but my reasoning is that, they cannot take the top down decision making...working style.

My hunch - they possess an independent mind. The last thing they aspire is to become a dog. Already so many millionaire dogs cho bo lan in Parliament liao.

 

[streetsmart73]

There's nothing wrong with the top down management style. In fact, it's far more effective in the long run.

hi there


1. no offence.
2. the top/down management also fails in the long run.
3. history repeats itself.

 

[Tunmasek]

That's what everyone says when asked but when the ballot paper is before them, they'll dutifully vote for the PAP.

Does that also show that there's a possibility that something is not straight behind the vote count? By right both sides should be allowed access to the results and count, but it seems only the PAP(who always wins) is allowed.

 

[Tunmasek]

That's what everyone says when asked but when the ballot paper is before them, they'll dutifully vote for the PAP.

Does that also show that there's a possibility that something is not straight behind the vote count? By right both sides should be allowed access to the results and count, but it seems only the PAP(who always wins) is allowed.