<TABLE id=msgUN border=0 cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD id=msgUNsubj vAlign=top>
Coffeeshop Chit Chat -
PAPee Thumbi: Peesai Not A Cuntry! </TD><TD id=msgunetc noWrap align=right>
Subscribe </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=msgtable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="96%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msg vAlign=top><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgbfr1 width="1%"> </TD><TD><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgF width="1%" noWrap align=right>From: </TD><TD class=msgFname width="68%" noWrap>
makapa <NOBR></NOBR> </TD><TD class=msgDate width="30%" noWrap align=right>8:40 am </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT height=20 width="1%" noWrap align=right>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname width="68%" noWrap>
ALL <NOBR></NOBR></TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right> (1 of 1) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft rowSpan=4 width="1%"> </TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>
23538.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt>
This Thumbi dog is testing Sporns' tolerance before declaring PAPee = Spore! FCUK THIS DOG HARD MAN!
Minister:"We are a city. We are not a country."
<HR style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #989898; COLOR: #989898" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->
LAW Minister K. Shanmugam spoke on Wednesday evening to participants attending the New York State Bar Association International Section's meeting in Singapore.
This was followed by a lively question and answer session on a wide range of issues, including politics and the political environment in Singapore, the law, the judiciary, and the press.
Quote:
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>“Even if Singaporean public opinion were unusually economically literate, it
would still be hard to explain the PAP’s dominance. In the Median Voter Model,
opposition parties’ best response would be to mimic the policies of the ruling
party, leaving voters indifferent. Singaporean politics plainly doesn’t work this
way; it seems to be in a political class of its own as long as we think of it primarily
as a country.
This is where most people make a mistake. … I have tried to explain that we are
different. We are a city. We are not a country. He is the first writer I have seen
who has said that.
“The picture changes radically if we instead think of Singapore as a city. In the
United States, big city politics is often about as lopsided as Singaporean politics.
Democratic mayors have won without interruption since 1931 in Chicago and
1964 in San Francisco. While the Democrats have failed to monopolise the
mayor’s office in New York City, they have near-PAP dominance of the New
York City Council: Democrats hold 45 out of 48 occupied seats.”
But nobody questions whether there is a democracy in New York.
Finally, in conclusion:
“In the West, Singapore is widely perceived as a benevolent dictatorship. From
this starting point, social scientists have little to learn from Singaporean political
economy. The explanation for Singapore’s success is simply that it had the good
fortune to be ruled by the smartest, nicest dictators on earth.
Once misconceptions about Singapore’s democratic credentials are corrected,
however, the city-state looks “curiouser and curiouser”; it seems to contradict
everything that experts think they know about democracy. How can any party
honestly win election after election – much less a party committed to many
economically efficient but unpopular policies? </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
