• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP in crisis (3): Lack of leaders in team of technocrats

temasekreview

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Singapore model of government which was characterized by a high degree of efficiency with minimal fuss was often referred to by admirers and detractors alike as “Singapore inc”.

The entire government is run along the lines of a major corporate company with the Prime Minister as the CEO and the ministers as directors of various departments. With literally no opposition to speak of, Parliament became a mere “board meeting” to rubber-stamp decisions already made by the party honchos.

Of course this definition of “Singapore inc” is pretty narrow as it includes the mammoth bureaucracy and various government-linked companies connected in an intricate network of mutual interests and relations.

After 50 years of uninterrupted rule, the PAP has become the de facto government in Singapore and as the boundary between party and state becomes increasingly blurred, the political aspect of governance is relegated to the backdrop as ministers are handpicked from outside the party and parachuted almost immediately into their respective positions in government.

Read rest of article here:

http://temasekreview.com/?p=12811
 
Top