• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

P N Balji : Orchid Evolution’ sweeping through S’pore'

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
‘Orchid Evolution’ sweeping through S’pore'
By Elena Torrijos | SingaporeScene – Fri, Apr 15, 2011 6:56 PM SGT

The "Jasmine Revolution" or turmoil that has toppled governments in the Middle East is not likely to take place in Singapore, but a major transformation is sweeping through society in the country, said a veteran local journalist and editor.

Speaking before an audience of about 80 executives at a seminar on corporate reputations on Friday morning, PN Balji, former CEO and editor-in-chief of TODAY newspaper, said this transformation, or what he termed as Singapore's "Orchid Evolution", is reflected by the new mood of the nation and other changes.

"I notice a certain restlessness, even restiveness, among different sections of the people," said the former editor with over 40 years of experience in journalism.

"Because the government has played a critical role, a womb-to-tomb role in people's lives, now there's a boomerang effect. They blame the government for everything that goes wrong in Singapore."

He said there have been "quite a lot" of blunders in the past few years such as the flooding of Orchard Road, the security lapse at the MRT station and the prison escape of Singapore Jemaah Islamiyah leader Mas Selamat Kastari.

Coverage of politics

Balji, who is currently director of the Asia Journalism Fellowship at the Nanyang Technological University, noted that the public's new attitude towards the government goes in tandem with the change in how the traditional media cover the opposition parties.

"It is like a breath of fresh air, the way the media is now reporting on opposition politicians and opposition politics," he said.

"There are two elements to this. One, the kind of prominence that opposition politicians and politics gets, and, second, the reports try very hard not to put them in a negative light, which as recent as 2006 was not true."

He believed that that this approach by the traditional media would not have gone ahead without some tacit acceptance by the government.

"Why do I think the government has tacitly agreed to this? I think the government doesn't want readership, circulation, viewership to drop," he said.

"If it drops the biggest loser is the government. They don't have any other platform which can reach that wide an audience."

He acknowledged that social media is available, but that it may not work for the PAP. He cited how Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong's attempt to make a joke on Facebook about PAP's new candidate, Tin Pei Ling, fell flat.

"The new media is putting a lot of pressure on the mainstream media. If for some reason the mainstream media is not seen to reflect a kind of public opinion, they are going to be punished, and punished very, very heavily," he said.

Other issues

Meanwhile, he noted that immigration has become one of the biggest issues in Singapore, despite the government making "concession after concession".

"I don't think a right-thinking Singaporean is against foreigners per se. I think they understand foreigners are needed," he said.

The question among people's minds is how come this government, if it is so good, cannot manage the problems of infrastructure -- whether the congestion of roads and MRT trains or the rocketting prices of housing -- that came as a result of it opening the immigration floodgates in 2005, he added.

Another change that he has observed has come over Singapore is the wild swings in economic growth. "One year you will go into recession, next year you will have 15 percent growth, the next year maybe 5 percent. How the people will adjust to that wild swing is another issue."

Furthermore, he believes the attitude towards older people has changed. He noted that the PAP has been stressing the point of having young people.

"The government keeps on harping on young people, but what is there to say you can't have a 65-year-old man or woman serving Parliament for five years?" he asked.

Yearning for change

Overall, however, based on his conversations with different types of people, Balji said that he gets a genuine feeling from people that they are not against the PAP government, but that they have a strong desire for more voices in Parliament.

"Look at the opposition, the young, talented, impressive people who are joining the opposition. That must indicate that there is less fear, and there is really a genuine desire to see some kind of change -- not the change of revolution, but a change in wanting more voices," he said.

He said he could not tell how this new groundswell of opinion would translate in the upcoming polls.

"Maybe this is just people letting out steam, and when it comes to the final analysis, they know which side their bread is buttered," he said.

Nevertheless, his gut feeling based on anecdotal evidence is: "One, I won't even be surprised that the PAP doesn't lose any seats. Two, that they might even take back Potong Pasir. Three, there will be a number of close fights, very close some of them. Fourth point, PAP's percentage of votes may go down even further. In good times, they manage 60 percent of the votes."
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Nevertheless, his gut feeling based on anecdotal evidence is: "One, I won't even be surprised that the PAP doesn't lose any seats. Two, that they might even take back Potong Pasir. Three, there will be a number of close fights, very close some of them. Fourth point, PAP's percentage of votes may go down even further. In good times, they manage 60 percent of the votes."

he knows very well sinkies are ballless.
 

fukyuman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Nowadays the only time I need ST newspapers is when my dog needs some newspapers to pee and shit on. Googlenews http://news.google.com/ is good enough. The situation now is ots like Libya and the insurgents. The whores of Bradell vs Temasek Review and Online Citizen on the other. Always make sure I send in my courtesy clicks to their websites. Google news is our friend and if everyone who supports Orchid Evolution do that, the Opposition voices will crush ST and Today Online in page rankings. ST has no credibility now. Its unsold newspapers are piled high and sold even on joss-sticks shops. An apt place to sell, maybe dearly departed Ah Ma needs to check the obituaries. In some private residential areas, ST is given away free.
What a reversal in fortune. in the past people would spend the whole morning reading, and by noon is is sold out in many areas and once I have to go to the airport to buy a copy.
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
ST has no credibility now. Its unsold newspapers are piled high and sold even on joss-sticks shops.

Funny thing is when I fly overseas (and back) for work lately it seems no passenger wants a copy of ST. With smartphones and tablets there are more alternatives readily available than the fucking States Times.
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It's true for me regarding the ST.
Last time I would keep the back copies whenever I go on holiday to read when I am back. And when was living overseas, would order the weekly overseas edition.
Now? I have not bought a copy for years as i cannot bear to stomach the propaganda written anymore.
Circulation is down? I would have expected the FTs to pick up the slack.
 

HTOLAS

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Years ago, the then Ministry of Culture (later Ministry of Community Development) published something called The Mirror which was a 'must read' for GP students and civil servants, of which I was one. Since it was free, and there were few alternatives, I was quite happy to read it. And while it was never anti-government or anti-PAPzi, it was actually quite balanced, especially when discussing overseas events.

Then, something very strange happened - they started charging for it. It was a small amount, but the principle of having to pay for what was essentially government propaganda stank. I asked a friend who was involved in the publication about and was told that the decision came from the very top, i.e. Great Leeder, and that very few in the MCD was in agreement but groupthink prevailed.

Many of us cancelled our subscriptions, and none of of supervisors bothered to advise us otherwise, in the way that we would have been advised not to cancel our CDAC or MENDAKI contributions. The Mirror died a natural death.

My purpose in relating this is to suggest that even back then, some 30 years ago, the PAPzis were out of touch with their constituents. They had even then over-estimated their ability to influence. I think they still believe their MSM still rule the day. Show them otherwise.
 
Top