• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Orchard condo saga: 3 days to leave

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking+News/Singapore/Story/STIStory_384715.html

3 days to leave
Landlord told a month ago to tear down partitions by June 3 as planning rules breached, but it kept mum
By Tan Weizhen

B5-1.jpg

A group of residents who had gathered at The Grangeford condo lobby on Sunday night to debate their options decided to call the police, who came and recorded their complaint. -- PHOTO: SAMUEL HE

TWO hundred tenants living in 140 apartments in a condominium off Orchard Road were caught off-guard after being told on Sunday night that they have to clear out by Wednesday.

Their landlord, Ideal Accommodation, had known for at least a month that the tenants - a mix of mostly young expatriate and local professionals and college students - would have to leave, but kept the news from them. As a result, many of the tenants are now livid.

Ideal, which had leased The Grangeford condo from Overseas United Enterprise (OUE), had converted 140 apartments into 600 self-contained rooms. It began sub-letting them this year.

Doing so, however, breached planning rules, and on April 29, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) told Ideal that it would have to tear down the partitions by June 3.

However, the company kept mum, and began telling tenants that they had to move out only last week. Even then, not all residents were told. Most found out only on Sunday, when they happened to walk past the property office, or got wind of it from their neighbours.

The affected residents - from places such as the United States, Hong Kong, South Korea, India and Vietnam - had signed tenancy agreements of between six months and a year.

The condo building was sold en-bloc to OUE in 2007. However, the company decided to sub-let the building, rather than redevelop the site, because of the deteriorating economic climate.

Ideal spent $3 million to divide up the apartments into smaller units, and rented each out for between $900 and $1,400.

The partitioned units each came equipped with a washing machine, LCD television set and Internet connection.

According to calculations by residents and property agents, dividing an apartment into several units this way can fetch rentals of up to $8,000, compared to about $4,600 if a flat is leased to just one tenant.

Read the full report in Tuesday's edition of the Straits Times.

[email protected]
 

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/433634/1/.html

URA extends deadline for The Grangeford to remove illegal partitions
By Valarie Tan, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 03 June 2009 2038 hrs

phpNd6OBq.jpg

Photos 1 of 1

Grangeford condominium




SINGAPORE: Tenants at a troubled condominium off Orchard Road, The Grangeford, are getting a reprieve.

The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) is extending the deadline for the condominium to remove illegal partitions and restore the apartments to their original state.

The property now has until July 27 to do so, instead of the original deadline which ended on Wednesday.

Building owner Cove Development has terminated the tenancy contract with Ideal Accommodation - the company which broke the law by sub-dividing the 141 units into 600 units.

Cove Development also said it plans to meet with current tenants in the next few days to explore possible options.

- CNA/yt
 

cowbehcowbu

Alfrescian
Loyal
so we have satin packed condos..factory for workers,,many HDB rented out with 6 to 8 per rooms..many shop houses with satin packed foreigners..all VIOLATING OUR URA PLANNING RULES AND FIRE SAFETY RULES..NEA RULES........

Is that the way to staff the 1.2 Million foreigners ?????????so that we can hire low waged foreiners???????

WHERE ARE WE HEADINGS?????????????
 
Top