In the past, they would just blurt out the truth and have to explain further. Or they may even tell a half truth and get entangled when they get found out. Now they just decline to reply politely. :p
2 little reports in the ST caught my interest.
In the first, Nicole was asked by reporters why she was more than an hour late for a gathering with her team-mates for a thank-the-people walkabout.
Her reply was that "it was an irrelevant news angle".
Huh? What in the world is that? But at the end of the day, she politely declined to reply and the reporters also lppl.
In the second report, CSM was asked by reporters who the young lady with him and his father at their polling centre was and whether he had voted in Bishan-TP before. CSM politely declined to reply. :o
My humble guess is a) the young lady was his daughter of voting age and he didn't want her to be in the media spotlight and b) he had not voted before being overseas and the ward was probably uncontested also.
2 little reports in the ST caught my interest.
In the first, Nicole was asked by reporters why she was more than an hour late for a gathering with her team-mates for a thank-the-people walkabout.
Her reply was that "it was an irrelevant news angle".
Huh? What in the world is that? But at the end of the day, she politely declined to reply and the reporters also lppl.
In the second report, CSM was asked by reporters who the young lady with him and his father at their polling centre was and whether he had voted in Bishan-TP before. CSM politely declined to reply. :o
My humble guess is a) the young lady was his daughter of voting age and he didn't want her to be in the media spotlight and b) he had not voted before being overseas and the ward was probably uncontested also.