• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Old Fart: Sporns Emigrate Cos PAPee is GOOD!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
http://mrwangsaysso.blogspot.com/2007/04/lee-kuan-yew-on-emigration.html

Apr 26, 2007
Lee Kuan Yew on Emigration
He said that while most Singaporeans could not leave, he is aware that the better-educated and talented ones could do so.

He noted that the top 20 to 30 per cent of educated Singaporeans have the skills and abilities to emigrate to anywhere in the world.

And many do, with about 150,000 Singaporeans working in companies, setting up businesses or living abroad.

'We are now into a globalised world where people who are well-educated, well-trained and especially English-educated have enormous options,' he said.

But his point to them was this: 'Can you leave with a clear conscience? I cannot.'

He urged them to think hard about what they owe the country. 'If we lose our top talent, then we will decline as a nation,' he said.

The key, he believed, was to inculcate a particular message in the young - especially those doing well in schools, colleges, polytechnics and universities.

'You are here, you are getting this education, you are getting these opportunities that make you mobile, that make you desirable because this mass of people had discipline, (were) hardworking, provided the stability, the base on which you mounted your career.

'Can you in good conscience say, 'Goodbye! Thank you very much'?'
Lee Kuan Yew is fond of telling stories. Most of them, however, are left incomplete.

There is one thing which by now you will notice about Lee Kuan Yew's version. Singaporeans always emigrate because the Singapore government has been too successful in doing good things.
In Lee's version, the world-class, top-talented, best-of-the-best PAP government has provided excellent education opportunities, political stability and a booming economy - Singaporeans have exploited all of those good things to develop their talent, and now they are leaving.

In the emigrating Singaporeans' own versions, you often hear different angles. They leave because they feared for their economic survival in this country. Because they suffered from its lack of freedoms. Because they were tired of living in a company, Singapore Inc.. These are aspects which Lee Kuan Yew won't tell you. Because these aspects do not reflect very well on the PAP government.

Far better for Lee Kuan Yew, if you simply believed his version - that the Singaporeans who emigrated, did so because they were ungrateful, irresponsible, lacking in conscience and uncaring about their less advantaged fellow citizens.


 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgbfr1 width="1%"></TD><TD><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgF width="1%" noWrap align=right>From: </TD><TD class=msgFname width="68%" noWrap>yooman <NOBR></NOBR> </TD><TD class=msgDate width="30%" noWrap align=right>Nov-13 2:26 pm </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT height=20 width="1%" noWrap align=right>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname width="68%" noWrap>CPL (kojakbt22) <NOBR> </NOBR></TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right> (20 of 41) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft rowSpan=4 width="1%"> </TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>24353.20 in reply to 24353.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt>Agree with this professor that the massive PR influx is wrong.
If anything else, it is misguided. This policy as it is can work if we follow the model in oil rich countries like Brunei, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the likes, - where all their citizens are provided for by the state. Of course they have the $$ for the model to work. It is misleading to assume this policy will work for a small country with limited land and resources just like the free market and social melting pot forces have done for NY, LA, SFX in America. These american metropolitan entities are just one of the many facets of American society and economic dynamics. They can draw resources from their vast surrounding areas like transport infrastructure, land and supporting industries. It is not rocket science that NY city on its own will not be prosperous - Manhattan don't even have enough capacity to house all people working there.
What is frightening is the underlying paternal and myopic attitude taken by govt in this parochial pursuit of economic growth - eg "I cannot stop people from bringing in people" "cheaper, better and faster". It is driven to the extent that its own people is treated like pure inventory -> ageing people = absolete stock that new replacement to ensure growth. There is total disregard on the social impact especially for the lower 50-60% of the population.
2 possible trajectory outcome - the majority of us becoming the underclass or even menial slaves in our own land; or a land-shaking revolt at the election boxes.
Just take some quiet time to reflect on what you and sgp will be in 5-10yrs time with this policy. With each minister earning multiples of $m each year, we should expect solution that is more encompassing of all aspects of sporean life. We should not be afraid to impose the same market principle ie to vote them out if they are not delivering. They take CEO pay, they should be magnanimous to 'walk' for their failure to deliver to the people the same way non-performing CEOs are sacked by shareholders. This should be make the key issue for the next election, not those pork barrel upgrading projects or one-time bonus.
</TD></TR><TR><TD> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msgleft width="1%"> </TD><TD class=msgopt width="24%" noWrap> Options</TD><TD class=msgrde width="50%" noWrap align=middle> Reply</TD><TD class=wintiny width="25%" noWrap align=right> </TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgbfrbot> </TD><TD colSpan=3> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Top