• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Old Fart Defends His Betrayal of Sg Workers to Foreigners!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>What an old jerk! His traitor's habits die hard!

Why the ILO changed its mind
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><TR>

S'pore has proven that its tripartite approach to labour ties works: MM
</TR><!-- Author --><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By Goh Chin Lian
</TD></TR><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->THE International Labour Organisation (ILO) used to say Singapore was taking the wrong tack with how its unions operated. It has now changed its view.
It even encourages trade unions from developing countries to learn about Singapore's tripartite approach to industrial relations, Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew said last night.
He was speaking to participants of the Singapore Human Capital Summit, where he was asked by Mr Md Mosleh Uddin, Secretary of Bangladesh's Ministry of Establishment, for advice on dealing with unions.
Responding, Mr Lee said ILO representatives used to tell Singapore that the way the unions were run was wrong.
'You must have unions that confront employers, hard bargaining, then out of that comes maximum benefits for the employee,' he recalled.
Having started out in his career as a lawyer representing unions in negotiations, Mr Lee said he understood what unions wanted.

=> More like he has conned them into voting him into power and then turned around to sell them out like a 2-headed snake.

When Singapore left Malaysia in 1965 and was bereft of a hinterland, it faced two options.
It could continue with a climate of strikes, sit-ins and riots carried out by the mainly communist-controlled unions, and perish.
Or it could, as it did, seek to survive by making itself useful to the developed countries of the world.
This was done through several measures: restoring to employers their right to hire and fire; using a secret ballot to decide whether to go on strike; having disputes which involved essential services settled by arbitration; and ensuring fair arbitration.
'So over the years, we had unions working together with the Government and working in negotiations with employers in a tripartite fashion called the National Wages Council,' he said.

=> That's fake unions that are no more than an offshoot of the Papayas?

The council makes yearly recommendations after reviewing the economy's performance.
But Singapore's approach is not easy to duplicate, said Mr Lee.
'It was a stroke of destiny that created this condition, and if we do not keep this sense of equity, it will be lost.'
It means that employers have to not only give unions a fair deal but also ensure that they make sufficient returns for their business and shareholders.
The Government's role is to 'give everybody a fair bite' through good housing, education and health services.

=> At overpriced levels?

'They are heavily subsidised,

=> True only if u're an FTrash on free scholarship!

so you can be a taxi driver's son or a hawker's son, you will not be denied healthy living conditions,' he said.
'How you perform is up to you - your motivation, your willingness to put in the effort to learn, to acquire knowledge and skills and to be useful to the economy. And that's how we began.'

=> That is u're a digit!

Mr Lee noted that a United Nations Habitat report yesterday cited Singapore as being the only city in the world not to have slums. He said this was also the result of a deliberate effort from the outset. 'If we have slums, we will have a lot of dispossessed people who get alienated and finally become rebellious.'

=> Aren't more and more people sleeping on the streets and the poor living in filth confined within the 4 walls of their pigeonholes?
 
Top