![](https://www.jihadwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Saqib-Iqbal-Shaami-300x174.png)
The notorious Islamic hate preacher Saqib Iqbal Shaami, who is based in Birmingham, England, is the “founder of Kanz ul Huda international, world renowned Islamic research scholar & spiritual guide.” If you take a look at Saqib’s Facebook, you will see that he is a popular commentator. He deceives his audience and international media by claiming that Mohammed gave women rights. This is a clear and divisive attempt to subvert the knowledge of the “kuffar” in order to implement Sharia as a supposedly merciful system, which it is not. Saqib claims Mohammed is a women’s rights advocate because the prophet of Islam stated that ‘’Heaven is under the mother’s feet’’. This was the only point Saqib brought up and probably the only one he could muster. He continually diverts the topic to the alleged sins of others, asking what about the Romans? They were bad, while claiming that Mohammed came and gave women rights. Saqib literally only brought that one point to claim that Mohammed gave women rights, while he knows full well that Mohammed’s teaching oppresses women. Saqib is deceiving his audience, a popular Jihadi tactic.
A lady who came to Mohammed and stated she had committed adultery; he ordered that she be stoned. Not really a women’s rights advocate, is he, Saqib? Saqib also believes in these totalitarian practices. A woman came to Aisha and her face was green because her husband had beaten her brutally. Aisha stated to Mohammed that this woman was suffering. Mohammed didn’t care and stated: “Another person should never ask a man why he beat his wife”. Mohammed also commanded in Surah 4:34 of the Koran that men should beat women from whom they “fear disobedience.” This quote is clear that even if the man only “fears” disobedience but there is no actual disobedience, he can still beat his wife. This demonstrates clearly that Mohammed was anti-women and was not interested in giving them rights. He stated that women must be covered up and not show certain parts of their body; his wives wore the burqa, so Muslim women are forced to emulate this, and their husbands make them wear it even in the heat. The burqa also poses a security risk, makes women unemployable, and is anti-women. Mohammed stated that “women are deficient in intelligence” and that their testimony was worth half that of a man. Furthermore, Mohammed also stated hell will be mostly full of women. The Koran says that Muslim men can rape their female captives, women and girls (4:24). The list could go on. Mohammed was the most anti-women false prophet there was. Saqib knows this full well, but wants to lie and deceive in order to manipulate others into thinking Mohammed was a women’s rights advocate.
In Saqib’s sermons, he encourages sectarianism, and expresses hatred for Muslims who don’t celebrate Mohammed’s birthday. He also makes the false claim that it’s only the Wahabis that are bad. This is another subversion of the truth, as Sunni, Shia and numerous other sects create terrorists. Their actions can be traced to the teachings and actions of Mohammed, the allegedly infallible man, who beheaded the disbelievers. Saqib also screams loudly about “hypocritical” Muslims not loving Mohammed. Through his lies and deception, he radicalises young Muslims to not only hate other sects, but also to hate non-Muslims who would insult Mohammed. They need to do something to show their “love”, which is clearly violence.
I caught one of Saqib’s videos where he is praising Mohammed for killing the kaafir in the battle of Badr. In that battle, Mohammed beheaded the Quraysh and threw their heads into a well while screaming “Allahu akbar”. He said their kids would go to hell. He hated the Quraysh for not believing in him, and he behaved the same way with whomever he encountered. He also raided their caravan. Saqib Iqbal glorifies this type of behavior, yet Facebook take no action, but is focused on “Islamophobia”. This extremist hate preacher should be barred from the UK, and those who highlight the proliferating Jihadist threat should be allowed in, but the UK government is afraid to be politically incorrect.