• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

No property tax hike with procedural representation

mscitw

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
2,973
Points
83
Many stupid local peasants did not realized that they are not flat owners, but merely tenants or leasers with limited rights. This is the fundamental reason why Housing Mafia could evict peasants citing killer litter or banks are unwilling to accept public pigeonholes for loan guarantees. The sham that the regime promotes as 'home ownership' is a facade.

Hence, when No Porn Lui suggest property hike as a measure against future hikes should property prices increase, he proved to be a serpent in paradise who speaks with a forked tongue despite his holier than thou stance against bapoks.

Suppose property prices decline if the West reacts badly to the money printing plan, is No Porn Lui repealing his silly hikes? He probably laugh his way to the bank after his Master gave him a raise for a quick way to fleece stupid peasants. Since peasants are occupiers of the pigeonholes with no ownership rights, is property tax a fair way to drain them of a few dollars to fund Madam Ho's next overseas adventure?

No Porn Lui is therefore a contender for the 2009 Vermin of the Last Quarter.
 
Back
Top