• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Nine out of ten students proud to be S'porean

Pica_NA

Alfrescian
Loyal
Tue, Sep 15, 2009
AsiaOne




The Ministry of Education (MOE) survey in 2008 showed that students had a sense of belonging to Singapore, with 9 out of 10 students being proud to be Singaporean.

Minister for Education Dr Ng Eng Hen gave this response in a written parliamentary reply to MP Dr Fatimah Lateef's query on whether Nation Education (NE) objectives have been met so far, and if there are KPIs (Key performances indexes) pertaining to this.

Below is the Minister's reply in full:


Dr Ng Eng Hen:

When National Education (NE) in schools was launched in 1997, the stated objectives were to develop national cohesion, cultivate the instinct for survival and instil confidence in our future. These goals continue to be relevant but following the 2007 Report of the Committee on National Education, MOE has placed a greater emphasis on these goals, in addition to fostering a sense of belonging to Singapore.

Programs and outcomes related to NE are reviewed annually in all schools as part of the School Excellence Model where schools systematically assess enablers and processes in relation to key performance results linked to the Desired Outcomes of Education. Schools with consistently good NE programs and outcomes are recognised in the yearly NE Awards. In the last 9 years, there were 144 such schools which effectively infused NE into the school's formal and informal curriculum. In addition, these schools engaged key stakeholders and built sustained partnerships with community partners in relation to NE.

For example, Evergreen Secondary School has a program to teach students storytelling skills, leveraging on diverse media tools to convey the Singapore Story. The school also has a comprehensive emergency preparedness programme organised in conjunction with the local community.

To ensure that students have basic knowledge about Singapore, an NE quiz is administered for Primary 6 and Secondary 4 students. MOE also surveys student perceptions and attitudes to obtain feedback on the effectiveness of our NE programs. Our latest survey in 2008 showed that students had a sense of belonging to Singapore, with 9 out of 10 students being proud to be Singaporean.

82% of students said they were comfortable with friends from a different religious background. They also expressed increasing confidence in Singapore's future. 74% of students expressed the belief that Singapore will remain prosperous over the next five years, and that we will remain a leading economic centre in Asia.

While these survey results are encouraging, MOE will continue to review its NE programs and content periodically to ensure that they engage students and serve our overall objectives. MOE is also mindful that we will have to engage other stakeholders, including parents and the community on this collective task to instil among our students a sense of rootedness to Singapore.
 

TeeKee

Alfrescian
Loyal
how come articles like this always comes from 144th? do u know i am more proud to be a russian? ve have great anthems like this...power man....

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qLcc19mt4eA&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qLcc19mt4eA&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
sure, until they hit the workplace and see that FT are taking their jobs. let me if they feel happy then.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Interview with kids who haven't even reached maturity...

What a disgrace...

Don't worry. The pride doesn't last very long....


**********************

Of migration and the Singaporean diaspora

changi_airport.jpg

Alvinrocksus


By Kelvin Teo

Published: April 14, 2009



Print StoryEmail Story
Share (Facebook)Post comment

SINGAPORE – A survey conducted by the Singapore Polytechnic revealed one sobering statistic – more than 50% of youths aged between 15 and 29 years old want to migrate overseas if given the chance. Another ironic piece of statistic is that despite going through National Education in their schools, 37% admitted that they are not patriotic. Another interesting number is that despite 60% of the youth not being interested in local politics, half of them want to see more opposition in parliament.

And this migration statistic is worrying our leaders. Senior Minister (SM) Goh Chok Tong admitted in a meeting with Iranian leaders that Singapore is leaking talents, especially the top notch ones. And this leakage of talents extended to the civil service as well. This was ironic considering the fact that SM Goh fired a rhetorical salvo in challenging Singaporeans’ resolve to stay to fight for the nation instead of taking flight at the first sign of trouble, ending with a famous question – “are you a quitter or a stayer?”

Admittedly, this rhetorical question triggered an emotional response. The quitter reference didn’t go down well amongst a number of Singaporeans, especially those who have migrated or have already considered migrating. A variety of reasons were offered to explain their unhappiness. Be that as it may, sometimes it would be interesting to dwell on the causes behind Singaporeans’ decision to migrate rather than the furore over the stayer-quitter remarks.

Mr Seah Chiang Nee, in an article published in the Sunday Star, attributed one of the causes to a self-centred generation with no personal bond to the nation. Half of it is figured by Mr Seah. The other half is possibly attributable to the fact that Singaporeans are rarely offered a part to play in the running of the nation. Singapore has always been run in a top-down approach, the catch phrase for that is a paternalistic form of governance. Basically, Singaporeans have not much say in the running of Singapore.

Thus, there is a need to engage Singaporeans in the sense that they should be given a say in the direction that Singapore should take, and in doing so, shoulder more responsibilities. When citizens are given more responsibilities in running the country within a decentralized system of governance, the national bond naturally comes. In fact, this engagement should be extended to Singaporeans who have left our shores.

The case study of India has taught us that despite the brain drain, the Indian diaspora worldwide has benefitted India in terms of cash injection and technology transfer. It would be tragic if the Singapore government fails to engage the Singaporean diaspora worldwide.

One solution to the brain drain in SM Goh’s words is “to turn to talented people from other countries, get them to work here and eventually turn them into Singaporeans”. That in itself is a gamble because not all foreigners would end up taking up Singapore citizenship.

However, the pertinent question is – has the government completely forgotten the former sons of Singapore? It appeared that SM Goh’s reference to them as “quitters” will only further alienate them. One really wonders if it has ever occurred to the Singapore government that the Singapore diaspora worldwide can still be considered a valuable resource in terms of knowledge and finance. Even SM Goh conceded that these talented former Singaporeans are “harvested straightaway by top companies and institutions”. Thus, wouldn’t a friendly engagement allow Singapore to tap on their expertise or benefit from their cash injection? Alienation would only burn the bridges for eternity.

When there was talk about building up a knowledge-based economy, the government rolled out the red carpet in welcoming foreign luminaries. Perhaps, the same red carpet should also be rolled out to welcome overseas-based Singaporean or ex-Singaporean experts too.

Prime Minister Mr Lee Hsien Loong envisioned Singapore as “an inclusive society where no one will be left behind”. It is a beautiful vision worth attaining. However, former Singaporeans should also be included in this vision. Even as they have left our shores, they are still a part of us nonetheless. Instead of burning bridges, more bridges should be built to reach out to such Singaporeans.
 

angie

Alfrescian
Loyal

Of course! Doncha all know that Shitty Times published only the "good news"? Anything damaging to PAPee will be conveniently ignored or censored. :rolleyes:



.
 

Pica_NA

Alfrescian
Loyal
They always forget one important point.... kid love to talk when they are sleeping.......
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Our PAP despot government can stay to run the administration of Foriegn Talent and military contingent. Since they want to boss everything .
 

Wang Ye

Alfrescian
Loyal
Must be a very well crafted survey.

If given a choice of being proud and don't really care, I believe the actual outcome would be more enlightening.
 

takcheksian

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don't be mistaken about this being good news.

The MOE conducted the interviews.

Would a kid in our regimented education system dare face a fierce interviewer and tell her that Singapore sucks?


I took part in a survey about my school when I was in school. It was supposed to be confidential. My answer was not to the administration's liking, so I kenna fxxx by form teacher later.


Of course! Doncha all know that Shitty Times published only the "good news"? Anything damaging to PAPee will be conveniently ignored or censored. :rolleyes:



.
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Interview with kids who haven't even reached maturity...

What a disgrace...

If one could recall, the ministers were only willing to debate with children for one period of time despite repeated calls by CSJ and co. for open debate. Now they donch even bother to debate with kids anymore!
 
Top