• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Nigerian Speak of Parliament Fucks Chinese Ambassador

from ghana.
1586836668180.png
 
Ambassadors are always the first to be verbally fucked whenever two countries have disputes.

Take note, all you grunts working at the MFA. :wink:
 
No wonder US want this country to be poor peasants, never learn to 说话不要太过分 得罪了人家不好...
 
Ambassadors are always the first to be verbally fucked whenever two countries have disputes.

Take note, all you grunts working at the MFA. :wink:

OBOR CCP lend so much money to the members now CCP spread virus all these loans no need to pay back to CCP liao. Africa huat ahhhhhh.
 
Scientific American
Subscribe
Close
Search
  • SHARE
  • LATEST



THE SCIENCES
Y Chromosome Study Suggests Asians, Too, Came from Africa


If youve been following the debate over modern human origins lately, you might feel as though you're watching an academic boxing match. One week the Out of Africa modelthe leading view, which proposes a recent African origin for our speciesdelivers a punch; the next week the Multiregionalism theorywhich holds that humans arose in Africa around two million years ago, spread throughout the Old World and evolved as a single speciesreturns the blow. Earlier this year, Multiregionalism gained some ground, but a study published today in the journal Science seems to offer strong new support to the Out of Africa scenario.
When it comes to genetic evidence in particular, Out of Africa has claimed the lion's share of support. But many of the studies have focused on so-called mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), prompting critics to counter that the results reflect the history of the genes contained in that small piece of DNA, not the history of the population from which the DNA was taken. The new findings, however, come from an analysis of characteristic DNA sequences, known as markers, on the Y chromosome.
Geneticist Li Jin of the University of Texas and his colleagues examined Y chromosomal DNA from more than 12,000 males belonging to 163 populations in Asia and Oceania. Multiregionalism posits that archaic humans such as Neandertals contributed to the modern human gene pool. Thus modern Southeast Asian populations, for example, should retain some ancient lineages inherited from the archaic populations that once inhabited that regionan argument that the multiregionalists have bolstered with fossil evidence. But Jin and his colleagues only found markers associated with a gene mutation known to have arisen in an African ancestor sometime between 35,000 and 89,000 years ago. This, the authors write, "indicates that modern humans of African origin completely replaced earlier populations in East Asia."

ADVERTISEMENT
With support coming from both mitochondrial and Y-chromosomal DNA, the Out of Africa case might seem a lot stronger. But other genes may one day tell different tales. "You can nail it down from the perspective of the Y and mtDNA," University of Arizona geneticist Michael Hammer told Science, "but that still leaves us at the doorstop of the nuclear genome."
 
Back
Top