• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

New TraceTogether Token design.....

Johnrambo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 10, 2017
Messages
4,084
Points
113
https://tinyurI.com/yyr9pqa2

9Mpnorb.jpg
 
one of the smallest tokens by far
 
Can't switch off this physical token.
:biggrin: :biggrin:
Forever monitoring you

BdmuYxJ.jpg


oaIIOUQ.jpg
 
Last edited:
Looks like the PAP technocrats have chosen to ignore #3. :wink:


https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=5820


Back in early April, Sean ‘xobs’ Cross and I were contacted by the European Commission’s NGI program via NLnet to propose a privacy-protecting contact tracing hardware token. The resulting proposal is called “Simmel”. While not perfect, the salient privacy features of Simmel include:
  1. Strong isolation of user data. By disallowing sensor fusion with the smartphone, there is zero risk of GPS or other geolocation data being leaked. It is also much harder to do metadata-based attacks against user privacy.
  2. Citizens are firmly in control. Users are the physical keeper of their contact data; no third-party servers are involved, until they volunteer their data to an authority by surrendering the physical token. This means in an extreme case, a user has the option of physically destroying their token to erase their history.
  3. Citizens can temporarily opt-out. By simply twisting the cap of the token, users can power the token down at any time, thus creating a gap in their trace data (note: this feature is not present on the first prototypes).
  4. Randomized broadcast data. This is a protocol-level feature which we recommend to defeat the ability for third parties (perhaps an advertising agency or a hostile government) from piggy backing on the protocol to aggregate user locations for commercial or strategic benefit.
 
Looks like this. Will Empress Dowager approve?

1628068001985.png
 
How about this design that is meant to put inside the cheebye ?

external-content.duckduckgo.jpg
 
Back
Top