• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

New GPS tracking to replace current ERP. Motorists to be hit in the pocket again.

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[h=2]New GPS tracking to replace current ERP[/h]
PostDateIcon.png
October 13th, 2012 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Contributions

A new GPS system of charging self-drive commuters adds pressure to switch to public transport. Motorists to be hit in the pocket again.

As one of the world’s most expensive countries for car-owners, Singapore has started to test a new satellite-tracking technology to tax vehicles on congested roads.

The government plans to use the Global Positioning System (GPS) to track cars on congested roads and highways and charge them levies. If necessary, this may replace the current annual road tax.

Satellite tracking will replace the current Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) system that uses some 80 electronic gantries located at various busy expressways and in the city centre.

The GPS trial began in May on a stretch of Woodlands Avenue 12 not far from the Causeway, said the Today newspaper, quoting the Land Transport Authority (LTA).

The replacement of road gantries would happen in the space of 18 months, it added.

When operational, the new technology can change the travel habits of nearly a million motorists in the republic as well as visiting Malaysian drivers.

This new form of charging motorists may make it even more expensive to use a car in Singapore. For the state Treasury, it will be a more effective source of revenue.

It will be a step closer to the day when operating a car in space-challenged Singapore will be out of reach of the middle class.

The new system’s other capabilities include better traffic control like catching speeding vehicles and those which beat red lights, spotting illegal parking or tracking hit-and-run drivers.

It can help find stolen cars, assist police in solving certain types of crimes, and aid in tracking offenders.

The Straits Times, however, warned: “Singaporeans will have to watch not only their back, but high in the sky whenever they think of committing a traffic offence.”

The authorities can also – if they want to – use it to keep track of the movements of political foes.

“Big Brother will be watching you!” exclaimed one blogger.

A web surfer said it would really bring things to a whole new level: “In future your car would be watched every hour of the day, seven days a week. And that’s just plain creepy.”

A transport official mentioned no launch date, but said these are still early days. It could be a few years before all problems are ironed out and the system becomes fully operational.

He said: “(The trial area) Woodlands Avenue 12 is a suitable site as it is a relatively straight road with high traffic volumes, and a good mix of different vehicle types.”

The way our population is expanding, there is little prospect of the motorist avoiding the move away from the car to public transport, however crowded it may be.

It does not augur well for the aged, the sick and the handicapped. Official projections see the population reaching 6.5 million, but land space will remain the same.

A plethora of taxes, some uniquely designed in Singapore to reduce the car population and private car usage, has succeeded well in two areas – cutting traffic jams and lightening the burden on Singaporean pockets.

There are few countries where buying and operating a car is more expensive than in Singapore. Any elected government that tries the same measures will be out the door in the next election.

As a result, Singapore has only 12 cars per 100 people, half of Hong Kong’s 24.

The taxes imposed on private cars in Singapore are so devilishly complex that it would take a whole chapter to list them and explain how they work.

The purchasing costs include these mind-boggling factors: registration fee, cost price, road tax, COE (certificate of entitlement), additional registration fee and Customs duty.

Understandably, many Singaporean buyers do not fully understand them; they simply pay – and grumble.

Increasingly, young professionals are emigrating to countries where cars are a lot cheaper.

Here, a medium-sized 1,600cc Japanese car costs around S$120,000 (RM300,031), enough to buy a bungalow in many Asian countries. This is twice the price 18 months ago following a surge in COE prices.

How the government intends to operate the GPS system is anyone’s guess. But it will have more options than the current gantry technology.

For example, it may impose a road levy charging the motorist according to mileage covered, the time of usage or the location – or any combination of the three.

If it replaces the flat annual road tax, it could mean that the charge meter could start running the moment the owner drives his car out of his house.
“Under satellite tracking every time he drives to the corner coffee shop for a toast-and-egg breakfast, he pays for using the road,” a veteran taxi driver explained.

An advantage is that he may no longer pay an annual road tax, which could benefit infrequent motorists.

In time, the GPS method of charging may become even more unpopular than the current electronic gantry system.

Some people believe it would be implemented either long before or after 2016, the next general election.

The whole thing is part of the government’s strategy to get Singaporeans out of their cars and into public transport.

City planners want 70% of peak-hour trips by Singaporeans to be on trains and buses eventually.

The way to do it is to hit commuters in the pocket.

Years ago, an enthusiast who ran a special car blog estimated that a Singaporean must earn S$7,650 (RM19,125) a month to be able to buy and operate a car without financial stress.

At that time, the average family income was S$7,000 (RM17,500) a month.

That led to his conclusion that “a car has become a luxury item in Singapore”.
.
Seah Chiang Nee
Chiang Nee has been a journalist for 40 years. He is a true-blooded Singaporean, born, bred and says that he hopes to die in Singapore. He worked as a Reuters corespondent between 1960-70, based in Singapore but with various assignments in Southeast Asia, including a total of about 40 months in (then South) Vietnam between 1966-1970. In 1970, he left to work for Singapore Herald, first as Malaysia Bureau Chief and later as News Editor before it was forced to close after a run-in with the Singapore Government. He then left Singapore to work for The Asian, the world’s first regional weekly newspaper, based in Bangkok to cover Thailand and Indochina for two years between 1972-73. Other jobs: News Editor of Hong Kong Standard (1973-74), Foreign Editor of Straits Times with reporting assignments to Asia, Europe, Africa, the Middle East and The United States (1974-82) and Editor of Singapore Monitor (1982-85). Since 1986, he has been a columnist for the Malaysia’s The Star newspaper. Article first appeared in his blog, http://www.littlespeck.com.
 
Don't see a problem the vast majority of the population doesn't need a car. Better for them to do more and clear the streets so we have smooth traffic on bus and cabs. The system is there to tax the rich, the desperate and the stupid
 
Last edited:
The issue isn't just about money. THEY'LL KNOW EXACTLY WHERE YOU ARE AND WHERE YOU HAVE BEEN !!!!

No more telling porkies. You'll get nailed.
 
This is ridiculous. If public transport is efficient and comfortable, you won't have to force your citizens to use it. This gov is trying to force people to use it's inefficient, overpriced, packed like sardine public transport and make more money out of it to pay themselves with big bonuses!
 
The issue isn't just about money. THEY'LL KNOW EXACTLY WHERE YOU ARE AND WHERE YOU HAVE BEEN !!!!

No more telling porkies. You'll get nailed.

Exactly. No more trips to Geylang, Joo Chiat Road, HCs, KTVs, Hotel 81, & Fragrance Hotel. All a wive, GF, or P.I. needs to do is contact LTA to find out exactly where the hubby or BF was at a particular time on a particular day.
 
Exactly. No more trips to Geylang, Joo Chiat Road, HCs, KTVs, Hotel 81, & Fragrance Hotel. All a wive, GF, or P.I. needs to do is contact LTA to find out exactly where the hubby or BF was at a particular time on a particular day.

If you want to remain anonymous on those trips then you'll have to use public transport :D
 
Freedom is a western concept. Asians neither need nor care for such frivolity. :D
 
The issue isn't just about money. THEY'LL KNOW EXACTLY WHERE YOU ARE AND WHERE YOU HAVE BEEN !!!!

No more telling porkies. You'll get nailed.

The wifey will know....but this GPS thing is nothing new. They have tested this for years, installing boxes along Raffles Place, recording data of cars illegally parking along the Tow Away Zones & so forth.

Have said this before...soon you start your vehicle, the tracking starts, they do not need the car park gantries anymore, one will be charged per kilometer one drives, on certain stretch of road, pay premium prices. Parking on zigzag lines, any lines, anywhere that is not designated for parking etc..auto summons.

So..'big bruther' watching you..everywhere you go, where you come from...." ha ha ha ha ha
 
Last edited:
will affect kup kias anot?
 
Last edited:
this is nothing new. it's being planned in the bay area...

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/20...ould-be-tracked-by-gps-taxed-per-mile-driven/

OAKLAND (KCBS) – Bay Area drivers could one day be tracked using a GPS-like device in their cars and taxed per miles driven – a scenario which is part of a proposed long-range study aimed at finding ways to reduce traffic and pollution, while also raising revenues.

Members of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments are scheduled to vote on Thursday on whether or not to authorize a study of the proposal. Under the plan, drivers would have to install trackers in their vehicle and officials would tax drivers for every mile they travel.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/lud...tall-gps-devices-that-could-tax-their-travel/

On Thursday evening, a controversial study in the San Francisco Bay Area will be voted upon that could require drivers to allow GPS devices to be installed inside their car. The ultimate goal? Not to see where they’re going, but to evaluate how much they’re driving — and consider taxing them for it.

http://www.mercurynews.com/peninsula/ci_21095536/bay-area-drivers-could-pay-drive-each-mile

Imagine being taxed a dollar for driving to the store. Commute to work? That'll be a few bucks more. Is it crazy or the way of the future? The Bay Area is considering a long-range plan to become the first place in the nation to tax drivers for every mile they travel, with an average bill of up to $1,300 per year.

The proposal is a long way from becoming reality. But under the scenario, drivers would likely have to install GPS-like trackers on their cars to tally travel in the nine-county Bay Area, from freeways to neighborhood streets, with only low-income people exempted.
 
Exactly. No more trips to Geylang, Joo Chiat Road, HCs, KTVs, Hotel 81, & Fragrance Hotel. All a wive, GF, or P.I. needs to do is contact LTA to find out exactly where the hubby or BF was at a particular time on a particular day.

And these data will be used to screw opposition candidates just before election.
 
And these data will be used to screw opposition candidates just before election.

they have to conduct their hanky panky business in an underground parking or multi-storey garage to hide from gps satellites.
 
I like this system..it will be an integral part of the NewWorld Order.
 
This is ridiculous. If public transport is efficient and comfortable, you won't have to force your citizens to use it. This gov is trying to force people to use it's inefficient, overpriced, packed like sardine public transport and make more money out of it to pay themselves with big bonuses!

Raymond Lim got screwed for thinking sg transportation is world like he wud like it to be........... & to make it so, he screwed hard all motorists. Lost his job n the rest is HISstory.......
 
Exactly. No more trips to Geylang, Joo Chiat Road, HCs, KTVs, Hotel 81, & Fragrance Hotel. All a wive, GF, or P.I. needs to do is contact LTA to find out exactly where the hubby or BF was at a particular time on a particular day.

It's Bye Bye to steaL eats anymore, whether it's the hubby or wifey..which dont bodes weLL for either party.:cool:
 
hard to prove that a couple is bonking in the garage unless they can track the humping in the car, which gps cannot do.

Attach the GPS relay station with a motion sensor that detect a certain programmed velocity related to 'humping in the car" coupled with a long directional microphone to detect sounds of a certain decibel range that is generated when having orgasm, & heat sensor to detect body heat, can? what do you think?
 
Last edited:
, In HK their gahmen want to follow SG ERP. honkies protested no freedom, their gahmen
relented ERP removed. Can Sinkies protest on GPS system? no Sinkies only knows how
to KPKB boh lam par.

Than Papaya gahmen just shaft into your throat like it or not! swallow it!
L.L. next erection still vote for them! Never learn their lesson!
 
Back
Top