• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

New EZ-Link Card A Eat $ Exercise!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Waive charges for ez-link top-ups
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I AM disappointed with EZ-Link's new service charges for users of its new Cepas-compliant cards.
In addition to a one-time application fee of $1.50, users of its Cepas-compliant cards will now be charged a convenience fee of 25 cents on each Giro top-up.
Furthermore, application is now a manual process that takes 21 working days to process and requires the completion of a paper form.
On older non-Cepas-compliant cards, we used to be able to sign up for Giro through the ticketing machines at no extra cost and enjoyed top-ups at no charge.
Would EZ-Link please consider waiving application charges and fees on Giro top-ups on a permanent basis?
Announcement of the Giro auto top-up facility cannot be branded as a new convenience feature and made chargeable when it has been available to the public for years.
In fact, its customers have been inconvenienced in many other ways by the transition to the new cards when it was removed as a mode of payment at many locations.
The company should be aware that its customers are technology-agnostic of the way its cards work; we should not be made to pay more for a failure to design an open payment application (Cepas) in the first place.
Users could have held on to existing ez-link cards if there was no call for a mandatory mass replacement.
�
Tan Shao Yi
 
Top