Muslim shopkeeper roughs up, verbally abuses Muslim woman for wearing jeans instead of burqa

[duluxe]

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/othe...an-for-wearing-jeans-and-not-burqa/ar-AAQaNbT

A shopkeeper in Assam allegedly hurled verbal abuses at a 22-year-old woman and also manhandled her for wearing jeans instead of a burqa. The man allegedly told her that she should be wearing “decent” clothes as she was a Muslim. Police have detained the man and his son, who allegedly beat up the woman’s father for questioning the shop owner for abusing his daughter.

The incident took place on October 25, when the woman went to buy headphones in Assam’s Biswanath Charali. The accused, identified as Nurul Amin, runs an electronic accessories shop in Biswanath and kept a stock of items stored at his residence as well.

According to police, the woman went to buy a pair of headphones from him at his residence, where Amin verbally abused and manhandled her for wearing jeans and not a burqa. He told her that she should be wearing “decent” clothes as she a Muslim, police added.

Police said the woman went home in tears and related the incident to her father. Infuriated, her father questioned Amin about his conduct towards his daughter, police added.

Later, however, Amin’s son Rafikul beat up the woman’s father in public for questioning his father, police said.

Following this, the woman’s family lodged a complaint at Biswanath Charali police station. An FIR was registered on the basis of the complaint, under IPC sections pertaining to punishment for wrongful restraint, obscene acts and voluntarily causing hurt…..

 

[JohnTan]

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/othe...an-for-wearing-jeans-and-not-burqa/ar-AAQaNbT

A shopkeeper in Assam allegedly hurled verbal abuses at a 22-year-old woman and also manhandled her for wearing jeans instead of a burqa. The man allegedly told her that she should be wearing “decent” clothes as she was a Muslim. Police have detained the man and his son, who allegedly beat up the woman’s father for questioning the shop owner for abusing his daughter.

The incident took place on October 25, when the woman went to buy headphones in Assam’s Biswanath Charali. The accused, identified as Nurul Amin, runs an electronic accessories shop in Biswanath and kept a stock of items stored at his residence as well.

According to police, the woman went to buy a pair of headphones from him at his residence, where Amin verbally abused and manhandled her for wearing jeans and not a burqa. He told her that she should be wearing “decent” clothes as she a Muslim, police added.

Police said the woman went home in tears and related the incident to her father. Infuriated, her father questioned Amin about his conduct towards his daughter, police added.

Later, however, Amin’s son Rafikul beat up the woman’s father in public for questioning his father, police said.

Following this, the woman’s family lodged a complaint at Biswanath Charali police station. An FIR was registered on the basis of the complaint, under IPC sections pertaining to punishment for wrongful restraint, obscene acts and voluntarily causing hurt…..

Harassing women for not wearing burqa is encouraged under the fake mohamedan religion. The irony is that the founder of the mohammedan religion was described as a pedophile and a rapist in his own scriptures.

 

[laksaboy]

The further north in India you go, the nearer to Pakistan and Bangladesh, the worse it gets.

 

[Loofydralb]

Harassing women for not wearing burqa is encouraged under the fake mohamedan religion. The irony is that the founder of the mohammedan religion was described as a pedophile and a rapist in his own scriptures.

No different from christians burning heretics at the stake and forcing everyone to comply to their demands.
Sounds a lot like the TALIBANS.

 

[syed putra]

A Burke is more comfortable to wear than tight fitting jeans which may cause blood clots.

 

[kulgai]

No different from christians burning heretics at the stake and forcing everyone to comply to their demands.
Sounds a lot like the TALIBANS.

I don't think it sounds like anything close. Christians have already moved on from that dark period in time since centuries ago but muslims are still in their dark period at this very moment. That's how backward they are.

 

[JohnTan]

No different from christians burning heretics at the stake and forcing everyone to comply to their demands.
Sounds a lot like the TALIBANS.

What the fuck are you talking about? Don't mohammedans like you support the taliban?

 

[Loofydralb]

What the fuck are you talking about? Don't mohammedans like you support the taliban?

Your simple minds paints everything with the same brush. That's why you are polytheistic with 3 gods.

I don't think it sounds like anything close. Christians have already moved on from that dark period in time since centuries ago but muslims are still in their dark period at this very moment. That's how backward they are.

Another simple mind here. Christians have moved on to mass killing using latest technology and weapons, while their PR worked overtime on marketing the killings as ideological instead of religious wars.

 

[kulgai]

Your simple minds paints everything with the same brush. That's why you are polytheistic with 3 gods.

Another simple mind here. Christians have moved on to mass killing using latest technology and weapons, while their PR worked overtime on marketing the killings as ideological instead of religious wars.

Sorry to say your argument or analogy or whatever you call it is obviously flawed. I know no amount of reasoning can change your mindset. This is the very reason many muslims can't keep up with the times and make progress.

 

[Loofydralb]

Sorry to say your argument or analogy or whatever you call it is obviously flawed. I know no amount of reasoning can change your mindset. This is the very reason many muslims can't keep up with the times and make progress.

Trying to kid yourself?
Trying to impose your habits, traditions and values on others either by persuasion, coercion or force is exactly TALIBAN behaviour.
The image in the mirror is ugly now right?

 

[duluxe]

US, most european countries and sinkieland, state and religion are seperated. WWW 1 & 2 nothing to do with religion.

 

[JohnTan]

Your simple minds paints everything with the same brush. That's why you are polytheistic with 3 gods.

You are against the taliban? Pigs will fly!

Another simple mind here. Christians have moved on to mass killing using latest technology and weapons, while their PR worked overtime on marketing the killings as ideological instead of religious wars.

Every important islamic figure, such as mahomet, his close companions, were rapists, bandits and killers. And no, Biblical people are not islamic people. Kindly stop stealing other religion's prophets for your own.

 

[rodent2005]

No different from christians burning heretics at the stake and forcing everyone to comply to their demands.
Sounds a lot like the TALIBANS.

The "christians" did it, so it's ok. Anyway, these people who burned people are Roman Catholics who were closer to muslims than real Christians.

 

[Loofydralb]

You are against the taliban? Pigs will fly!



Every important islamic figure, such as mahomet, his close companions, were rapists, bandits and killers. And no, Biblical people are not islamic people. Kindly stop stealing other religion's prophets for your own.

You'd be surprised at the majority of Muslims around the world who disagrees with the Taliban and their methods.
Muslims guidance is the Quran and hadiths which the Taliban selectively choose.

All those prophets are Muslims because they submit to one creator, unlike you polytheist and idolators. No wonder your book paints your own prophets as rapist and lechers.

 

[Loofydralb]

I

The "christians" did it, so it's ok. Anyway, these people who burned people are Roman Catholics who were closer to muslims than real Christians.

I did not say it's ok.
Those burning people are not only Catholics. Others do too. Like KKK

 

[JohnTan]

You'd be surprised at the majority of Muslims around the world who disagrees with the Taliban and their methods.

LOL! When the taliban took over, very very much fewer attacks carried out by moslems against schools and market places. During the war, when I talk with moslems online or in real life, most supported the taliban against NATO and the Afghan government.

Muslims guidance is the Quran and hadiths which the Taliban selectively choose.

Nope. The taliban actually follow the moslem quran and hadith very very closely. It is actually cockroaches like you who selectively chose your hadiths to avoid admitting that your sole prophet is some pedophile and bandit. The taliban were merely mimicking mahomet's hit-and-run tactics and banditry, child raping and wife beatings. They are also killing moslems who leave islam because they follow hadiths of mahomet and his men killing people for leaving islam or criticizing him.

All those prophets are Muslims because they submit to one creator, unlike you polytheist and idolators. No wonder your book paints your own prophets as rapist and lechers.

You have no idea what a prophet is. So any person mentioned in the quran is hereby a prophet. You are the idolator and polytheist. You worship a man called mahomet while claiming to be worshipping an arabian god. You are the idolator because it is you who bow before a silly stone whenever you pray.

My Book is the very source of your book. Some arab scribes, along with child rapist and bandit called mahomet, took pages from my Book and edited it for their own personal narrative. The means the quran is a corrupted version of the Bible.

 

[Loofydralb]

LOL! When the taliban took over, very very much fewer attacks carried out by moslems against schools and market places. During the war, when I talk with moslems online or in real life, most supported the taliban against NATO and the Afghan government.

Does that not prove my point that many muslims are not adhering or understand their own religion eg the Taliban. These people are in agreement with the taliban due to politics, not religion.

Nope. The taliban actually follow the moslem quran and hadith very very closely. It is actually cockroaches like you who selectively chose your hadiths to avoid admitting that your sole prophet is some pedophile and bandit. The taliban were merely mimicking mahomet's hit-and-run tactics and banditry, child raping and wife beatings. They are also killing moslems who leave islam because they follow hadiths of mahomet and his men killing people for leaving islam or criticizing him.

Hit and run against their polytheistic occupiers from the west is justifiable. They are after all fighting for their land. There is no more hit and run under Taliban now.

You have no idea what a prophet is. So any person mentioned in the quran is hereby a prophet. You are the idolator and polytheist. You worship a man called mahomet while claiming to be worshipping an arabian god. You are the idolator because it is you who bow before a silly stone whenever you pray.

My Book is the very source of your book. Some arab scribes, along with child rapist and bandit called mahomet, took pages from my Book and edited it for their own personal narrative. The means the quran is a corrupted version of the Bible.

If anyone wants to find out they can read the Quran for themselves and prove you're a liar.

Muslims don't worship Muhammad. It is you who worship Jesus, who eats , shit, sleeps, get tired, etc , just as a normal human does, as god!
Do you see pictures of Muhammad anywhere? No! But I see plenty of Jesus images in the church.
Do you see statues and idols in a mosque? No! But I see all sorts of idols in the church.
Do muslims worship a stone? No! Even if the stone is moved elsewhere, we muslims will still pray in the direction of mecca, even if there is nothing there.

You book contains copious errors, mistakes, contradictions etc. If the Quran was copied from your book, surely all the errors, mistakes, contradictions, etc would still be there! Miraculously, they're gone!

Now go kiss your idols you polytheist!

 

[Loofydralb]

The "christians" did it, so it's ok. Anyway, these people who burned people are Roman Catholics who were closer to muslims than real Christians.

You missed my point totally. I never mentioned it was OK. I mentioned that the behaviour of trying to make others do what you want them to do is no different from the TALIBAN. Is that difficult to understand?

Also, please bear in mind the 'real' christians are using the bible originally derived from the Roman Catholics. Catholics can claim to own the earlier bible which 'real' christians then copied.

Shameless ain't it to label yourself as 'real' when you use fake, copied, imitation products?

 

[JohnTan]

Does that not prove my point that many muslims are not adhering or understand their own religion eg the Taliban. These people are in agreement with the taliban due to politics, not religion.

The moslems of afghanistan and pakistan are known for their strict adherence to their moslem religion, as taught by the two moslem scriptures. The jiuhu political party that you follow, PAS, is trying to do the same in kelantan and spreading it all over jiuhu.

If the afghan version of the mohammedan religion isn't correct, then which version is correct? Is it the PAP version of islam? Many of us grassroots leaders, including myself, played a direct role in shaping islam to be more compatible with our multicultural society here.

Hit and run against their polytheistic occupiers from the west is justifiable. They are after all fighting for their land. There is no more hit and run under Taliban now.

You need to understand that the occupiers are the moslems themselves. islam only appeared from the 600 AD period onwards, and went on to occupy lands that belong to others.

Like I said, you support the taliban. You support their hit and run tactics, which is copied from mahomet's banditry days, and the targets were mostly soft targets like schools, market places and even mosques.

There is much fewer hit and run tactics now simply because the terrorists were the taliban themselves.

If anyone wants to find out they can read the Quran for themselves and prove you're a liar.

People should read the Bible and compare to the quran. I strongly encourage that. They can see for themselves that the quran copied stories from the Torah and outright corrupted them. A good example is Abraham sacrificing Issac to God. The moslem arabian scriptures swapped out Issac and replaced him with Ishamel. That's already a corruption of the Bible and Torah by arab scribes.

Also, please bear in mind the 'real' christians are using the bible originally derived from the Roman Catholics. Catholics can claim to own the earlier bible which 'real' christians then copied.

Bear in mind that the moslems have been using a corrupted version of the Bible for centuries. It's called the quran. Your moslem scribes copied Biblical text and edited them to suit the arab narrative. And your corrupted version, aka quran, is so incomplete that you needed a persian called Al Pocari to come along centuries later to write the book 'The adventures of mahomet', aka hadith, as a supplementary scriptures to fill in the gaps of the quran.

Shameless ain't it to label yourself as 'real' when you use fake, copied, imitation products?

Shameless is a label for moslems. You copied the Bible, came up with a corrupted version of it called 'quran' and then called 'quran' an original?? If this sort of copying happened for a modern commercial product, you would have been sued long ago.