• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Moslem MILF Jailed For Stealing From Mosque! Guess Race!!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
36,768
Points
113
SINGAPORE - A corporate service officer of Darul Aman mosque entrusted to collect monies for items such as public donations and payments for religious classes ended up misappropriating nearly $38,000 at the place of worship.

Marlina Abdul Rahman committed the offence from March 2017 until July last year.

The 36-year-old former mosque employee pleaded guilty on Wednesday (Jan 8) to one count of criminal breach of trust involving nearly $15,000 and was sentenced to nine months' jail.

Two other similar charges related to the remaining amount were considered during sentencing.

She has made partial restitution of $4,800.

Marlina, who worked for the mosque in Jalan Eunos from January 2017 until August last year, committed the offence just two months after she started her employment there.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Suhas Malhotra said that she used her ill-gotten gains to pay for items such as her family expenses.

Her criminal acts came to light some time last August after the mosque's corporate and estate manager, Ms Farlida Mohamed, discovered a shortage of $4,800 from the cash it collected around the Hari Raya Haji period.

She conducted a check and found 219 manual receipts issued by Marlina.


The DPP told District Judge Luke Tan that manual receipts are meant only as a backup if the mosque's accounting system is down.

He added: "(Ms Farlida) made a thorough check and discovered that 155 out of the 219 manual receipts were not registered in the accounting system.

"In addition, nine out of 64 manual receipts that were registered with the accounting system, were logged with a lower amount in the system."

The mosque, in consultation with the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (Muis), lodged a police report on Oct 23 last year.

Muis said in a statement that it takes a serious view of any financial impropriety at its mosques, adding that there are policies and procedures in place to ensure good governance in them.

"Muis continuously reviews these measures to meet national regulatory standards and benchmarks. These policies and procedures are necessary to uphold the community’s trust of our religious institutions."

Muis has conducted refresher training on the Mosque Financial Regulations (MFR) for mosque staff and members of the management boards over the past few years as well as regular independent audits on all mosques to ensure compliance with the rules.

Marlina, who was unrepresented, wept as she stood in the dock.

She pleaded for leniency and told the court that she had recently found out that she was pregnant.

For criminal breach of trust, she could have been jailed for up to 15 years and fined.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...osque-employee-who-misappropriated-nearly-38k
 
Non-Chinese only steal or scam maximum 5 or 6 digits.

Chinese scam millions.
 
Non-Chinese only steal or scam maximum 5 or 6 digits.

Chinese scam millions.
hanor, in before someone comes to say that iq and race has a part in who dares big, oso wins big!
here comes johnny….. :rolleyes:
 
Obviously you are a dickhead like leongsam. As if you never heard of rosnah and najid, marcos and suharto.
 
Allah has said in the Quran about forgiveness towards fellow beings, no matter how much they have hurt you"… They should rather pardon and overlook. Would you not love Allah to forgive you? Allah is Ever-Forgiving, Most Merciful." (Qur'an, 24:22)
 
Beside the jailtime .does she have to cough out the money she took and return?
 
Last edited:
Allah has said in the Quran about forgiveness towards fellow beings, no matter how much they have hurt you"… They should rather pardon and overlook. Would you not love Allah to forgive you? Allah is Ever-Forgiving, Most Merciful." (Qur'an, 24:22)


Quran, Sharia law , also require hand of thief to be chopped off!

1578496157600.png



1578496288900.png


How many times did she steal?

And what about maggots maggotess in white?

And those that kept electing and electing those maggots maggotess in white to continue their stealing and laffing laffing all the way to their banks?
 
Quran, Sharia law , also require hand of thief to be chopped off!

View attachment 69761


View attachment 69762

How many times did she steal?

And what about maggots maggotess in white?

And those that kept electing and electing those maggots maggotess in white to continue their stealing and laffing laffing all the way to their banks?

Thanks to PAP, such barbaric laws are banned. It would have been a different story if the PAS came to power in Jiuhu. They would be lopping everyone else's hands but their own for thieving and corruption.
 
Thanks to PAP, such barbaric laws are banned. It would have been a different story if the PAS came to power in Jiuhu. They would be lopping everyone else's hands but their own for thieving and corruption.


1578546018300.png


Who are those laffing and laffing and laffing and laffing on the way to their banks in Stinkapore?


Who are those laffing and laffing and laffing and laffing on the way to their banks in Stinkapore?

Who are those laffing and laffing and laffing and laffing on the way to their banks in Stinkapore?

1578546081900.png
 
If is a Mosque no need guess race..99.99% you know what race..unless it gets changed..ha ha ha
 
Thanks to PAP, such barbaric laws are banned. It would have been a different story if the PAS came to power in Jiuhu. They would be lopping everyone else's hands but their own for thieving and corruption.

Do they cut off the dick, if you are caught raping a woman? or the woman gets her's plugged & breasts lopped off..for she seductively cause the man to sin?
 
Chopping of the hand is not islamic law. A person caught thieving must work for the victim until the work amounts to the value of goods taken. Or something like that.
 
the church guy also embezzle $ but only jail 3 years,y this gal can jail 15 years,bcos he is chinese??
 
the church guy also embezzle $ but only jail 3 years,y this gal can jail 15 years,bcos he is chinese??
The church guy claim he is the god messenger
The lady coporate service officer
1 court 2 law :biggrin:
 
The punishment for theft in the Quran


The punishment enforced in some Islamic countries for the crime of theft is based on the wrong interpretation of the following verse:


[5:38] The male thief, and the female thief, you shall 'eqta'u' (cut) their hands as a penalty for what they have committed as a deterrent from God. God is Dignified, Wise.


According to the incorrect interpretation of 5:38, the law in these Islamic countries deems the punishment of severing the hand of anyone caught stealing. But is this the correct interpretation of God's words in 5:38?

To determine the correct meaning of 5:38 we must analyse the key word in this verse which is the Arabic word "eqta'u".
The word "eqta'u" (which is the command form of the word ‘qata’aa’) has been wrongly interpreted by the traditional scholars to mean: to sever. But the word for sever in Arabic is 'batara' and not 'qata'aa'. In 108:3 we read the word "abtar" which speaks of he who whose progeny has been cut off/severed. In 5:38 God did not use the word 'batara' but used the word "eqta'u".
The Arabic word 'qata'aa', and how it is used, is not any different from the use of the same word (cut) in English.
The word 'cut' can mean sever/cut off and can also mean to cause a cut or wound.

Example: You may be working in the kitchen one day and you accidently make a small cut in your hand with the knife, then you would tell your wife, "I have cut my hand"! Does this mean you have completely severed your hand? Obviously not, it only means you have made a cut in your hand or marked it.

FIRST:


The Quran gives us confirmation that the correct meaning of the word ‘iqta’oo’ (command form of qatta’a) in 5:38 is to cause a cut/mark and not to sever.

When we read the story of the prophet Joseph in Sura 12 we read another instance where the word "qatta'a" is used. In 12:31 we read how the women guests of the lady of the house upon seeing how handsome Joseph was, their impulsive reaction was to "qattaana" (plural femine of qatta’a) their hands with the knives given to them. The question here is: Did these women completely sever their hands? Obviously not, they only made a cut/mark in their hands.
We note that the root word "eqta'u" is used in 5:38 and also in 12:31.
God gives a clear sign that the same word ‘qatta’a’ in both verses has the same meaning. This is evident by the fact that the sum of both sets of Sura and Verse numbers is identical:

5 + 38 = 43
12 + 31 = 43


Undoubtedly, there will be some who will rush to describe this as a coincidental occurrence, but they should be reminded with God’s words where God confirms that every word and every verse in the Quran has been perfected and thus there is nothing coincidental in the Quran:


[11:1] A.L.R. A Book whose verses have been perfected.


Consequently, part of the punishment for theft according to the Most Merciful is to mark or make a visible cut on the hand of the offender so as to shame him in front of the people. This social humiliation is part of the deterrent.


SECOND:


But this is not all! If making a cut on the hand of the thief were the only punishment then in many cases it would not be sufficient deterrent to stop the thief from re-offending.
The second course of action decreed in the Quran for the one who commits theft is based on the law of equivalence:


[5:45] And We decreed for them in it that a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth and equivalence regarding wounds. If one forfeits what is due to him as a charity, it will atone for his sins. Those who do not rule by what God has brought down, they are indeed the transgressors.


By virtue of the law set out by God for equivalence in 5:45, a thief who robs another person should be made to compensate the victim by working for him till the victim is fully paid for all damage incurred. Simply going to prison will not compensate the victim in any way!
So for example, the thief who is convicted of stealing a thousand dollars from you must work for you until you are fully paid for the thousand dollars you lost, plus any other damage and inconvenience the theft may have caused you.
This Quranic solution maintains justice for all, the thief's innocent wife and children are not deprived of their husband/father or the income he brings home to the family. Moreover, the expensive prison system in this case is eliminated.


THIRD:


God, the Most Merciful, does not cause any person to be punished for the sins of another (6:164). Severing the hand of the thief would permanently deprive him of his livelihood and as a result, his family and dependants would experience hardship for no fault of theirs! God’s law is fair and God’s wisdom is unequalled.
Applying the correct punishment for theft would give the offender the opportunity to repent and reform after the full punishment is completed and the victim has been compensated.


FOURTH:


Severing the hand of the thief constitutes a life-long punishment that cannot be reversed should the offender genuinely wish to repent and reform.
In all the Quran, there are no life-long punishments! Even the punishment of adultery, which is considered one of the greatest sins, is not a life-long punishment.
The reason that there are no life-long punishments in the Quran is simply because God being the Most Merciful accepts the repentance of all who repent sincerely and reform. A life-long punishment would violate the concept of someone being forgiven. A forgiven person has no further punishment, but a man with a severed hand is punished for the rest of his life, even if he repents and reforms!
God gives us in the very next verse (5:39) further conclusive evidence for the correct meaning of the punishment for theft.


[5:39] Then whoever repents after his transgression, and reforms, God redeems him. God is Forgiver, Merciful.


In 5:39 God says that He will ‘yatoob’ (redeem) all those who repent and reform. The verse ends with the words God is Forgiver, Merciful. When God ‘yatoob’ (redeems) any person, forgives him (Forgiver) and grants him His mercy (Merciful), this means that this person is no longer punished. Needless to say, a person with a severed arm will have a life-long punishment that cannot be reversed and thus can never be free of his punishment!
Those who insist on claiming that the punishment of theft is to sever the hand of the thief are therefore those who reject God’s infinite mercy.
 
The punishment for theft in the Quran


The punishment enforced in some Islamic countries for the crime of theft is based on the wrong interpretation of the following verse:


[5:38] The male thief, and the female thief, you shall 'eqta'u' (cut) their hands as a penalty for what they have committed as a deterrent from God. God is Dignified, Wise.


According to the incorrect interpretation of 5:38, the law in these Islamic countries deems the punishment of severing the hand of anyone caught stealing. But is this the correct interpretation of God's words in 5:38?

To determine the correct meaning of 5:38 we must analyse the key word in this verse which is the Arabic word "eqta'u".
The word "eqta'u" (which is the command form of the word ‘qata’aa’) has been wrongly interpreted by the traditional scholars to mean: to sever. But the word for sever in Arabic is 'batara' and not 'qata'aa'. In 108:3 we read the word "abtar" which speaks of he who whose progeny has been cut off/severed. In 5:38 God did not use the word 'batara' but used the word "eqta'u".
The Arabic word 'qata'aa', and how it is used, is not any different from the use of the same word (cut) in English.
The word 'cut' can mean sever/cut off and can also mean to cause a cut or wound.

Example: You may be working in the kitchen one day and you accidently make a small cut in your hand with the knife, then you would tell your wife, "I have cut my hand"! Does this mean you have completely severed your hand? Obviously not, it only means you have made a cut in your hand or marked it.

FIRST:


The Quran gives us confirmation that the correct meaning of the word ‘iqta’oo’ (command form of qatta’a) in 5:38 is to cause a cut/mark and not to sever.

When we read the story of the prophet Joseph in Sura 12 we read another instance where the word "qatta'a" is used. In 12:31 we read how the women guests of the lady of the house upon seeing how handsome Joseph was, their impulsive reaction was to "qattaana" (plural femine of qatta’a) their hands with the knives given to them. The question here is: Did these women completely sever their hands? Obviously not, they only made a cut/mark in their hands.
We note that the root word "eqta'u" is used in 5:38 and also in 12:31.
God gives a clear sign that the same word ‘qatta’a’ in both verses has the same meaning. This is evident by the fact that the sum of both sets of Sura and Verse numbers is identical:

5 + 38 = 43
12 + 31 = 43


Undoubtedly, there will be some who will rush to describe this as a coincidental occurrence, but they should be reminded with God’s words where God confirms that every word and every verse in the Quran has been perfected and thus there is nothing coincidental in the Quran:


[11:1] A.L.R. A Book whose verses have been perfected.


Consequently, part of the punishment for theft according to the Most Merciful is to mark or make a visible cut on the hand of the offender so as to shame him in front of the people. This social humiliation is part of the deterrent.


SECOND:


But this is not all! If making a cut on the hand of the thief were the only punishment then in many cases it would not be sufficient deterrent to stop the thief from re-offending.
The second course of action decreed in the Quran for the one who commits theft is based on the law of equivalence:


[5:45] And We decreed for them in it that a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth and equivalence regarding wounds. If one forfeits what is due to him as a charity, it will atone for his sins. Those who do not rule by what God has brought down, they are indeed the transgressors.


By virtue of the law set out by God for equivalence in 5:45, a thief who robs another person should be made to compensate the victim by working for him till the victim is fully paid for all damage incurred. Simply going to prison will not compensate the victim in any way!
So for example, the thief who is convicted of stealing a thousand dollars from you must work for you until you are fully paid for the thousand dollars you lost, plus any other damage and inconvenience the theft may have caused you.
This Quranic solution maintains justice for all, the thief's innocent wife and children are not deprived of their husband/father or the income he brings home to the family. Moreover, the expensive prison system in this case is eliminated.


THIRD:


God, the Most Merciful, does not cause any person to be punished for the sins of another (6:164). Severing the hand of the thief would permanently deprive him of his livelihood and as a result, his family and dependants would experience hardship for no fault of theirs! God’s law is fair and God’s wisdom is unequalled.
Applying the correct punishment for theft would give the offender the opportunity to repent and reform after the full punishment is completed and the victim has been compensated.


FOURTH:


Severing the hand of the thief constitutes a life-long punishment that cannot be reversed should the offender genuinely wish to repent and reform.
In all the Quran, there are no life-long punishments! Even the punishment of adultery, which is considered one of the greatest sins, is not a life-long punishment.
The reason that there are no life-long punishments in the Quran is simply because God being the Most Merciful accepts the repentance of all who repent sincerely and reform. A life-long punishment would violate the concept of someone being forgiven. A forgiven person has no further punishment, but a man with a severed hand is punished for the rest of his life, even if he repents and reforms!
God gives us in the very next verse (5:39) further conclusive evidence for the correct meaning of the punishment for theft.


[5:39] Then whoever repents after his transgression, and reforms, God redeems him. God is Forgiver, Merciful.


In 5:39 God says that He will ‘yatoob’ (redeem) all those who repent and reform. The verse ends with the words God is Forgiver, Merciful. When God ‘yatoob’ (redeems) any person, forgives him (Forgiver) and grants him His mercy (Merciful), this means that this person is no longer punished. Needless to say, a person with a severed arm will have a life-long punishment that cannot be reversed and thus can never be free of his punishment!
Those who insist on claiming that the punishment of theft is to sever the hand of the thief are therefore those who reject God’s infinite mercy.

In doubt just refer to the Quran n Hadiths. Follow God's commandment. Not the followers/clergyman. Pork haram means haram. :)
 
Back
Top