• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Methinks he is talking cock!

VIBGYOR

Alfrescian
Loyal
AG Woon says there's only one law for both the rich and poor
By Asha Popatlal, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 11 December 2008 2133 hrs

SINGAPORE: There is no such thing as one law for the rich and one for the poor, nor one for the well-connected in Singapore.

Attorney-General Walter Woon made this clear as he delivered the inaugural Association of Criminal Lawyers of Singapore (ACLS) lecture on Thursday.

Interest in the topic had been stoked after the Association's president Subhas Anandan raised the issue in its newsletter of certain well-off or white-collar accused persons being allowed to pay compound fines for their offences.

Professor Woon argued that a common scenario is for the courts to refuse to let the accused settle privately with the victim in simple cases. In such cases, the fine goes to court and the victim is no better off financially.

On the other hand, Mr Subhas cited cases where the offender is allowed to compound his offence with no objection from the prosecution.

One such recent case cited was a doctor who paid S$51,000 to a lady patient who claimed she was molested by him.

Outlining the scenarios under which his office prosecutes, Prof Woon stressed that while compensation naturally favours richer people, the judge acts as a final check as to whether this can be allowed, as long as public interest is not adversely affected.

"What factors do we not consider? We don't consider whether someone is rich, certainly not – or politically well-connected. We cannot conduct prosecutions on the basis that some people are above the law. Certainly we don't conduct prosecutions on the basis that the rich and well-connected get away with it.

"This is dangerous; this undermines the whole rule of law – that some people think because of their political convictions, they cannot be touched. That is a very, very slippery slope. Not the game that we will play here," he said.
 

jixiaolan

Alfrescian
Loyal

One such recent case cited was a doctor who paid S$51,000 to a lady patient who claimed she was molested by him.

Outlining the scenarios under which his office prosecutes, Prof Woon stressed that while compensation naturally favours richer people, the judge acts as a final check as to whether this can be allowed, as long as public interest is not adversely affected.


AG Walter Woon should ask the victim whether she will be willing to be molested again if the doctor is willing to pay her another S$51,000. I guess that will act as a good final check.
 

snrcitizen

Alfrescian
Loyal
"This is dangerous; this undermines the whole rule of law – that some people think because of their political convictions, they cannot be touched. That is a very, very slippery slope. Not the game that we will play here," he said.

This is a very thinly veiled threat. :mad:
 

melzp

Alfrescian
Loyal
What about political intervention ?
I remembered a drug case where this German gal (Bohl) who is daughter
of Chrysler Sgp chief got away leniently; otherwise gallows.
Someone, somewhere interfered that the heroin is unpure and diluted.
So, penalty she paid got dioluted too.
Im sure the German Govt intervened, being a superpower.
If dhe is fm 3rd World, no hope at all.

And, if anyone recall.............drugs possession among celebrities.
Also, got off leniently and quietly. Remember Lincoln of Zouk ?
Only got fine. Yr guess is as good as mine.
 

Hope

Alfrescian
Loyal
AG Walter Woon should ask the victim whether she will be willing to be molested again if the doctor is willing to pay her another S$51,000. I guess that will act as a good final check.
Fatty Woon has sold his soul for a mere S$2 million+ a year,which is only 3 peanuts.

A rather stupid guy,he shall be judged when his time comes,as all of us do.

Never forget what he said before he got this 3 peanuts and what he sings now.
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
One such recent case cited was a doctor who paid S$51,000 to a lady patient who claimed she was molested by him.

Outlining the scenarios under which his office prosecutes, Prof Woon stressed that while compensation naturally favours richer people, the judge acts as a final check as to whether this can be allowed, as long as public interest is not adversely affected.

AG Walter Woon should ask the victim whether she will be willing to be molested again if the doctor is willing to pay her another S$51,000. I guess that will act as a good final check.

That a good one buddy, Judge acts as a final check on whether public interest is not adversely effected ? If the aggressor is willing to pay money and settle the case , how does the judge exercise the judgement ? Aggressor paid 51k to close the case and it will not waste tax payers money , dragging on the case ? I think if the doc cant afford to pay 51k, you think he will not go jail ? So , with plenty of money , the chances of being acquitted is much lesser ! Yes , there is only one law for poor and rich , but the application for both is vastly different !

I don think the doc is the BASTARD kind of person. That why he settle for the 51k compensation.

If the doc is a real bastard , he might want to make sure she will pay everything , all the charges she might incurr if she lose the case. Why pay the victim 51k if you can even get more $ out from the victim herself ?I think if you are rich , you can get some one top notch to dig some dirt out of this lady and expose everything in the court. Making her words unbelivable. This way the prosecuting side will not only lose the case , but they might be face with a huge bill if the prosecuting lose the case.
 
Top