• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Melyssa Goh Of Marine Parade Caught In A Compromising Photo With WP Lao Jongker! Wants Compensation Or Else!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
To Whom It May Concern,

Yesterday (29th June 2020), my husband Andrew and I were having dinner at a coffee shop in Marine Terrace at 8:40pm. Suddenly, Yee Jenn Jong from The Workers' Party came up and interrupted our meal with his photographer who took photos of us eating while we took hold of the pamphlet they gave us.

While the photo portrayed a rather friendly interaction, the “conversation” was more that of an eligibility test for the photo — that we were first and foremost citizens and if we were of age to vote. No interest in any talk about the community or what we think can be improved.

It was completely unexpected, and to our chagrin we saw ourselves on the front page of The Straits Times 30th June 2020.
There was no conversational preamble and no consent given whatsoever, and Yee Jenn Jong and his photographer were in and out within seconds.

This is unacceptable, as it is a violation of our privacy and rights as Singaporeans and Singapore residents. It was a compromising photo and we were not given any warning, nor did they have the courtesy to ask for our consent for the photo to be taken, let alone used and published on the front page of the most widely read and circulated newspaper. We ask for your attention to this matter, and your coorperation in compensating us for this unacceptable violation of our privacy.

We would’ve preferred to connect less publicly but you don’t make it easy for citizens to reach out to you.


Sincerely,
Melyssa Goh & Andrew Chen



 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
striats times fault or workersparty fault?

It's clearly the wankers' party fault. Their candidate was clearly more interested in a quick photo op to give the false impression that he was genuinely concerned about Marine Parade residents.
 

kaninabuchaojibye

Alfrescian
Loyal
Melyssa's anger is clearly directed to the oppie hypocrite. None of this would have happened if he didn't approach the good couple who were peacefully eating their dinner.
ok.
honest mistake
lets move on
anyway, no such laws to protect this couple in singapore
korea has such laws, not singapore
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Don't expect professionalism from the 158th presstitutes, including their photography crew. :wink:

But methinks the lady protests too much. It's a non-issue to me. Photographers take photos of everyone and everything to be used as stock photos.
 

kaninabuchaojibye

Alfrescian
Loyal
Melyssa's anger is clearly directed to the oppie hypocrite. None of this would have happened if he didn't approach the good couple who were peacefully eating their dinner.
in korea it is forbidden to photograph women without their consent – even in public places. Neglecting to observe this rule is considered an act of sexual aggression and is punishable by a fine of 10 million won ($8,800) and up to 5 years imprisonment.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Do not expect too much from sinkie women. :wink:

Don't expect professionalism from the 158th presstitutes, including their photography crew. :wink:

But methinks the lady protests too much. It's a non-issue to me. Photographers take photos of everyone and everything to be used as stock photos.
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
She's afraid all her friends and relatives will associate her with WP. That she's a WP supporter and will vote for WP. By her outburst and show of displeasure, she wants to assure one and all that she is a pap cocksucker, oops sorry, supporter.:biggrin:
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
She's afraid all her friends and relatives will associate her with WP. That she's a WP supporter and will vote for WP. By her outburst and show of displeasure, she wants to assure one and all that she is a pap cocksucker, oops sorry, supporter.:biggrin:

Better to be a PAP cocksucker than an oppie cocksucker. The oppie cock can never stand. They always lose. Who the fuck in their right minds will support or join oppies?
 

kaninabuchaojibye

Alfrescian
Loyal
She's afraid all her friends and relatives will associate her with WP. That she's a WP supporter and will vote for WP. By her outburst and show of displeasure, she wants to assure one and all that she is a pap cocksucker, oops sorry, supporter.:biggrin:
maybe work in civil service
scared tio mark
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
Better to be a PAP cocksucker than an oppie cocksucker. The oppie cock can never stand. They always lose. Who the fuck in their right minds will support or join oppies?
So, how big of a win you think your pap will get this time?
 

kaninabuchaojibye

Alfrescian
Loyal
Super mandate is 75-80%. But yeah, with 66% they will also say strong mandate.
i think pap internal tarrget is to get 66% of total popular vote as all seats contested.
they wouldn't mind losing a grc and a few smc
if average out can get 2/3 of total popular vote of all eligible voters, they will be very very happy
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Super mandate is 75-80%. But yeah, with 66% they will also say strong mandate.

If 66% of the votes translate into over 90 seats in Parliament, it would be a rather decent result for the PAP. We're aiming for all the seats, and if we're lucky, we even win back Hougang SMC.
 
Top