Mediacorpse's Only Duty is to Spread PAPee Propaganda

[makapaaa]

Nov 20, 2009

Historic omission

<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar -->

Aleksandar Duric (No. 9 jersey) celebrates his goal with team mates (from left) Shaiful Esah, Shahril Ishak and Ridhuan Muhamad. -- PHOTO: BERITA HARIAN

<!-- story content : start -->
Historic omission
'A live telecast of soccer matches involving the national team should be a given.'
MR TAN SHAO KEN: 'Singapore scored a historic soccer victory on Wednesday night when the Lions upset Thailand 1-0 in Bangkok, a feat last achieved 34 years ago. Yet, Singaporeans were blanked out of this dramatic tussle between two of Asean's enduring football rivals because MediaCorp refused to telecast the match live. MediaCorp's decision underscores the institutional problem that is hugely responsible for a lack of support for the national team. How can we encourage and instil the passion to support the national team if such a vital conduit like live telecasts is closed to the public and made available fitfully or on the spur of the moment? A live telecast of soccer matches involving the national soccer team, especially at venues abroad, in official competitions should be a given, regardless of whether the team is in a tournament's qualifying or final stages. Let us hope that MediaCorp and the Football Association of Singapore will ensure such fundamental lapses do not happen again.'

 

[oli9]

And we're paying S$110 TV licence fee for? Even Msia has more channels than us & the best part is, theyve abolished TV licence many years ago citing its un-democratic to impose TV licence fee. Spore is also democratic no?

 

[fengshuisifu]

MediaCorpse ask for DONATIONS ON LEGO S$2.00...STILL REMEMBER THE DARK DAYS OF NKF...RENCAI....SHAME SHAME SHAME..NEVER SUPPORT LOCAL SPORTS!

 

[po2wq]

ah ken ...

show dat kind of soccer match, ah mediacorp cannot make $ la ... lidat how 2 pay ze salary of ze world's bestest paid politicians? ...

 

[gtang]

NATIONAL Joke when weddding of Chris & Fann broadcast LIVE....

 

[halsey02]

MediaCorpse ask for DONATIONS ON LEGO S$2.00...STILL REMEMBER THE DARK DAYS OF NKF...RENCAI....SHAME SHAME SHAME..NEVER SUPPORT LOCAL SPORTS!

lego is damn happy...they can clear all their stocks in 1 mth, which they have trouble selling their over-priced lego bricks...and few child these days, want them...

GIVE..:p

 

[Devil Within]

And we're paying S$110 TV licence fee for? Even Msia has more channels than us & the best part is, theyve abolished TV licence many years ago citing its un-democratic to impose TV licence fee. Spore is also democratic no?

Malaysia got opposition to voice these issues. Singapore don't have.

 

[oli9]

Malaysia got opposition to voice these issues. Singapore don't have.

For your info, its not the call of Msia's opposition to abolish TV licence. In fact, its the ruling party that made this call. This is because TV stations themselves has TV spots revenue which is more than sufficient to keep its operations going.
Below is some old news of our 1st world fees for a 3rd world license.


Mon, Oct 13, 2008
The New Paper

Time to abolish radio and TV licence fees?

MORE and more countries have abolished the archaic radio and TV licence fee in the last 10years.

But here, some are paying for a cable set-top box from StarHub and perhaps another from SingTel. And on top of this, they, like everyone else, have to pay the Media Development Authority for TV shows they may never watch.

A number of other countries including Australia, Belgium, India and New Zealand - and even Malaysia in1999 - have abolished radio and TV licence fees.

The reason was simply that commercial channels would have to earn their keep from advertising. This ensures that TV and radio organisations are run efficiently. It's the drip-feed from taxpayers' money that can make organisations act like dinosaurs.

Interestingly enough, 11 other countries, including the US and Canada, never ever had a TV licence fee.

In the UK, the licence fee goes directly to the BBC, which is commercial free. But it does not stop the BBC from wide use of merchandising, sale of programmes, books and television rights, to bolster its revenue.

However, it seems it won't be long before this goes the way of the dodo.

Yet homes here have to pay $110 a year (and another $27 for each car) though MediaCorp is a commercial entity, and its revenue comes from advertisers. Even their newsreaders wear watches, clothes and maybe even undergarments, from advertisers.

So, is it still really necessary to have this stealth tax?

Letters to newspapers have repeatedly argued against it. But those who don't pay face the threat of a fine and perhaps even jail.

$111 million in past year

It was reported that the Media Development Authority collected more than $111 million in radio and TV licence fees in the past year. It has repeatedly argued that the fee is necessary to provide and fund the more than 3,000 hours of public service programmes, including those in the minority languages, and coverage of events like the National Day celebrations.

Yes, we need some worthy programmes to build community alongside the commercial fare. But can this be done better via a public broadcasting service - a non-profit operation? The PBS in the US and the BBC World Service are trusted institutions.

Whereas a government-controlled MediaCorp earns no kudos from being both a public and commercial broadcaster. Mixing the two can create doubts about its 'real' agenda.

MediaCorp should inform, educate and entertain the masses in a commercially viable way. If their programmes are hugely popular, advertisers will want to support them. And if they are bad, put them out of their misery, instead of putting them on a life-support system funded by ordinary taxpayers.

Someone once said we get the radio and TV we deserve. Should we not then have a say in what programmes we want and can see? When was the last time, if ever, we had a public consultation on the free-to-air range of shows that viewers want?

Abolishing the fee, especially in these difficult times, will give cash-strapped Singaporeans access to the information and entertainment content television offers, without the burden of an additional tax. It's enough that we have to pay for cable TV. But there we have a choice of what we want to watch and pay for.

 

[cooleo]

Malaysia got opposition to voice these issues. Singapore don't have.

I tot we have...the...ok never mind :p

 

[halsey02]

The only country on this planet, who pay for what they want you to watch...worst than communist China, but not far from the Democratic Republic of KOREA...

 

[kitkat]

'Singapore scored a historic soccer victory on Wednesday night when the Lions upset Thailand 1-0 in Bangkok, a feat last achieved 34 years ago

mediacorp never thought singapore could win

 

[TeeKee]

SGP should allow Satellite Dishes....

Thousands of Channels...

So that we won't have to watch Propaganda again...