• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Mean testing start today

dream_waker

Alfrescian
Loyal
Frankly speaking, what do common people gain from a buoyant economic growth?

More competition from FT, higher property price, higher inflation, higher transport fare, higher ERP, lower medical subsidy and more million dollar minister.

Fuck the PAP.

Sincere wish for total economic collapse this year.
 
Last edited:

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Frankly speaking, what do common people gain from a buoyant economic growth?

More competition from FT, higher property price, higher inflation, higher transport fare, higher ERP, lower medical subsidy and more million dollar minister.

Fuck the PAP.

Sincere wish for total economic collapse this year.
We should implement means testing for government ministers.
If their net worth is 8 figures, they should give back their salaries to jumpstart the economy and help the poor.
If they want to be government ministers, they need to have an altruistic mindset and not be motivated by money.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
they should give back their salaries to jumpstart the economy and help the poor.
If they want to be government ministers, they need to have an altruistic mindset and not be motivated by money.

Why do the poor need to be helped in the first place?:rolleyes: If they can't make ends meet, it's their own damned problem. There's absolutely no reason why they should be entitled to a free lunch!:eek:

"Helping the poor" makes for a great motherhood statement but in reality, all it does is breed a culture of welfare dependency that no country can afford.

If ministers have excess cash, they should be handing it over to successful entrepreneurs in the form of grants so they can grow their business further or use the cash as working capital during these hard times. Giving the money to the losers of society does no good for anyone whatsoever.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Why do the poor need to be helped in the first place?:rolleyes: If they can't make ends meet, it's their own damned problem. There's absolutely no reason why they should be entitled to a free lunch!:eek:

"Helping the poor" makes for a great motherhood statement but in reality, all it does is breed a culture of welfare dependency that no country can afford.

If ministers have excess cash, they should be handing it over to successful entrepreneurs in the form of grants so they can grow their business further or use the cash as working capital during these hard times. Giving the money to the losers of society does no good for anyone whatsoever.
I said both to jumpstart the economy (perhaps grants for businessmen) and to give the poor.
I'm not in favour of giving money to losers who want to buy a car instead of taking the bus or to old and rude people who were gamblers and drinkers in their youth and are now paying the price. The money will be meant for good decent people who due to some misfortune, illness or other valid reasons, are struggling to survive through no fault if their own. Eg. old ladies who are still doing cleaning jobs.
 
Top