• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

many signs of earth's doom's day showing, earth's core melt

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Messages
6,070
Points
83
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/08/earths-moving-melting-core.html


Earth's Moving, Melting Core
by Kristen Minogue on August 4, 2010 3:27 PM | Permanent Link | 3 Comments
Email Print | More
Previous Article Next Article
Enlarge Image
sn-earthcore.jpg
Core issue. New research suggests that Earth's inner core could be melting and moving at the same time.
Credit: Thinkstock

Strange forces are at work 5000 kilometers below Earth's surface. The inner core is acting in ways that scientists can't explain. Theoretically, the core should be drawing iron from its molten surroundings and crystallizing it into solid metal. But that alone doesn't account for a number of odd observations—unless, as a few scientists speculate, the core is also melting.

The inner core, a solid ball of mostly iron 1200 kilometers across, formed hundreds of millions of years ago when Earth's blazing interior began to cool and the heaviest elements started to sink. It's been growing slowly ever since. Scientists speculate that the inner core gets bigger as it absorbs and hardens molten iron from the liquid outer core. But that fails to explain the dense liquid at the boundary between the inner and outer core. The liquid should be lighter if the inner core really is pulling heavier elements from the outer core. The hypothesis also doesn't explain why seismic waves from earthquakes—some of the only tools scientists can use to see that far beneath the surface—travel faster on the eastern side of the inner core than on the western side.

The answer to these riddles, according to a new model published in the 5 August issue of Nature, is that Earth's core is much more dynamic than scientists thought. Lead author Thierry Alboussière, a geophysicist at the University of Lyon in France, suggests that the inner core crystallizes in the west and melts in the east. That is, the eastern edge is slowly breaking down, while the western edge keeps building up more iron. The process is a bit like a treadmill: the solid iron "moves" eastward at a pace of roughly 1.5 centimeters per year, melting when it reaches the eastern edge. At this pace, Alboussière says, it takes 100 million years for the inner core to recycle itself.

The team's model would explain the thick liquid layer at the boundary between the inner and outer cores. If it is fluid that just melted out of the dense inner core, it would be heavier than the rest of the outer core. And if the inner core is crystallizing on its west end and melting on its east, that would also account for the different seismic wave speeds on both sides.

If the model is correct, Alboussière says, the inner core is still growing, but it has to absorb iron much faster to make up for all the iron that's melting away. And because movement in the inner core affects the outer core, which generates Earth's magnetic field, the lopsided melting would force scientists to rethink how Earth's magnetism works as well.

"There's a lot of unknowns, but it's definitely plausible," says Peter Olson, a geophysicist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. He notes that another model has tried using the mantle, the layer between the crust and the outer core, to make sense of the core's oddities. That hypothesis speculates that circulation in the mantle affects circulation in the outer core, which in turn affects the inner core in something like a chain reaction. The fact that Alboussière's model manages to explain things more simply is a plus, Olson says. "It's an Occam's razor. It has fewer moving parts."

The two hypotheses aren't mutually exclusive, geophysicist Michael Bergman of Bard College at Simon's Rock in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, points out. The inner core could be under the mantle's influence and be melting at the same time. Still, he says, "I think it's at this point the most plausible explanation we have."
 
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/100808/17/2ap8v.html


地球內核 正在移動與熔化
NOWnews 更新日期:"2010/08/08 11:12" 生活中心/台北報導

人類萬物身處的地球,地表以下5000公里之處的內核,有科學家無法解釋的奇怪作用力正在發生。理論上,內核會從它周圍熔化狀態的外核擷取鐵元素並使之結晶成固體。但是,這並不能解釋許多奇怪的觀測數據,除非真的是如同少數科學家假設的,「核心正在熔化中」。

根據現行理論,地球內核是個直徑1200公里的固體,絕大部分是由鐵元素所組成,大約是在數億年前地球內部開始冷卻而發生重的元素向內沈、輕的元素向外浮的分異作用過程中形成的,而且它還在不斷地緩慢成長中。

科學家認為內核會從外核擷取鐵的成分而愈來愈大,但是卻無法解釋內核與外核之間的邊界上,為何會存在一個稠密的液體層;因為,如果內核真的正在從外核擷取較重的元素,那麼這層液體層應該會因為較重元素被擷取走而變得比較輕。此外,這個假說也無法解釋地震波傳遞速度為何在內核的東側會比西側快。

根據法國里昂大學(University of Lyon)地球物理學家Thierry Alboussière等人的最新研究,地球核心的動態遠比科學家所想的還大,內核西側正不斷地擷取鐵元素並使之結晶,但東側卻正在緩慢熔化中;整個內核由西側向東側每年移動約1.5公分,使得每1億年左右,整個內核便會完成一次循環。而東側剛熔化成液體的物質因比外核的還重,理所當然會「沈」在外核之下;此外,既然西側在結晶而東側在熔化,兩側的震波速度當然會不同。

如果Alboussière等人的模型正確,那麼內核的確是在成長中,但它擷取鐵並使之結晶的速度,必須比熔化的速度還快。另外,由於內核運動會影響到外核,而熔化狀態的外核是地球磁場的來源,所以兩側不對稱的熔化態,必定會促使科學家重新思考地球磁場的運作方式。

有另一組科學家正嘗試利用地函來解釋地核古怪特性。他們認為地函中的環流會影響外核的環流,繼而又影響內核,這是個連鎖反應。雖然Alboussière等人的模型假說比較簡單,但有科學家認為,這兩個假說都是到目前為止看似最有力的假說,而且或許可並行存在,並不會互相違背排斥。
 
Back
Top